Hi "A MidWestern Doctor", I appreciate your analysis and I really appreciated you documenting the adverse events you personally saw in 2021. I read that article when it came out and it was one of the first documented evidence of harm I had seen. However, I need to point out a mistake I believe you made in this article. First, I will quote the deepl translation of the rebuttal you linked at the end of the article. Quote:
"Statement on the press conference of the AfD parliamentary group in the Bundestag
Yesterday, the AfD parliamentary group held a press conference to comment on billing data for panel physicians that had been evaluated and made available to them by the National Association of Panel Doctors (KBV). To this the chairman of the board of the central institute for the panel doctor supply (Zi), Dr. Dominik von Stillfried explains:
"The excitement about possibly increased deaths in 2021 lacks any basis. In fact, the development of the annual crude diagnosis prevalence after evaluation of the complete SHI-accredited physician billing data for the years 2012 to 2022 shows no conspicuities for the individual diagnosis codes highlighted by the AfD (ICD-10 codes R96-R98, I46.1, I46.9) in the entire period. There is no contradiction with the data used by the AfD. Rather, the phenomenon observed by the AfD is a logical consequence of the data evaluation. To our knowledge, Martin Sichert, a member of the Bundestag, requested contract physician billing data from the KBV in three steps:
In the first step, the data of all statutorily insured persons with health insurance who received an ICD coding for vaccination side effects (codes T88.1, T88.0, U12.9, and Y59.9) in 2021 were requested. For the insured population identified in this way, the second step was to list the frequencies of all diagnosis codes by quarter for the period 2016 to 2021. In the third step, the frequencies of all diagnosis codes for the remaining insureds with statutory health insurance (minus the insured collective covered under step 1) should be counted by quarters for the period 2016 to 2021.
In order to be able to compare the collectives in steps 2 and 3, the entire data set must refer to insured persons who have used at least one medical service in at least one quarter in 2021. Of these, logically, insureds may not die until 2021, for which corresponding codes cannot then be assigned until 2021. Thus, the apparent increase in codes for deaths is a logical consequence of data selection and methodologically known as the cohort effect. On the other hand, with the very rare occurrence of some codes for deaths in preceding years, this cohort may just be errors in entry or transmission."
End quote
What it sounds to me that they are saying, is that the sudden death codes (the plots you showed indicating a ~70 sigma increase) are simply an artifact of the way the reports were gathered. They are claiming that the numbers for the previous years should be 0 and if they are not then they must be errors in reporting because in order to get that data the researchers requested codes for those currently insured. Obviously you cant be currently insured if you are dead so its not an apples to apples comparison.. This would explain the absurdly high increase you saw (which is a consequence of this artifact in reporting, not a true indication of increase due to vaccines). It sounds like this issue would persist as well for the non-fatal codes, because you can imagine people having died since they had one of these codes, and thus not being included in the tally for the years 2016-2020. We would need that full historic dataset to get the true picture of any statistical increases (if any) seen. This is, of course, assuming what the rebuttal is saying is correct (which based on the sudden death codes, it does).
I may be missing something, but their argument does not make any sense to me (and I want to make sure I have it right so I am not spreading any misinformation). To address the points you are raising:
1). The sudden death codes were being regularly used prior to COVID-19, and then suddenly spiked. This seems to negate the argument that they all should have been 0 and I don't think it makes sense to say "oh must have been an error."
2) A lot of non fatal codes showed up as well with that increase, although many other nonfatal codes did not increase. I agree that the extreme elevation of some indicates there is a potential data error here, but at the same time, I don't see how you'd get the cohort effect for people who were alive and a mix of what did and did not increase.
3) This is the most important, I think that they requested data of that cohort as an initial point off comparison, but in the data being shown here, it looks like all the codes for everyone are shown, so it needs to be clarified if AFD's data is for everyone or its an artificial cohort.
The question I think rests on which cohort they are using. According to the rebuttal, "In order to be able to compare the collectives in steps 2 and 3, the entire data set must refer to insured persons who have used at least one medical service in at least one quarter in 2021."
The way I interpreted this when I wrote my comment (and I don't know german so I'm relying on deepl translation) is that the cohort used were insured in 2021. And that is what I was basing my comment on. But they seem to be implying that its not only those insured in 2021, its those insured and used their insurance in 2021. However, looking over the data again there are ~2k deaths per quarter in the "sudden death" categories shown in that plot. This would seem to refute their argument, since although I could see a handful of deaths being mislabeled, 2000 seems like a lot (and it is too consistent for it to be just random data entry errors).
So I agree with your point 1). For your point 2), the increase could just be that people died before 2021 who also had those non-fatal codes. But thinking about this more again it is flawed because it would seem that non-fatal codes would decrease the farther back in time due to more people dying out before 2021, rather the trend we see seems reflective of what we'd expect from the overall population increase for people in the age range susceptible for these diseases. So after thinking about it more that also seems to refute their point about the cohort effect.
Thanks for your response, after thinking about it more I agree with you that it definitely does NOT seem to be explained by their cohort effect argument although I do think we should get more details on exactly what cohort they used (because the ~70 sigma increase is rather extreme and not in line with the increase of other codes).
edit: also I just want to point out how deceptive their rebuttal is... assuming that your arguments against the rebuttal are correct ( which I agree with), their argument is completely bogus and they must know this... its shameful that they would brazenly lie like this, because you know people will simply point to the rebuttal and just say its explained by the cohort effect and it will be case closed in their mind.
I'm German. The deepl translation of the "rebuttal" is quite good. The crucial point is the meaning of the "must":
- Are they saying that comparison/merging of the data subsets is impossible if the second does not consist of people who have used at least one medical service in 2021 only? That seems nonsense to me.
- Are they saying that KBV interpreted the request as a request for people who have used at least one medical service in 2021 only, and filtered the data accordingly? That would be an error on KBV's side, since the request is quite clear.
Anyway, note that the rebuttal has been published by the "Zentralinstitut für die kassenärztliche Versorgung in Deutschland", which is not the same (though probably connected somehow) as the "Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung" (KBV; who sent the data). In Germany, it is always more important to distance yourself from the AfD than to speak the truth.
Regarding statements at a press conference of the AfD parliamentary group on December 12, 2022
12/12/2022 - "There must be discussions and debates, but not in such a way that numbers are interpreted into something that they simply cannot give," explained Dr. Andreas Gassen, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians, also on behalf of his board colleagues Dr. Stephen Hofmeister and Dr. Thomas Kriedel. The KBV board thus took a position on today's statements at a press conference of the AfD parliamentary group in Berlin.
The KBV board makes it clear: Based on the accounting data or ICD-10 codes transmitted by the KBV to the AfD, no causal connections can be established between COVID-19 vaccinations and deaths. From the point of view of the KBV, the increase in deaths shown in quarters I-IV 2021 and quarter I 2022 is largely due to excess mortality caused by the pandemic. This once again illustrates the importance of the COVID-19 vaccination as an effective measure to prevent severe forms of the disease and even death. Without the vaccination, the excess mortality would probably have been far higher."
There's no mentioning of errors in Tom Lausen's analysis here, probably because there are none. They are just reiterating points made by Tom Lausen as well during the press conference ("no causal connections can be established between vaccinations and deaths").
the increase in deaths shown in quarters I-IV 2021 and quarter I 2022 is largely due to excess mortality caused by the pandemic. This once again illustrates the importance of the COVID-19 vaccination as an effective measure to prevent severe forms of the disease and even death. Without the vaccination, the excess mortality would probably have been far higher."
Funny how this is almost verbatim the same conclusion in the Canadian article. Where have we seen this before?🤔
I think that I would reply as follows. First, evidence of undercounting of jab deaths has been established by autopsies, with [range]. If we wish to narrow this range, more autopsies will need to be done. Furthermore, the study of autopsies published by Schirmacher, et. al., show a need to change the autopsy procedure to rule out both covid and jab.
Second, without competently done autopsies, we have no means to ascertain the degree of undercounting of jab deaths.
Finally, any claim that excess mortality is simply due to covid is merely unsubstantiated opinion at a time when we need scientific data. In order to obtain this data, we must change the official autopsy procedure to include ruling out covid and jabs as cause of death by using immunostaining techniques when conducting autopsies of suspected jab and covid deaths. It is also time to establish how narrow we wish the range of uncertainty to be with respect to jab deaths and to perform sample autopsies accordingly.
Thank you! My current thinking is the criticism is justified. AfD screwed up. They should have asked for the ICD codes of the vaccinated and the ICD10 codes of the COVID unvaxxed by quarter. Then we can go to town. This is a real mess.
I am not sure if it would have been possible to provide that data because it's much easier to track all total codes received rather than categorize all of them by the source they came from.
Be aware there has also been a rebuttal of the criticism from another independent analyst who largely concurs with Lausen’s conclusions and does a number of ‘plausibility’ checks on the dataset which the AfD received. So I do not believe it is quite so simple to conclude this was an error from the AfD (although in Germany many would like to believe this because they are ‘framed’ as far right extremists) https://youtu.be/nqtEBULPLAY
Yep, this guy pretty much repeated the analysis. Main point there: contrary to the numbers of deaths with codes relatable to the jab, codes for deahs like suffocation did not show any rise. That means they cannot be explained as "errors" or whatever. That nullifies the supposed reason given by the ZI, and this time without error margin, of people dead in 2017 etc being treated in 2021.
