I remember Geert VandenBossche saying something like, when you jab people in the middle of an epidemic, the virus will mutate quicker. that one would inject a pregnant woman is beyond belief. I saw the vaxxed films and remember a young woman who had the papilloma shots, got very sick from it, was vaccine damaged, and a few years later, got cervical cancer. I know several who got the covid shots and were sick from the shots and then had the virus.
#1 A huge issue with the COVID vaccines was it being known that prior to COVID-19, each attempt to make a SARS vaccine backfired and instead caused the vaccinated animals to become severely ill with SARS (when compared to unvaccinated animals). This phenomena was referred to as “antibody dependent enhancement” (Peter Hotez even warned Congress about it before he became the national COVID vaccine spokesman). It is quite likely similar is happening with the COVID vaccines.
#2 Antibody dependent enhancement has also been observed with the one influenza vaccine.
#3 I and many others (e.g., the commenters here) have noticed that flu shots often make people become ill with the flu (which raises the possibility they had a stable flu infection in the background prior to vaccination) and likewise, anecdotally, I’ve noticed everyone I’ve worked with who was hospitalized for the flu had also received a flu shot that year.
Additionally, I miswrote original antigenic sin (it's "antigenic" not "antigen").
I cannot tell you how many people I know who got the transfection (vaccine) and shortly thereafter got shingles. Almost everyone....and then all of a sudden on tv you were inundated with shingle vaccine ads.
I hate to say it but blaming a virus in order to promote a vaccine to prevent certain conditions is pretty much a scam.
For example, with HPV they didn't establish a strong connection to cervical cancer or any other cancers. It was a correlation! What do you find at the scene of damage? Something that looks like a bunch of DNA broken off... They sequence that and get "HPV". Virology these days is dependant on the scam of genetics, where we still have not had much progress, 😂.
And the vaccine itself has the cause of sickness, in the case of HPV it's their super duper (at the time) new adjuvant. Every time they try to introduce new technology in virology it's worse and worse. Now we have so many viruses and still no cure.
It's just like the genome project for cancer which never cures cancer.
Midwestern doctor, you are one of the few, in the medical profession who are in the know! In the past, any person who injected toxic elements into another human being, would have been accused of murder; except for medical doctors. I've read iabout vaccinations dring the 1800s; and their heinous results, under the auspices of the Medical Field and the goverment; i.e. town of Leicester, England...it lost 90% of its population. Vaccinations were stopped in Leicester, but smallpox vaccines kept on being used. In the 1930s chldren needed it to enter school in America.. In 1980, smallpox was declared eradicated. It was not due to the smallpox vaccine. Better nutrtion and sanitation contributed to the lowering of most childhood diseases...but Big Pharma, of course, took credit.
Extremely well written - a non-medical person like me could read it from top to bottom without feeling lost in jargonland! And damn the pharma industry for repeating their crimes again and again using their formula for death...and profits.
Another fantastic, informative post! My youngest daughter was still at school when the HPV vaccine was introduced, and my gut feeling was not to give permission for it, which I didn't. Soon after that, I happened to be in a microbiology class at university where the lecturer had been part the team that developed that vaccine. He told us that he was disappointed in it because they had chosen one viral version that he considered the least causal for cervical cancer. That sealed it for me - no way would I support this vaccine. Of course, over the last few years I have come to question ALL the vaccines (and as a nurse, that makes my work severely compromising).
Here in Australia, both boys and girls aged 12-13 are offered HPV vaccines. I want to know whether the incidence of cervical cancer has actually reduced!
Excellent Analysis! The corporate medicine man ignores the central role that the immune system has in prevention and stopping disease states from all pathogens! If the Covid was addressed by educating humanity, in how to improve their immune system, we would not have gone down the road we did! Of course, that was not the preplanned agenda! Money trumps good medical!
Dear AMD, I read all your posts, and this is one the very tip-top best. I love how you put it at the end, that it is your hope that exposing this history might "help move our culture towards developing a 'herd immunity' against these predatory marketing practices." My profound thanks, for your writing has most certainly helped me in this regard.
Thank you for your informative and insightful article. I can’t help but view the RSV jab as more of the same…for all of my training and career, RSV was only considered serious for young infants. Now, the fear machine is pushing this on everyone. Keep up the good work!
I have often wondered why there is an such an emphasis on giving vaccines to people that are immunocompromised. Since the purpose of the vaccine is to stimulate the immunological system of the recipient to make antibodies against the pathogen, wouldn't these individuals be expected to derive less benefit than those with intact immunologic systems? Or possibly put at increased risk?
I remember Geert VandenBossche saying something like, when you jab people in the middle of an epidemic, the virus will mutate quicker. that one would inject a pregnant woman is beyond belief. I saw the vaxxed films and remember a young woman who had the papilloma shots, got very sick from it, was vaccine damaged, and a few years later, got cervical cancer. I know several who got the covid shots and were sick from the shots and then had the virus.
I forgot three major points when writing this.