Hi Steve, I'm not sure if you saw CM's comment above but KBV has their own official rebuttal. It doesn't mention anything about cohort issues, they just claim the spike in 2021-22 is just from covid. Seems to be the go-to explanation, blame it all on covid and if there is a discrepancy between excess mortality and official covid numbers, then the covid death numbers must be undercounted of course! (see this nature paper https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05522-2 ) . Its disturbing to me because many people including myself were predicting they'd just blame all vax deaths on covid and here we are. If there wasn't any clear link to covid then it must be the nebulous all encompassing "long covid" (which explains all possible strange health issues because almost everyone has caught covid at least once at this point).
In any case, I find their rebuttal unconvincing, where is the spike in ICD-10 codes in 2020 from the first wave? Why does it only increase after the jabs? They will say its because the delta wave was much worse in germany, but you can clearly see the delta wave starts in q4 of 2020 https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/daily-covid-cases-deaths?yScale=log&time=earliest..latest&country=~DEU . Also if its just from covid, why is the ICD-10 codes flat for 2021 meanwhile there are several spikes in death / cases due to "covid" not evenly distributed (ie q3 2021 should be much lower if its just from covid). Their explanation is equally as unconvincing as the cohort explanation which should show 0 death codes pre-2021 whereas we see a steady ~2k.
The sad truth is, that nobody knows who is vaccinated - and who is not.
This problem exists since the vaccination was invented.
Some German federal states lied upon the vaccination status of people in intensive care by counting people with unknown vaccination status as unvaccinated.
If I remember right, it was either Tom Lausen himself or the young mathematics experts in his video (who is said to be an islamist or with familiary bonds to islamism, and thus an enemy of the anti-islam-right-wing AfD) said it would be best to have marked on the papers for every dead if and when they got their shots.
That categorisation will only be possible if the vaccinations are in the system with their own ICD codes. Even if that is the case, the political move will be to designate the data as unreliable (vaccinations in doctors' offices vs vaccinations in vaccination centers; re-classification of J&J from "fully" to "partially" vaccinated; things like that).
Steve, the authorities around the world have been considering "vaccinated" to include those injected until a week or two after the second shot... all cause mortality spikes is the only real indicator IMO.
This has been dealt with and a rebuttal to the rebuttal posted by another German analyst who posted this video yesterday - sorry it is all in German but makes very good points and you maybe able to follow some of it https://youtu.be/nqtEBULPLAY
Thanks Howard, that was a nice simple analysis done on the substack article. This seems consistent with the fact that both covid and the vaccine are causing excess deaths (which makes sense given that the vaccine causes your body to produce the spike protein which seems to be the main part of the virus that causes harm).
You are welcome. A further complicating factor in all of this is the ‘stories’ emanating from the main narrative, or indeed ‘the science’ which we are supposed to believe. The ‘spike protein’ is an example of this. My own, admittedly limited, research tells me to be suspicious of claims that a variety of unobservable entities have in fact been verified and are able to do what they are claimed of doing. In this situation I feel it is better to focus on the ‘visible damage’ e.g. Burkhard and others histology slides plus verifiable statistics of dead and injured. Let’s leave it where we agree there is something very toxic in these substances and focus on establishing a causality. We don’t need ‘stories’ and the modern witchcraft of molecular testing for this.
A further point to all of this. These analyses are in the end just one more signal that something is not adding up and you have to be wilfully blind to miss all of this and do nothing about it. Here is my translation of German pathologist, Prof Arne Burkhatdt’s histological evaluation after looking at more than 40 cases of death attributed to the injections http://docs.shortxxvids.com/burkhardt_analysis.html
I would argue that all of this including all the media reposts of ‘sudden death’, large (not rare) reports of life changing injuries form a massive signal. The other side has no possibility to deny this and a responsibility to investigate it. The goal in Germany at least is to try to force this upon the responsible organisation, the PEI.
Thanks for that video. He made a few good points I added in.
At this point the only thing I'm stuck on is where the data for the excel sheet ZI made came from since it does not seem to match any of the other data I've looked at. The fellow in the video you sent me felt the same way and said that the source of the raw data needs to be made available since he suspect it is fraudulent...and I'm of the same opinion but also open to the fact I made a major oversight I am not aware of.
This does seem reasonable, I wonder if this "far right" political party is doing some well poisoning here. Post fraudulent data to make people dismiss any claims about the vaccine being harmful, effectively masking the fact that the real data does show a signal for the vaccine being dangerous, albeit less so than their doctored data would suggest. Definitely makes me suspicious that this political party could be some controlled opposition but I'm from the US so I'm not at all familiar with german politics. This tactic reminds me of the "died suddenly" doc by stew peters who is a known well poisoner, include a bunch of mis/disinfo to get people on the pro vaccine side to dismiss the possibility altogether.
In order to get a better understanding of the situation (well, at least that was the idea), I looked at the official death statistics that were published today:
"I wish we had an American political party stating the same."
Well, we don't, and that's NEVER going to happen.
Once people ask themselves why not, and then figure out who's behind the "why not," then we can start making more progress.
The government is not your friend. It's terminally disturbing to see so many of "the awake" working for it and supporting its demonic activities both domestically (as in domestic enemy) as well as globally. But hey, as long as all we care about is wealth/money, I guess we reap the rewards of our own personal choices.
Once people begin to see who really controls our country, then perhaps there will be some hope. Our government employed people are merely their executive officers, the pawns and stooges that they are, regardless of how "high" up the ladder.
I feel you have to work within the system (we have the best one in the world due to our constitution), and the US can do a mix of good and bad. All of the alternatives are much worse, and very few would go along with them because only a small portion is radicalized. It takes an immense amount of work to create a semi-non-corrupt and functional government, and you do not appreciate how much work goes into that until you are somewhere where the entire gov has fallen and you have none of the things you take for granted that govs do correctly. That said, I just try to stay out of the governments way as much as possible.
The government is defunct and terminally corrupt, and moreover and most importantly, not even controlled by our own politicians. Ergo, it's not the best. If it were, we wouldn't have our country all over the world attacking anyone and everyone in sight because they didn't adhere to our "form" of "democracy," which is really a sick demented form of corporatization of the world.
Anyone that doesn't understand that is lost.
We are waaaay past the point of doing anything to correct any of it per the warnings and remedies of some of the brighter Founders, like Patrick Henry, James Otis, or James Madison.
Government should be minimized, but given your statements about "creat[ing] a semi-non-corrupt and functional government ...," you should first ask yourself how it gets corrupt to begin with. That's an entirely different topic. Entirely.
Our government does very little correctly unless one considers death, destruction, and terminal corruption as being correct.
Either way, my statement seems to have completely eluded you. You obviously don't know, but there's no curiosity, no questions about it, etc. THIS is why we are screwed, because of the sheer and utter ignorance and lack of knowledge due to an incredibly successful indoctrination and demoralization campaign over the decades, coupled with a sheer and utter lack of people to become proactive, and not reactive.
Even things like this "Catastrophic Contagion" EVENT201 sequel excercise that just occurred, ... deja vu ..., very few question how a "pandemic" that hasn't occurred yet could be a surprise and unexpected pandemic.
Otherwise, and not even really scratching the surface here, but only addressing your commments that seem to indicate that we're the freeest country in the world, check out this piece posted today;
Clearly, it is important for people to know who really controls our country. I would like to learn the truth and so would many others. Please share this vital information. Who really controls our country?
I can only point you in the right direction. My experiences with this is that people have become so demoralized that as Yuri Bezmenov said, once that happens, you can show them the truth standing right in front of them and they refuse to believe it.
"Many others" that you cite, upon finding out that they cannot learn that information via Twitter and Instagram sized info bites, quickly bail. They don't have time for it. They have hours a week to watch crap on TV, or TV in general, but don't have a few hours/week to learn it. Of the hundreds that have expressed such an interest over the years, THAT'S exactly what happens when I point them in the right direction to the information, that's ALL readily out there.
To understand it you first have to understand who controls the money in our SYSTEM.
You also have to help yourself. If you want the info to be spoonfed to you, that's not going to happen. People would rather be entertained and not have to think to hard, much less shed the sheer and utter lies that they've been taught since birth, than to spend much time learning the truth about that.
If you're truly interested, we'll figure out a way to connect offline to eliminate the "noise," I'll assist you, and then you can see how easy it is to attempt to educate the masses.
I've been studying it for 30 years. I knew the moment that this PSYOP19 broke that it was a scam from top to bottom. Not one person, not even many of the "awake" believed me at that time. That should tell you something. The only one that I could discuss this with was a friend that I've been doing this with for just under 20 years.
But to merely lay the foundation, allow me to ask you, who owns our Federal Reserve? What's you immediate answer to that without looking anything up?
That will tell us all we need to know as to how much "digging out" needs to be done.
I’d love to find out if I’ve got a handle on this scheme. I try to explain it to people and either their eyes glaze over or they can’t grasp the enormity of the nefarious nature.
So in 1913 Wilson pushed through legislation that was crafted by a private cartel, in gratitude for their magnanimity (campaign contributions) toward getting him elected. Nothing ever changes? Today among others, the ones in our face are the insurance and pHARMa industries. In 1913 it was private bankers. Except it wasn’t so much in the face. It was done surreptitiously. In point of fact, most of what Katherine Watt has detailed about Congressional Acts and EOs “legalizing” suppression of The People’s rights has been done surreptitiously.
Anyway, the act of Congress in 1913 “created” (in reality the bankers created the whole scheme) a private bank, the Federal Reserve Bank, and gave it the sole authority to issue the country’s currency. The Constitution gives only the federal government this authority. The act of Congress is unconstitutional or extraconstitutional or supraconstitutional but everybody pretends it’s lawful. Going on 110 years.
So the short answer to the question is, the FED is a private cartel, a corporation. Originally it was a handful of bankers and industrialists that set it up. They may or may not have been the only owners. There may have been other international individuals or business entities. I’m not sure anybody knows for sure. Same today; nobody knows exactly who the private owners are.
And the arrangement between the private bank and the US government is usurious. Which mystery has never been solved. Was Wilson’s election the *only* reason the bankers finally succeeded (after trying since the birth of the nation) in inserting their system in our government?
I’ll hold my take on the usury and the fraud of credit creation, with bank “loans”, fractional reserve banking.
"Illuminati" is very general and abstract despite being true.
Anyone thinking that people like Gates, Soros, etc. are among the richest in the world are so incredibly off base by a country mile.
If people don't understand, as one mere tiny example, what D.C., The City of London, and The Vatican are and how they relate, then that's big too.
How many people realize that our entire government is a corporation and all of its departments and agencies corporations within that structure?
Again, it ALL comes down to their system of financial control, which is on the cusp of going fullbore checkmate for us.
But instead of understanding it and avoiding it, we seek to benefit from it. At the most basic level, consider how many people, particularly the "awake," work for the satanic anti-Christ-ian federal government, for pay/money/wealthy/financial security in all of its forms.
How many people invest in their phoney baloney stock markets instead of investing in the small businesses of each other? We're great with buying from small local companies, or better anyway, but that's chump change compared to the amount of money those same people voluntarily put into the PERPS' control mechanism.
Agian, one must first understand "WTH I'm even referring to" in order to understand that. Most people don't want to be bothered. I actually have more respect for people that tell me outright that they prefer "ignorance is bliss" than I do for those that claim to be interested, but cannot find a few hours/week to re-educate themselves on the topic, but who spend hours upon hours/week on their entertainment and amusement i our morally filthy entertainment framework in our country, and one that we now FULLY KNOW spawns and contributes to the most horrific child-trafficking horrors that the world has ever seen. SMH with sadness.
It shows via Yahoo Finance that several investment firms own a controlling % of shares in soooo many corporations. The firms are Blackrock, Vanguard & State Street.
2] Look up on wikipedia, about the people in key USA government positions.
For example:
Secretary of State: Antony Blinken
Secretary of the Treasury: Janet Yellen
Director of National Intelligence: Avril Haines
Attorney General: Merrick Garland
White House Chief of Staff: Ron Klain
Secretary of Homeland Security: Alejandro Mayorkas
... among others.
Notice their demographic information.
They come from a set of people who are less than 3% of the US population.
And others who don't, on the surface, are married or have close relatives in that sector.
Others from that 3% set own and control Big Tech: FB+IG [Zuckerberg], Google+YT [Sergey Brin and Larry Page], the Microsoft CEO, Dell, Oracle ...
Others from that set of people include ...
Rochelle P. Walensky, Director of the US CDC.
Anne Schuchat, Principal Deputy Director of the CDC.
COVID 'Czar' Jeff Zients.
US Health & Human Services, Ass. Secretary, Rachel Levine.
Pfizer's CEO, Albert Bourla
Johnson & Johnson's CEO Alex Gorsky.
Moderna's Dr. Tal Zaks
The Sputnik vaccine's Alexander Gintsburg.
Blackrock's CEO Larry Fink and President Rob Kapito.
And likewise for the USA mainstream media, and entertainment industry, people from that demographic own or work in the top positions across so much of it ...
You think there is a mote in my eye? Look at the beam in your own eye - members of the church of satan: Bezos Biden Clinton Dorsey Fauci Gates Hillary Macron Merkel 0bama Pelosi Podesta Schwab Trudeau
See, this is where people hang up. They go too fast down the rabbit holes and something that they have zero basis for considering may be true, and which rubs against what they've been taught all their lives, and they dismiss it and have their developing understanding stunted as a result.
I don't care for Baldmichael's writing or approach, there are far better and more effective ways to breach that topic.
It also depends upon who one thinks Christ was. Another topic altogether.
You two are missing some definitions however.
On this particular topic, and hardly where I'd point you at this stage of the process in seeking the truth, Larry Romanoff does among the best jobs of explaining much of it.
I've offered to work with you methodically, but if you insist on jumping ahead, read Romanoff's relatively recent piece here;
Surak asked a reasonable question so I told him the truth. Time is short. Anyway, looks like Surak doesn't like you either for some reason and why he should also call you Abdul is anybody's guess.
He could very well be a paid fed shill. Who knows.
At the end of the day he'll learn nothing because he's not open to the truth. The truth requires the unlearning of just about everything that we've been taught.
You may have told him the truth, but that's too much of a leap for the people at his stage of the learning process. He was raised on media education like most people, ... it's easy to turn on the TV and regurgitate narratives that you hear amongst your varying circles. It's much more difficult and time-consuming to go and look into things yourself.
Interestingly, speaking for myself, and presumably you similarly and implicitly, I once believed what he believes. I had ears to hear with and eyes to see with however, and my prayers were always for wisdom and truth, not money, success, career, etc. This is why the PSYOP19 (in 2023 now coming) works. Exactly because of people like him, who want the "truth," but only insofar as it doesn't disrupt his existing worldview too much.
.... again, or he's a paid fed, among which there are many out there.
This is why I don't work with people publicly, because like you, they're not truly interested in getting to the truth.
But since you know everything, and I'm assuming here that you passed 4th-grade math class? If not, please, read no further.
If you have however, then please, perhaps you can explain to all of us here reading this, how in ALL of Germany there were fewer than 1 million Jews, 6 million of those 1 million were killed, and yet, miraculously, OVER 5 million have now "survived." I'm truly interested in your simple mathematical breakdown there.
In the meantime, to contribute to the shattering of your existing world view there, as Mr. America, perhaps you can explain, amidst your defense as such, the situation with the USS Liberty. ... you've never heard of it, have you? Golly gee, I wonder why not. SMH
BTW, THIS is related to your question about the Federal Reserve.
The very first step in attempting to reveal to people how the control exists, is to tell them to watch this movie. It's highly entertaining and makes the perp the protagonist. It's a good watch even if you're only interested in some basic entertainment. Some of the details are amiss, but for the most part the general theme as to how it was initially done in the financial capital of the world at the time is on-point.
What are you talking about Surak? You are Jewish. Does that necessarily make you part of the synagogue of Satan? No of course not. Don't be so sensitive. You should look at the matter more carefully.
If you are seeking the truth then why should you be condemned by those who would seek to destroy the children of God.
Now unless I am somehow mistaken, you are of the children of God, not of the children of the Devil who are pretend Jews. It is what is in your heart, not the external appearances.
And I am not from Iran nor is my name Abdul, if you bother to look at my site you find this out. I follow Jesus Christ, and not Muhammad, as I am not mad.
Thanks to Dr. Midwest for recommending Kendrick. I highly recommend "Doctoring Data" for anyone interested in the games that the medical profession plays. Some of the examples in the book had personal relevance to me. I used to take rosuvastatin (Crestor). These clinical papers seem to deliberately hide certain data and it takes some skill to unmask it. In fact, Kendrick acknowleldges another doctor for helping him decipher the JUPITER study.
As a general rule, the paper (and the resulting promotions) will proudly proclaim (say) "33% reduction in heart attack and stroke" if patients take the medication. This is always a relative figure. If one looks at the absolute benefit, it is often a percent or two, or even less. I'm not claiming these drugs have no benefit, but it's much more modest, in most cases, than what Pharma would have one believe. They (usually) aren't lying, but they ARE being deceptive. You'll improve your chances of winning the lottery 100% by buying two tickets instead of one. But in most lotteries, you still have only a minuscule chance of winning.
I'm usually interested in finding the all-cause mortality in a trial. To me, that's an acid test: if a primary prevention treatment doesn't reduce overall deaths, what's the point in using it? (That said, there clearly are cases where a treatment's benefits might outweigh even serious side effects. For example, if I had to trade freedom from severe pain for my life expectancy being reduced by few years, I'd probably take it.)
In the rosuvastatin case, the was NO difference in overall deaths!
Since then, with the tools I've learned to use, I've looked at these meta-analyses and found similar conclusions. It's worth noting that these are VERY BIG studies, indeed among some of the largest done to date, so they claimed.
Primary prevention: almsot none (annual all-cause death reduced by 0.03%). Secondary prevention: this was an oddity in the study. Nowhere does it give that figure. I was able to derive it, but it was well hidden. I came up with 0.48%. What's weird is that aspirin is better at secondary prevention. So why would they hide its figure?
Do hypertension drugs as primary prevention really help? Not very much.
I come up with 0.18% annual all cause death risk reduction.
These are but two examples. You'll find a similar case with statins and no doubt many other treatments. As prevention, certain drugs may help, but the absolute numbers are often very tiny, even for secondary prevention. And rarely are adverse effects known, which might well swamp any small benefit.
Again, by no means saying all medicine is useless. I still brush and floss and see my dentist regularly, even though that's mostly "prevention." But absent convincing evidence, I'm done with "primary prevention" of hypertension, cholesterol and such.
Yes, makes sense as it is anti-oxidant it seems judging by chemistry I have just checked.
The main issues are always over-refined products, plants taken from the created world and then taken to toxic concentrations in processing. They then get bulked up so they can be repacked, re-branded and sold at a profit.
Plants contain other things to balance/dilute the potentially toxic effects. These are a lot cheaper and the big pharma scam is to persuade people to buy into their lies of "New, improved!"