#1 A huge issue with the COVID vaccines was it being known that prior to COVID-19, each attempt to make a SARS vaccine backfired and instead caused the vaccinated animals to become severely ill with SARS (when compared to unvaccinated animals). This phenomena was referred to as “antibody dependent enhancement” (Peter Hotez even warned Congress about it before he became the national COVID vaccine spokesman). It is quite likely similar is happening with the COVID vaccines.
#2 Antibody dependent enhancement has also been observed with the one influenza vaccine.
#3 I and many others (e.g., the commenters here) have noticed that flu shots often make people become ill with the flu (which raises the possibility they had a stable flu infection in the background prior to vaccination) and likewise, anecdotally, I’ve noticed everyone I’ve worked with who was hospitalized for the flu had also received a flu shot that year.
Additionally, I miswrote original antigenic sin (it's "antigenic" not "antigen").
Immunologist here.
Much of the illnesses seen today, especially in children are from vaccines.
There are no "safe and effective" vaccines.
Full stop.
I cannot tell you how many people I know who got the transfection (vaccine) and shortly thereafter got shingles. Almost everyone....and then all of a sudden on tv you were inundated with shingle vaccine ads.
From one small town Midwestern Pathologist (Doctor) to another Midwestern Doctor:
Don't ever stop banging the truth drum. Never. Ever. Hold the line. Many are with you. Many more than are seen publically. You are NOT alone.
Your drum beat echos within the social media vacuum of dis/misinformation and reverberates in the minds of those wise enough to follow your posts.
It would be my honor to meet you someday but I know your requisite anonymity is your only shield against those who seek to silence your drum beat.
Stay the course. Hold the line. Keep drumming.
All my best,
C.R. J 15:13
My hope and prayers are to do away with All inoculations. Every single one is poison and people need to wake up and just say No....
I hate to say it but blaming a virus in order to promote a vaccine to prevent certain conditions is pretty much a scam.
For example, with HPV they didn't establish a strong connection to cervical cancer or any other cancers. It was a correlation! What do you find at the scene of damage? Something that looks like a bunch of DNA broken off... They sequence that and get "HPV". Virology these days is dependant on the scam of genetics, where we still have not had much progress, 😂.
And the vaccine itself has the cause of sickness, in the case of HPV it's their super duper (at the time) new adjuvant. Every time they try to introduce new technology in virology it's worse and worse. Now we have so many viruses and still no cure.
It's just like the genome project for cancer which never cures cancer.
Midwestern doctor, you are one of the few, in the medical profession who are in the know! In the past, any person who injected toxic elements into another human being, would have been accused of murder; except for medical doctors. I've read iabout vaccinations dring the 1800s; and their heinous results, under the auspices of the Medical Field and the goverment; i.e. town of Leicester, England...it lost 90% of its population. Vaccinations were stopped in Leicester, but smallpox vaccines kept on being used. In the 1930s chldren needed it to enter school in America.. In 1980, smallpox was declared eradicated. It was not due to the smallpox vaccine. Better nutrtion and sanitation contributed to the lowering of most childhood diseases...but Big Pharma, of course, took credit.
Extremely well written - a non-medical person like me could read it from top to bottom without feeling lost in jargonland! And damn the pharma industry for repeating their crimes again and again using their formula for death...and profits.
What can one say. Beautiful as always.
Another fantastic, informative post! My youngest daughter was still at school when the HPV vaccine was introduced, and my gut feeling was not to give permission for it, which I didn't. Soon after that, I happened to be in a microbiology class at university where the lecturer had been part the team that developed that vaccine. He told us that he was disappointed in it because they had chosen one viral version that he considered the least causal for cervical cancer. That sealed it for me - no way would I support this vaccine. Of course, over the last few years I have come to question ALL the vaccines (and as a nurse, that makes my work severely compromising).
Here in Australia, both boys and girls aged 12-13 are offered HPV vaccines. I want to know whether the incidence of cervical cancer has actually reduced!
Excellent Analysis! The corporate medicine man ignores the central role that the immune system has in prevention and stopping disease states from all pathogens! If the Covid was addressed by educating humanity, in how to improve their immune system, we would not have gone down the road we did! Of course, that was not the preplanned agenda! Money trumps good medical!
.
For Doctors Of Medicine:
This Is Not A Crisis Of Identity;
This Is Not A Crisis Of Competence
( ... There Is Too Little To Matter) ;
This Is A Crisis Of Conscience.
.
Dear AMD, I read all your posts, and this is one the very tip-top best. I love how you put it at the end, that it is your hope that exposing this history might "help move our culture towards developing a 'herd immunity' against these predatory marketing practices." My profound thanks, for your writing has most certainly helped me in this regard.
Thank you for your informative and insightful article. I can’t help but view the RSV jab as more of the same…for all of my training and career, RSV was only considered serious for young infants. Now, the fear machine is pushing this on everyone. Keep up the good work!
I have often wondered why there is an such an emphasis on giving vaccines to people that are immunocompromised. Since the purpose of the vaccine is to stimulate the immunological system of the recipient to make antibodies against the pathogen, wouldn't these individuals be expected to derive less benefit than those with intact immunologic systems? Or possibly put at increased risk?