FDA has just announced they are considered "unsafe" and cannot be considered GRAS. They now call them "drugs" altho for yrs they have said they are sugar pills - and will now start removing them one by one... I don't have the link to the article but I believe this happened last wk.
https://anh-usa.org/fda-declares-homeopathy-illegal/ Something to keep watching... they've been after supplements for decades and semi succeeded with NAC during covid... we're in hypervigilent mode these days, getting hit from all sides. :(
I am not surprised, they did every thing they could to hide any knowledge of natural cures or medicines and replaced them with drugs made from oil that don't work. All they cared about was patenting for exclusive money and repeated visits. It has been a long time since there were actual healers helping the population. Most doctors follow the medical industries drug prescription guide lines instead of using instinctive understanding to heal. Sad situation since around the 1900's.
More fear mongering. They can't shut down homeopathic pharmacies. They are already regulated by the FDA. They send out these fear stories every few years. If you are afraid, stock up on your remedies. They last forever. There are also remedy makers for home use.
I buy remedies from OHM Pharma here in the USA and I love Helios in the UK. Helios has had some that OHM doesn't but OHM carries all the Banerji Protocol remedies. I like to buy tinctures on Etsy. For those who are sensitive to alcohol, I look for ones in glycerine. There is so much information out there. Anyone can learn how to treat themselves and their families. I recommend Robin Murphy's Materia Medica and his Repertory. Also, Pharmacology and Homeopathic Materia Medica published by CEDH, they don't use any potencies higher than 30C, and Roger Morrison's Desktop Guide to Keynotes and Confirmatory Symptoms.
"...patented drugs are useless." Well, they do make large amounts of money for big pharma etc., create new patients, dumb down the general population so they can be exploited for more money.
But I guess that is not what you meant. "Let food be your medicine and medicine be your food."
Sometimes food is not enough. For example, someone who s suffering from PTSD is not going to be cured by chicken soup. That is why we have herbs and homeopathy. A simple common herb like Melissa Officinalis, commonly known as lemon balm, and frequently drunk as a calming tea, can be potentized into a gentle and effective anti-anxiety homeopathic medicine.
Yes, I didn't mean to exclude herbs and spices, I am not that narrow and I enjoy cooking anyway.
Someone suffering from PTSD needs TLC, or tender loving care, and that takes time. And thyme no doubt as it contains vitamin C, a useful anti-oxidant.
I have read about war veterans and PTSD with reference to the vaccines they are pumped full of. As they may change the body chemistry, I am sure this can be part of the problem.
Lemon and Melissa are both in my real full name, so perhaps I could be a balm.
Or as I play with words madly, just plain balm-y (sic)!
Dr Kendrick is excellent. Also his recent book "The Clot Thickens" is a wonderful source of alternative information for those who question the medical establishment's reasons for heart failures.
I appreciate Kendrick's work so I try to promote him since he just writes information he feels needs to get out on the side while he works as a doctor which is also my situation.
Exactly, you and I think alike. So how about the mortality in the Pfizer and Moderna "gold standard" clinical trials?
mRNA vaccines had 4 extra non-COVID deaths for every 3 less COVID deaths overall, i.e. 4 killed for every 3 saved, even during the deadliest Alpha wave in winter 2020-21. The separate Pfizer and Moderna trials both showed a 15-20% increase in non-COVID deaths, and specifically a 40-50% increase in cardiovascular-related deaths, with vaccine versus placebo.
I think you are incorrect. Aside from the massive and corrupt liability waiver, the system is supposed to be set up to prevent what we are seeing happening all around. As recently as 2010, it proved effective at halting a swine flu vax campaign after a small handful of deaths (fewer than ten I believe). Many drugs are recalled every year by the fda ... pharmacovigilance as a discipline has never required causal proof to formally reassess new drugs. There are, in place, layers of protocol to save us from what is happening all around us now. What the hell is going on??? Why have we suddenly departed from normal precaution? I have some ideas
An article I found recently is dated 2016-2017. The group that wrote it is from Italy.
They tested multiple vaccines like flu, HPV, meningitis, etc..to see what might be the cause of adverse reactions that occur.
They were shocked to find many different toxic chemicals & heavy metals in ALL of the vaccines except a feline veternary vaccine.
I noticed that most of these same chemicals & metals they listed were also found in all of the covid "vaccines" that have been tested. I firmly believe that it is intentional. There's no reason for these things to be in vaccines other than to poison and cause health issues.
Q: I have seen people saying that the vaccines permanently impair the immune systems of everyone who has gotten them and that each additional shot increases the degree of damage.
Moderna originally sought to use their mRNA technology in more lucrative areas than vaccines (which pre-Covid were considered to not be a huge moneymaker and more of a commodity).
They switched emphasis to vaccines in 2017 and Wall Street was not happy. The head of Moderna at the time was quoted (I am paraphrasing) that there were certain issues that arose in the animal trials at the dose levels for the applications they were looking at, and the switch to vaccines was because they were confident that those negative effects would not occur when mRNA was used in vaccines, BECAUSE PEOPLE ONLY EVER GET ONE OR TWO DOSES OF A VACCINE.
Now, they are telling people to boost constantly. How many boosters will it take to reach the cumulative dose level for Covid vaccines that that failed in the Moderna animal trials over safety, and couldn't even get approved for a Phase 1 human trial, let alone to be approved and given to millions of people?
Quick question. Is there any chance you would be able to send the current version of this article it Lausen (possibly translated to German) and ask him for commentary on it? I would really appreciate that. Some larger people want to send this out but I need to make sure it's good first.
You mean the blogpost you posted about the German insurance data? I can try it. Is there anything specific I should ask? (I have his email adress, because he sent me a thank you email, when I paypalled him a bit of support-money for his work a few months ago)
It presently has 70,000 views and will likely get a lot more once a few other people feel confident I did my due dilligence on this and it is worth sending along..
The things I would like to know are:
a) does he feel I made any major errors here.
b) does he feel there is anything I did not mention that needs to be included.
c) does he know where the spreadsheet ZI provided with their data from?
Unfortunately I only saved two links, and the Statnews article Carolin posted and this Science article appear to have scrubbed the direct quote from Bancel.
"But it has done so by promising a revolutionary technology safe enough to deliver repeated doses of mRNA.
The drugs it is pushing along now, by contrast, are more modest, relying on single administrations of mRNA. Beyond the four vaccines, it has one early-stage clinical trial targeting cardiac disease, launched just last month by partner AstraZeneca. The treatment involves a one-time dose and doesn’t use the tricky nanoparticle casing."
I think they are hanging on to the Covid booster idea (against all evidence) until they get their combined Covid/influenza vaccine done.
Then, that lets them start with a "clean slate" and buys them more years of making billions to jab people with substances that are ineffective at their main function of stopping a virus while causing massive amounts of side effects because they were insufficiently tested.
True, but testing will do no good. Poisons are poisons which ever way you look at it, and will never do what they say they do which is primarily train the immune system.
If we actually tested the vials properly we would find what was really in them. Typically this will be industrial waste as big pharma have to dump it somewhere, and our bodies as good as any place.
I have seen this happen, including a few very severe example, but it doesn't happen to everyone and I have no way to quantify the rate at which it happens.
Yes, simply think logically about it. The aim is to kill you, how better than to erase totally your immune system? Tough bugger though, it can't be done by one shot or even 4, but each subsequent shot does weaken it.
Okay, science facts: one thing the vax does is act as little shears for your cells. As you can see I'm not a scientist. Your DNA becomes changed. You can have myocarditis. unvaxxed people are at risk from vaxxed ones.-"shedding" of their dead skin. And the list goes on.
Find established fact that cant be questioned and you know where to begin questioning.
DNA was/is a globally invested technology that did not deliver promised/expected returns.
Like so much else of the 'science', it is spun out of a black box that is linked with or identical to 'dark research' be that military or corporate (its both).
Note 'Intelligence' is now a cloak of transnational security for a global biotech agenda. Upstream to what DNA dogma was supposed to reduce life to, is the realm of bio-electromagnetic field or bio-field. The research into this is the intent to weaponise and marketise 'applications' using nano-particles (which are a natural component in bio-function) but are being designed to 'gain function' from Nature so as to 'fix it' or 'improve and upgrade it'. Graphene Flagship being but one example.
Virology was falsely conceived, unfounded but so invested in as to be too big to fail. It retreated to pathological GENETIC modelling (black-box definitions - but WHO regulates or validates the elite institutions that announce them - often by press release!
So the biological model of life is the most pathological factor involved in all of this, but it is too big to fail as a compound global investment over generations - such that everything/everyone ELSE must be sacrificed to 'save it'. - albeit as a much more rigidly defined and controlled dogma.
The model assigns artefacts to life that either don't exist or introduce distortion filters by which to work against healing - ie as if to boost 'your immune system', or 'fix your genes'.
As for shedding (anything but toxic substances) - I not only question it's veracity but question the narratives used as 'science' for transmission by germs, or their imaginary nano counterpart viruses.
It isn't just elites who are invested in a pathological worldview, but the Many, whose investment is of a personal and social identity.
So a falsely founded identity in assumed science is compelled to look within the black box of its assumptions for what isn't there - excepting as a derivative pattern - which is pervasive and increasing evident to anyone with eyes to see as exactly like a usurping, hacking virus, or rogue parasitic cancer in its operation at the level of our minds, our currency of thought and our resulting feedback of interpretation we call the world.
If you are precise you cant say 'the vax' when there are known to be various batches of various brands kept and delivered and injected under various conditions, but I feel reasonable in asserting it is a toxic shock at least - for it has to be to qualify as 'generating an immune response'. (Discounting the known switch to saline placebo in at least some conscientious medical staff).
Shock can be also emotional or dare I say it 'psychic'. The overall emotional context for this agenda was of unprecedented and deliberate application of shock treatment to the goal of coercing such and outcome - either for the result of the injections themselves and/or the institutional structure of biotechnological status of bio-insecurity, that is no longer merely inadequate but a risk factor to the 'herd' collective and so no longer holding rights as an individual under 'contagion theory' running unchecked. (quite apart from carbon guilting or thought crime regarding other securitised narratives for economic control, through the enforcing of 'environmental, social and governmental' regulatory requirements.
Many think damage control is still feasible as part of an establishment set in an old normal. So I expect they will be used for such purpose as a tool of the intent to reset human beings as bio assets for experiment or whimsy.
Genetic control/eugenics is not just for depopulation agenda.
Very good and re "As for shedding (anything but toxic substances) - I not only question it's veracity but question the narratives used as 'science' for transmission by germs, or their imaginary nano counterpart viruses." I agree.
I consider it a fear tactic, a distraction whilst the elites continue to asset strip the nations. Money and control are the primary objective.
YES!!!! Stay away from vaccines............ALL OF THEM!!!
"The medical authorities keep lying. Vaccination has been an assault on the immune system. It actually causes a lot of illnesses. We are actually changing our genetic code through vaccination.....100 years from now we will know that the biggest crime against humanity was vaccines."
-Dr Guylaine Lanctor author of "The Medical Mafia"
"Much of what you have been led to believe about immunization simply isn't true. If I were to follow my deeper convictions, I would urge you to reject all inoculations for your child....There in convincing scientific evidence that mass inoculations can be credited with eliminating any childhood disease"
-Dr Robert Mendelsohn author of "Confessions of a Medical Heretic"
"These chronic diseases, including hay fever, asthma, cancer, and AIDS, are the result of wrong interventions upon the organism by conventional medicine.....the immune systems of the Western population, through strong chemical drugs and repeated vaccinations, have broken down.....medicine, instead of curing diseases, is actually the cause of the degeneration of the human race"
-Dr Juan Manuel Martinez Mendez writing in the Aug/Sept 2004 Townsend Letter
Personally I am not sure about permanent, as I am unaware if anybody has been fully analysed. Each shot will increase damage but depends on what actually is in each shot as we don't know for sure without testing each vial.
The cardiac CHEST PAIN (not deaths) case data was so bad for Scotland post dose of the under 40's Public Health Scotland COMPLETELY ERASED it !! No data now post July 2021. It has never been updated since. Unlucky for them i kept the old data before it was 1984'd. THIS is what we're up against ! +115% increse in chest pain cases IMMEDIATELY following dosing of the under 40's age range.
Thank you very much. Traitors indeed, I am in UK myself. Worth pointing out go to about 19:04:30 near the end as otherwise everybody will be put off by 19 hours!!!
"Because of this lag, it is possible to refute the commonly cited argument that these changes were due to COVID-19 or the lockdowns, as these only occurred in 2020 (the only possible exception I can think of is that Delta emerged near the end of 2020)."
I suspect they will still make this argument and cite the case numbers
They will just say these cardiovascular events are from "Long Covid" so they take months to a few years to form.
If the "vaccine" peddlers were serious about the safety & efficacy of their products, there would be double-blind RCTs all over the place in multiple countries by neutral parties. Instead we get only a few short-term RCTs, one of which Pfizer is being sued over by a whistleblower, with no proper adverse event reporting, and the authors of the studies were paid by Pfizer and/or Moderna and have investments in the companies. Conflict of interest much? And the results - which, in some cases, were outright unfathomably amazing: massive improvement with virtually 0 side effects (right...) - ended up being so definitive that the control group was hurriedly vax'd up like most of the rest of the population.
If their product was as great as they claimed it would be, there wouldn't have to be so much pressure to take it.
"You really don't want the jabs? Oh well, your loss!"
Nope. They didn't want any unjabbed controls around.
The change from Q4 2020 to Q1 2021 is an abrupt step function from one mode to another. By far the most likely explanation is a significant change/intervention within about a month of New Year's day 2021. Delta was still 6 months away. The onset of the pandemic was 9 months earlier. If covid itself was the cause with a time delay, the onset would have been gradual over perhaps 3 quarters due to the varied time from being sick with covid to onset of long-term symptoms. The variants at that time were not particularly different in their behavior from the Wuhan strain, probably because it was the vaccines themselves that sped up the evolutionary process. Can anyone think of another abrupt change around the 2020-2021 boundary? I for one am at a loss to come up with any hypothesis other than the covid vaccines.
I agree. The only possible alternative hypothesis I can think of was that the people in charge decided to switch on 5g when the vaccines were rolled out and have the vaccines act as a cover for that. I don't think that's what happened, but that is the only possible alternative hypothesis I have come across.
It's kind of a joke; it's also meant to illustrate I looked at everything that could explain this and could not find any explanation besides the vaccines.
I get the whole thing about how maaaaybe 5g turns on something within the Vax but that 5g could cause the kind of injuries associated with the Vax I wouldn't spend 5 seconds considering.
Doesn't have to effect the VAX..look up Dr Martin Pall research on emf causing oxidative stress through vgcc's and the ponder the impact of 5G (certainly at mm frequency)
Chemically change the body and you change the receptiveness to airwaves and psychological manipulation, like holding an analogue aerial improves radio signal. 5g may have role to play but there are so many airwaves it is one of many.
the tech we sort of know about is not just that 5g can be turned on, but that it can be used in various modes and intensities, that interact with mind and body functions. At the very least to interfere with functional integrity of the biofield/gel water with living systems, and in some cases to affect nanoparticulates - ie to ionic dispersal or molecular clumping. I don't know what is being sprayed in the skies - now officially - under 'weather control' or sun dimming or aerosol 'medications/vaccinations'. It's a black box. Just as the 'elitism' generates a sealed unit in which we are to operate with no user access - not unlike a rat maze in a lab.
So there's a few more far-out possible factors that might play into either the physical or the psychic realm of effects that are both in play.
I am aware that belief in a threat operates as effectively regardless of being real - especially once induced into defences given status of protecting or boosting immunity. So I lean to a world of lies going much deeper than we would think - for thinking was derived from them. But on a brighter note, the lie is only thus as a capacity to pass off as true. So uncovering the false is the freedom to now seek and find truth - not least by refining our questions from an expanding embrace of truth, lived felt and shared rather than 'modelled' for predictive control.
I still have not seen conclusive evidence it is not correct. Or more accurately, if it is the spike that is to blame, perhaps both infection and vaccination. Though clearly we know the spikes are NOT the same.
or it could be it is vaccination followed by infection.
I suspect if it was infection we would have seen evidence already by some key large systems.
they wont release that evidence if it is vaccination
It seems to me to be indirectly assayed by means of the same kinds of 'tests' as generated a test-demic. It is supposed to be produced (minus its virus body) by genetically modified human cells after injection and transfection (via nanotech hydrogels), for that is the stated purpose and function of the gene therapy-cum-vaccine.
But is that taken as fact because experts say? is it another case of cell debris being flagged as 'spike' protein - as a spiking narrative in a mutating novel?
I note the MSMedia(lockstepped as it is) & social media, pushing the memes of sudden death athletes and celebs WITHOUT assigning injections as suspects. This leads the public to 'join the dots' and set the belief as their own thinking - bases not unreasonably on distrust of the whole business of fearporn led globally orchestrated coercion. So while I do believe they are toxic, I am wary to being coopted into consenting against my will by mindless reactions.
In their terms the result they seek is a biosecurity state or a biotech revolution.
I translate this as bio-insecurity status set into technocratic controls even at the level of biological augmentation. In order to get consent I see a narrative of being irrevocably damaged to become a reset for original sin under a new Technate.
Again :- Belief something is so, can function as such, regardless truth - once invested in by reaction. Who has eyes to see is of a discernment in the heart of wholeness or integral sovereignty - that is - within life - not set over or as if apart.
Thank you again for your important and well researched articles. I certainly wish that we had an strong advocate here in Australia to counter the increasingly totalitarian approach of our federal and state governments and the TGA (our equivalent of the FDA)! I am really concerned about this development: https://www.theepochtimes.com/muzzling-medical-free-speech_4910748.html
I am saddened to just learn that a dear friend died of accelerated progressive cancer after the vax, age 65y, a wonderful caring oncologist. Last year a near relative died of aggressive metastatic colon cancer after decades of remission, following the vax.
I learned more than I wish I had to about cancer treatments when my mother and my best friend were both fighting long but ultimately unsuccessful battles with cancer several years ago.
One thing I remember as relevant to now is that my friend's standard treatment for AML was very dated chemotherapy, and one of the big areas of attack showing promise for leukemia treatment was immunotherapy.
This whole mRNA vaccine thing has gotten me wondering. What if our immune systems are even more vital to not getting cancer than we thought? What if our bodies are fighting off potential deadly cancers all of the time, way more than we thought?
If they can reprogram someone's immune cells (as in immunotherapy) to fight off a cancer that we know is trying to kill a person, maybe reprogramming someone's immune system to NOT fight off a cancer (because it focuses too much on worrying about a spike protein), is allowing cancers that people would have otherwise (with a normal immune system) never knew they even had instead grow to kill them?
Imagine that less than 3 years after giving a Nobel for working on how to use the immune system to fight cancer (which is a threat to everyone), scientists were lauded for hijacking that same immune system and getting it to ignore its other responsibilities to focus on stopping a virus that was no threat to most people.
I don't prefer the use of 'immune system' as such but of the natural homeostasis of a living system in maintaining its core functions amidst change and challenge.
I also lean to Hamer's understanding of cancers as 'biological shocks' that have both conflict and healing phases according to the nature of the shock and the organs affected - ie fear of death goes to the lungs.
But I note research on nagalese and GcMAF, such that one is in some sense supporting the 'cancer' growth and the other turns off to allow reintegration.
As with anyone achieving real results for those with cancers (especially the 'go home and die' stage), David Noakes and Lyn Thyer were subjected to thuggery.
While not about GcMAF, the thuggery was very clearly revealed in the documentary "Cancer is a Serious Business", freely watchable.
One we bought into an immune system, we had to keep it boosted!
But our sense of self and life can be shocked, undermined, depreciate and depleted under constant strain and set into recurring patterns of resetting the trauma such as to regress to an incapacity to sustain the conditions for living.
Well they had to shut down part of your immune system to get the thing in and working in you. To get it past the guards on the wall so to speak. Pseudouredine? plus? disables your immune system. Of course there are also the consequences of lockdowns. Less Vit D, stress, weight gain, sadness... all leads to weakened immune system. Makes me so mad. I am sorry about your mama and friend. That's quite a blow for one year.
The refusal of the "experts" to recommend lifestyle and diet changes even pre-vaccine, when they do that for almost every other medical condition, was along with their tossing of natural immunity the obvious factors that meant I was never buying into what they were selling.
Thank you for this thoughtful presentation of the data. When I see the graphs, I think of the massive number of individuals represented by the increases in injuries and death. I’m so sad that this has happened and so shocked that so many people have been complicit in allowing it to happen. I keep thinking that surely the end is near but there doesn’t seem to be an end.
More charts for my wall. Thank you, and also on behalf of my patients. Like a high school student doing a science project, I am considering creating a montage presenting ALL available data and just putting it in the waiting area.
Well, as a "dumb housewife" with no college education, I understand 90% or so...when you delve into the math of probabilities, my eyes glaze over, but other than that, I get it. Thank you for digesting the studies, and translating for us. I cannot imagine how you find time to practice medicine, let alone have a life outside of this work.
In the Pfizer and Moderna "gold standard" RCTs, the vaccine groups had 4 extra non-COVID deaths for every 3 less COVID deaths overall (compared to the placebo groups), i.e. 4 killed for every 3 saved, even during the deadliest Alpha wave in winter 2020-21. The separate Pfizer and Moderna trials both showed a 15-20% increase in non-COVID deaths, and specifically a 40-50% increase in cardiovascular-related deaths, with vaccine versus placebo.
RCT stands for Randomized Control/clinical Trial ?
BTW: my personal experience from having had both the 2019 winter flu shot (www.orwell.city archived articles tested it to be loaded with graphene oxide as part of the hydrogel) and first astra-zen jab shot (feb 2021--same batch number has caused worse symptoms in others) is that these c19 vaccines are bioweapons designed specifically to transform one's body into attacking itself over indefinitely via timed released and most likely 5G triggered destructive bio events. I have suffered from weakened immune system, scar/adhesions tissue attacking: my central nervous system, ligaments, muscles, skeletal system, and even some major organs; also reactivation of latent viruses in my heart, auto immune reaction causing hair loss, swollen breaststroke, swollen lymph glands, chronic fatigue.
These are not vaccines, these mRNA is a military managed program to reduce and control humanity worldwide. Watch video to learn that dod controls entire pharm industry via $45billion funding via B --A-R-D-A in this sobering presentation:
usa dod is running the entire pandemic for the purpose of getting toxic injections masked as vaccines injected which will cause the injected's immune system to attack itself, leading ultimately to a slow death for some and a sudden death for others.
Presentation by Sasha Latypova about DOD/HHS weapons programs, pharma contracts, BARDA accellerator programs, etc.INTENT TO HARM - EVIDENCE OF THE CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT MASS MURDER BY THE US DOD, HHS, PHARMA CARTEL
Hi "A MidWestern Doctor", I appreciate your analysis and I really appreciated you documenting the adverse events you personally saw in 2021. I read that article when it came out and it was one of the first documented evidence of harm I had seen. However, I need to point out a mistake I believe you made in this article. First, I will quote the deepl translation of the rebuttal you linked at the end of the article. Quote:
"Statement on the press conference of the AfD parliamentary group in the Bundestag
Yesterday, the AfD parliamentary group held a press conference to comment on billing data for panel physicians that had been evaluated and made available to them by the National Association of Panel Doctors (KBV). To this the chairman of the board of the central institute for the panel doctor supply (Zi), Dr. Dominik von Stillfried explains:
"The excitement about possibly increased deaths in 2021 lacks any basis. In fact, the development of the annual crude diagnosis prevalence after evaluation of the complete SHI-accredited physician billing data for the years 2012 to 2022 shows no conspicuities for the individual diagnosis codes highlighted by the AfD (ICD-10 codes R96-R98, I46.1, I46.9) in the entire period. There is no contradiction with the data used by the AfD. Rather, the phenomenon observed by the AfD is a logical consequence of the data evaluation. To our knowledge, Martin Sichert, a member of the Bundestag, requested contract physician billing data from the KBV in three steps:
In the first step, the data of all statutorily insured persons with health insurance who received an ICD coding for vaccination side effects (codes T88.1, T88.0, U12.9, and Y59.9) in 2021 were requested. For the insured population identified in this way, the second step was to list the frequencies of all diagnosis codes by quarter for the period 2016 to 2021. In the third step, the frequencies of all diagnosis codes for the remaining insureds with statutory health insurance (minus the insured collective covered under step 1) should be counted by quarters for the period 2016 to 2021.
In order to be able to compare the collectives in steps 2 and 3, the entire data set must refer to insured persons who have used at least one medical service in at least one quarter in 2021. Of these, logically, insureds may not die until 2021, for which corresponding codes cannot then be assigned until 2021. Thus, the apparent increase in codes for deaths is a logical consequence of data selection and methodologically known as the cohort effect. On the other hand, with the very rare occurrence of some codes for deaths in preceding years, this cohort may just be errors in entry or transmission."
End quote
What it sounds to me that they are saying, is that the sudden death codes (the plots you showed indicating a ~70 sigma increase) are simply an artifact of the way the reports were gathered. They are claiming that the numbers for the previous years should be 0 and if they are not then they must be errors in reporting because in order to get that data the researchers requested codes for those currently insured. Obviously you cant be currently insured if you are dead so its not an apples to apples comparison.. This would explain the absurdly high increase you saw (which is a consequence of this artifact in reporting, not a true indication of increase due to vaccines). It sounds like this issue would persist as well for the non-fatal codes, because you can imagine people having died since they had one of these codes, and thus not being included in the tally for the years 2016-2020. We would need that full historic dataset to get the true picture of any statistical increases (if any) seen. This is, of course, assuming what the rebuttal is saying is correct (which based on the sudden death codes, it does).
Thanks for your attention.
I pinned this because I want to get this question worked out (so try not to edit it). I gave my interpretation as a comment as well.
Another german Analyst: https://sciencefiles.org/2022/12/14/schmierentheater-um-impf-todesfaelle-aus-afd-praesentation-korrekte-ergebnisse-dumme-luegen-versicherungsbetrug-oder-ein-schrott-datensatz-unsere-analyse-der-daten/
I may be missing something, but their argument does not make any sense to me (and I want to make sure I have it right so I am not spreading any misinformation). To address the points you are raising:
1). The sudden death codes were being regularly used prior to COVID-19, and then suddenly spiked. This seems to negate the argument that they all should have been 0 and I don't think it makes sense to say "oh must have been an error."
2) A lot of non fatal codes showed up as well with that increase, although many other nonfatal codes did not increase. I agree that the extreme elevation of some indicates there is a potential data error here, but at the same time, I don't see how you'd get the cohort effect for people who were alive and a mix of what did and did not increase.
3) This is the most important, I think that they requested data of that cohort as an initial point off comparison, but in the data being shown here, it looks like all the codes for everyone are shown, so it needs to be clarified if AFD's data is for everyone or its an artificial cohort.
The question I think rests on which cohort they are using. According to the rebuttal, "In order to be able to compare the collectives in steps 2 and 3, the entire data set must refer to insured persons who have used at least one medical service in at least one quarter in 2021."
The way I interpreted this when I wrote my comment (and I don't know german so I'm relying on deepl translation) is that the cohort used were insured in 2021. And that is what I was basing my comment on. But they seem to be implying that its not only those insured in 2021, its those insured and used their insurance in 2021. However, looking over the data again there are ~2k deaths per quarter in the "sudden death" categories shown in that plot. This would seem to refute their argument, since although I could see a handful of deaths being mislabeled, 2000 seems like a lot (and it is too consistent for it to be just random data entry errors).
So I agree with your point 1). For your point 2), the increase could just be that people died before 2021 who also had those non-fatal codes. But thinking about this more again it is flawed because it would seem that non-fatal codes would decrease the farther back in time due to more people dying out before 2021, rather the trend we see seems reflective of what we'd expect from the overall population increase for people in the age range susceptible for these diseases. So after thinking about it more that also seems to refute their point about the cohort effect.
Thanks for your response, after thinking about it more I agree with you that it definitely does NOT seem to be explained by their cohort effect argument although I do think we should get more details on exactly what cohort they used (because the ~70 sigma increase is rather extreme and not in line with the increase of other codes).
edit: also I just want to point out how deceptive their rebuttal is... assuming that your arguments against the rebuttal are correct ( which I agree with), their argument is completely bogus and they must know this... its shameful that they would brazenly lie like this, because you know people will simply point to the rebuttal and just say its explained by the cohort effect and it will be case closed in their mind.
I'm German. The deepl translation of the "rebuttal" is quite good. The crucial point is the meaning of the "must":
- Are they saying that comparison/merging of the data subsets is impossible if the second does not consist of people who have used at least one medical service in 2021 only? That seems nonsense to me.
- Are they saying that KBV interpreted the request as a request for people who have used at least one medical service in 2021 only, and filtered the data accordingly? That would be an error on KBV's side, since the request is quite clear.
Anyway, note that the rebuttal has been published by the "Zentralinstitut für die kassenärztliche Versorgung in Deutschland", which is not the same (though probably connected somehow) as the "Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung" (KBV; who sent the data). In Germany, it is always more important to distance yourself from the AfD than to speak the truth.
So, did you find the AfD explanation convincing? Does KBV seem to be arguing in good faith? Who is creating a straw man or otherwise sowing confusion?
Danke schoen. (No umlaut on my keyboard, sorry.)
I think that there is a signal in the data. The above "rebuttal" is by Zi, not by KBV. KBV has put its own statement on its webpage:
https://www.kbv.de/html/2022_61368.php
Google translation:
"Statement of the KBV Board of Directors
Regarding statements at a press conference of the AfD parliamentary group on December 12, 2022
12/12/2022 - "There must be discussions and debates, but not in such a way that numbers are interpreted into something that they simply cannot give," explained Dr. Andreas Gassen, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians, also on behalf of his board colleagues Dr. Stephen Hofmeister and Dr. Thomas Kriedel. The KBV board thus took a position on today's statements at a press conference of the AfD parliamentary group in Berlin.
The KBV board makes it clear: Based on the accounting data or ICD-10 codes transmitted by the KBV to the AfD, no causal connections can be established between COVID-19 vaccinations and deaths. From the point of view of the KBV, the increase in deaths shown in quarters I-IV 2021 and quarter I 2022 is largely due to excess mortality caused by the pandemic. This once again illustrates the importance of the COVID-19 vaccination as an effective measure to prevent severe forms of the disease and even death. Without the vaccination, the excess mortality would probably have been far higher."
There's no mentioning of errors in Tom Lausen's analysis here, probably because there are none. They are just reiterating points made by Tom Lausen as well during the press conference ("no causal connections can be established between vaccinations and deaths").
Thank you for sending me this. I am going to add it to the article.
the increase in deaths shown in quarters I-IV 2021 and quarter I 2022 is largely due to excess mortality caused by the pandemic. This once again illustrates the importance of the COVID-19 vaccination as an effective measure to prevent severe forms of the disease and even death. Without the vaccination, the excess mortality would probably have been far higher."
Funny how this is almost verbatim the same conclusion in the Canadian article. Where have we seen this before?🤔
I think that I would reply as follows. First, evidence of undercounting of jab deaths has been established by autopsies, with [range]. If we wish to narrow this range, more autopsies will need to be done. Furthermore, the study of autopsies published by Schirmacher, et. al., show a need to change the autopsy procedure to rule out both covid and jab.
Second, without competently done autopsies, we have no means to ascertain the degree of undercounting of jab deaths.
Finally, any claim that excess mortality is simply due to covid is merely unsubstantiated opinion at a time when we need scientific data. In order to obtain this data, we must change the official autopsy procedure to include ruling out covid and jabs as cause of death by using immunostaining techniques when conducting autopsies of suspected jab and covid deaths. It is also time to establish how narrow we wish the range of uncertainty to be with respect to jab deaths and to perform sample autopsies accordingly.
Seems to me they have just told us how they are going to clean up the datacrime scene here.
Dead well obviously a dead person has no insurance so don't count that one.
Thank you! My current thinking is the criticism is justified. AfD screwed up. They should have asked for the ICD codes of the vaccinated and the ICD10 codes of the COVID unvaxxed by quarter. Then we can go to town. This is a real mess.
I am not sure if it would have been possible to provide that data because it's much easier to track all total codes received rather than categorize all of them by the source they came from.
Be aware there has also been a rebuttal of the criticism from another independent analyst who largely concurs with Lausen’s conclusions and does a number of ‘plausibility’ checks on the dataset which the AfD received. So I do not believe it is quite so simple to conclude this was an error from the AfD (although in Germany many would like to believe this because they are ‘framed’ as far right extremists) https://youtu.be/nqtEBULPLAY
Yep, this guy pretty much repeated the analysis. Main point there: contrary to the numbers of deaths with codes relatable to the jab, codes for deahs like suffocation did not show any rise. That means they cannot be explained as "errors" or whatever. That nullifies the supposed reason given by the ZI, and this time without error margin, of people dead in 2017 etc being treated in 2021.
Hi Steve, I'm not sure if you saw CM's comment above but KBV has their own official rebuttal. It doesn't mention anything about cohort issues, they just claim the spike in 2021-22 is just from covid. Seems to be the go-to explanation, blame it all on covid and if there is a discrepancy between excess mortality and official covid numbers, then the covid death numbers must be undercounted of course! (see this nature paper https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05522-2 ) . Its disturbing to me because many people including myself were predicting they'd just blame all vax deaths on covid and here we are. If there wasn't any clear link to covid then it must be the nebulous all encompassing "long covid" (which explains all possible strange health issues because almost everyone has caught covid at least once at this point).
In any case, I find their rebuttal unconvincing, where is the spike in ICD-10 codes in 2020 from the first wave? Why does it only increase after the jabs? They will say its because the delta wave was much worse in germany, but you can clearly see the delta wave starts in q4 of 2020 https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/daily-covid-cases-deaths?yScale=log&time=earliest..latest&country=~DEU . Also if its just from covid, why is the ICD-10 codes flat for 2021 meanwhile there are several spikes in death / cases due to "covid" not evenly distributed (ie q3 2021 should be much lower if its just from covid). Their explanation is equally as unconvincing as the cohort explanation which should show 0 death codes pre-2021 whereas we see a steady ~2k.
I‘m German.
The sad truth is, that nobody knows who is vaccinated - and who is not.
This problem exists since the vaccination was invented.
Some German federal states lied upon the vaccination status of people in intensive care by counting people with unknown vaccination status as unvaccinated.
If I remember right, it was either Tom Lausen himself or the young mathematics experts in his video (who is said to be an islamist or with familiary bonds to islamism, and thus an enemy of the anti-islam-right-wing AfD) said it would be best to have marked on the papers for every dead if and when they got their shots.
But this data is not collected.
In Germany. In 2022.
It‘s insane
Yes, there is some data regarding vaccination and ICU, but considerable uncertainty around it.
https://cm27874.substack.com/p/measurement-uncertainty
That categorisation will only be possible if the vaccinations are in the system with their own ICD codes. Even if that is the case, the political move will be to designate the data as unreliable (vaccinations in doctors' offices vs vaccinations in vaccination centers; re-classification of J&J from "fully" to "partially" vaccinated; things like that).
Steve, the authorities around the world have been considering "vaccinated" to include those injected until a week or two after the second shot... all cause mortality spikes is the only real indicator IMO.
This has been dealt with and a rebuttal to the rebuttal posted by another German analyst who posted this video yesterday - sorry it is all in German but makes very good points and you maybe able to follow some of it https://youtu.be/nqtEBULPLAY
Further, there has been this piece from Prof Norman Fenton coming from PANDA (in English). It is also relevant https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com/p/the-devils-advocate-an-exploratory
Thanks Howard, that was a nice simple analysis done on the substack article. This seems consistent with the fact that both covid and the vaccine are causing excess deaths (which makes sense given that the vaccine causes your body to produce the spike protein which seems to be the main part of the virus that causes harm).
You are welcome. A further complicating factor in all of this is the ‘stories’ emanating from the main narrative, or indeed ‘the science’ which we are supposed to believe. The ‘spike protein’ is an example of this. My own, admittedly limited, research tells me to be suspicious of claims that a variety of unobservable entities have in fact been verified and are able to do what they are claimed of doing. In this situation I feel it is better to focus on the ‘visible damage’ e.g. Burkhard and others histology slides plus verifiable statistics of dead and injured. Let’s leave it where we agree there is something very toxic in these substances and focus on establishing a causality. We don’t need ‘stories’ and the modern witchcraft of molecular testing for this.
A further point to all of this. These analyses are in the end just one more signal that something is not adding up and you have to be wilfully blind to miss all of this and do nothing about it. Here is my translation of German pathologist, Prof Arne Burkhatdt’s histological evaluation after looking at more than 40 cases of death attributed to the injections http://docs.shortxxvids.com/burkhardt_analysis.html
I would argue that all of this including all the media reposts of ‘sudden death’, large (not rare) reports of life changing injuries form a massive signal. The other side has no possibility to deny this and a responsibility to investigate it. The goal in Germany at least is to try to force this upon the responsible organisation, the PEI.
Thanks for that video. He made a few good points I added in.
At this point the only thing I'm stuck on is where the data for the excel sheet ZI made came from since it does not seem to match any of the other data I've looked at. The fellow in the video you sent me felt the same way and said that the source of the raw data needs to be made available since he suspect it is fraudulent...and I'm of the same opinion but also open to the fact I made a major oversight I am not aware of.
This does seem reasonable, I wonder if this "far right" political party is doing some well poisoning here. Post fraudulent data to make people dismiss any claims about the vaccine being harmful, effectively masking the fact that the real data does show a signal for the vaccine being dangerous, albeit less so than their doctored data would suggest. Definitely makes me suspicious that this political party could be some controlled opposition but I'm from the US so I'm not at all familiar with german politics. This tactic reminds me of the "died suddenly" doc by stew peters who is a known well poisoner, include a bunch of mis/disinfo to get people on the pro vaccine side to dismiss the possibility altogether.
One can/could download the original data in a PDF . This guy has done it
https://youtu.be/nqtEBULPLAY
got equivalent results, plus destroyed the pseudo-explanation of the ZI by looking at "normal" death codes like suffocation.
In order to get a better understanding of the situation (well, at least that was the idea), I looked at the official death statistics that were published today:
https://cm27874.substack.com/p/german-deaths-2019-2021
"I wish we had an American political party stating the same."
Well, we don't, and that's NEVER going to happen.
Once people ask themselves why not, and then figure out who's behind the "why not," then we can start making more progress.
The government is not your friend. It's terminally disturbing to see so many of "the awake" working for it and supporting its demonic activities both domestically (as in domestic enemy) as well as globally. But hey, as long as all we care about is wealth/money, I guess we reap the rewards of our own personal choices.
Once people begin to see who really controls our country, then perhaps there will be some hope. Our government employed people are merely their executive officers, the pawns and stooges that they are, regardless of how "high" up the ladder.
I feel you have to work within the system (we have the best one in the world due to our constitution), and the US can do a mix of good and bad. All of the alternatives are much worse, and very few would go along with them because only a small portion is radicalized. It takes an immense amount of work to create a semi-non-corrupt and functional government, and you do not appreciate how much work goes into that until you are somewhere where the entire gov has fallen and you have none of the things you take for granted that govs do correctly. That said, I just try to stay out of the governments way as much as possible.
The government is defunct and terminally corrupt, and moreover and most importantly, not even controlled by our own politicians. Ergo, it's not the best. If it were, we wouldn't have our country all over the world attacking anyone and everyone in sight because they didn't adhere to our "form" of "democracy," which is really a sick demented form of corporatization of the world.
Anyone that doesn't understand that is lost.
We are waaaay past the point of doing anything to correct any of it per the warnings and remedies of some of the brighter Founders, like Patrick Henry, James Otis, or James Madison.
Government should be minimized, but given your statements about "creat[ing] a semi-non-corrupt and functional government ...," you should first ask yourself how it gets corrupt to begin with. That's an entirely different topic. Entirely.
Our government does very little correctly unless one considers death, destruction, and terminal corruption as being correct.
Either way, my statement seems to have completely eluded you. You obviously don't know, but there's no curiosity, no questions about it, etc. THIS is why we are screwed, because of the sheer and utter ignorance and lack of knowledge due to an incredibly successful indoctrination and demoralization campaign over the decades, coupled with a sheer and utter lack of people to become proactive, and not reactive.
Even things like this "Catastrophic Contagion" EVENT201 sequel excercise that just occurred, ... deja vu ..., very few question how a "pandemic" that hasn't occurred yet could be a surprise and unexpected pandemic.
Otherwise, and not even really scratching the surface here, but only addressing your commments that seem to indicate that we're the freeest country in the world, check out this piece posted today;
http://www.stationgossip.com/2022/12/top-7-ways-usa-is-already-under.html
https://twitter.com/p_mcculloughmd/status/1602755217426157569?s=52&t=OnVzQU-iH9OjN_eob3n6Pw
I appreciate this comment and understand it comes from experience.
Clearly, it is important for people to know who really controls our country. I would like to learn the truth and so would many others. Please share this vital information. Who really controls our country?
I can only point you in the right direction. My experiences with this is that people have become so demoralized that as Yuri Bezmenov said, once that happens, you can show them the truth standing right in front of them and they refuse to believe it.
"Many others" that you cite, upon finding out that they cannot learn that information via Twitter and Instagram sized info bites, quickly bail. They don't have time for it. They have hours a week to watch crap on TV, or TV in general, but don't have a few hours/week to learn it. Of the hundreds that have expressed such an interest over the years, THAT'S exactly what happens when I point them in the right direction to the information, that's ALL readily out there.
To understand it you first have to understand who controls the money in our SYSTEM.
You also have to help yourself. If you want the info to be spoonfed to you, that's not going to happen. People would rather be entertained and not have to think to hard, much less shed the sheer and utter lies that they've been taught since birth, than to spend much time learning the truth about that.
If you're truly interested, we'll figure out a way to connect offline to eliminate the "noise," I'll assist you, and then you can see how easy it is to attempt to educate the masses.
I've been studying it for 30 years. I knew the moment that this PSYOP19 broke that it was a scam from top to bottom. Not one person, not even many of the "awake" believed me at that time. That should tell you something. The only one that I could discuss this with was a friend that I've been doing this with for just under 20 years.
But to merely lay the foundation, allow me to ask you, who owns our Federal Reserve? What's you immediate answer to that without looking anything up?
That will tell us all we need to know as to how much "digging out" needs to be done.
Who owns our Federal Reserve? Banks. Is that the answer to the original question? Banks control America?
What IS the Federal Reserve? Let's start there ...
The largest ponzi scheme ever
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-plan-revealed
Notice that the one asking the question didn't answer.
I'm guessing he's a paid fed shill/troll.
Yes, but that doesn't answer the question.
I’d love to find out if I’ve got a handle on this scheme. I try to explain it to people and either their eyes glaze over or they can’t grasp the enormity of the nefarious nature.
So in 1913 Wilson pushed through legislation that was crafted by a private cartel, in gratitude for their magnanimity (campaign contributions) toward getting him elected. Nothing ever changes? Today among others, the ones in our face are the insurance and pHARMa industries. In 1913 it was private bankers. Except it wasn’t so much in the face. It was done surreptitiously. In point of fact, most of what Katherine Watt has detailed about Congressional Acts and EOs “legalizing” suppression of The People’s rights has been done surreptitiously.
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/american-domestic-bioterrorism-program
Anyway, the act of Congress in 1913 “created” (in reality the bankers created the whole scheme) a private bank, the Federal Reserve Bank, and gave it the sole authority to issue the country’s currency. The Constitution gives only the federal government this authority. The act of Congress is unconstitutional or extraconstitutional or supraconstitutional but everybody pretends it’s lawful. Going on 110 years.
So the short answer to the question is, the FED is a private cartel, a corporation. Originally it was a handful of bankers and industrialists that set it up. They may or may not have been the only owners. There may have been other international individuals or business entities. I’m not sure anybody knows for sure. Same today; nobody knows exactly who the private owners are.
And the arrangement between the private bank and the US government is usurious. Which mystery has never been solved. Was Wilson’s election the *only* reason the bankers finally succeeded (after trying since the birth of the nation) in inserting their system in our government?
I’ll hold my take on the usury and the fraud of credit creation, with bank “loans”, fractional reserve banking.
Am I on the right track?
Nope
Ultimately, the Illuminati.
There are so many control mechanisms.
"Illuminati" is very general and abstract despite being true.
Anyone thinking that people like Gates, Soros, etc. are among the richest in the world are so incredibly off base by a country mile.
If people don't understand, as one mere tiny example, what D.C., The City of London, and The Vatican are and how they relate, then that's big too.
How many people realize that our entire government is a corporation and all of its departments and agencies corporations within that structure?
Again, it ALL comes down to their system of financial control, which is on the cusp of going fullbore checkmate for us.
But instead of understanding it and avoiding it, we seek to benefit from it. At the most basic level, consider how many people, particularly the "awake," work for the satanic anti-Christ-ian federal government, for pay/money/wealthy/financial security in all of its forms.
How many people invest in their phoney baloney stock markets instead of investing in the small businesses of each other? We're great with buying from small local companies, or better anyway, but that's chump change compared to the amount of money those same people voluntarily put into the PERPS' control mechanism.
Agian, one must first understand "WTH I'm even referring to" in order to understand that. Most people don't want to be bothered. I actually have more respect for people that tell me outright that they prefer "ignorance is bliss" than I do for those that claim to be interested, but cannot find a few hours/week to re-educate themselves on the topic, but who spend hours upon hours/week on their entertainment and amusement i our morally filthy entertainment framework in our country, and one that we now FULLY KNOW spawns and contributes to the most horrific child-trafficking horrors that the world has ever seen. SMH with sadness.
Right on spot, here's one confessing their crimes:
1 of 5 (don't miss the 5th):
http://youtu.be/JAhnCdXqPww
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-plan-revealed
I found the following enlightening ...
1] The clip titled “MONOPOLY: Who Owns The World?" on bitchute.com and rumble.com.
It shows via Yahoo Finance that several investment firms own a controlling % of shares in soooo many corporations. The firms are Blackrock, Vanguard & State Street.
2] Look up on wikipedia, about the people in key USA government positions.
For example:
Secretary of State: Antony Blinken
Secretary of the Treasury: Janet Yellen
Director of National Intelligence: Avril Haines
Attorney General: Merrick Garland
White House Chief of Staff: Ron Klain
Secretary of Homeland Security: Alejandro Mayorkas
... among others.
Notice their demographic information.
They come from a set of people who are less than 3% of the US population.
And others who don't, on the surface, are married or have close relatives in that sector.
Others from that 3% set own and control Big Tech: FB+IG [Zuckerberg], Google+YT [Sergey Brin and Larry Page], the Microsoft CEO, Dell, Oracle ...
Others from that set of people include ...
Rochelle P. Walensky, Director of the US CDC.
Anne Schuchat, Principal Deputy Director of the CDC.
COVID 'Czar' Jeff Zients.
US Health & Human Services, Ass. Secretary, Rachel Levine.
Pfizer's CEO, Albert Bourla
Johnson & Johnson's CEO Alex Gorsky.
Moderna's Dr. Tal Zaks
The Sputnik vaccine's Alexander Gintsburg.
Blackrock's CEO Larry Fink and President Rob Kapito.
And likewise for the USA mainstream media, and entertainment industry, people from that demographic own or work in the top positions across so much of it ...
The CIA and the mafia. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jdm20ncMCvU
They're part of the operation, far from the head of that pyramid, FAR from it. They're mere tools.
You think there is a mote in my eye? Look at the beam in your own eye - members of the church of satan: Bezos Biden Clinton Dorsey Fauci Gates Hillary Macron Merkel 0bama Pelosi Podesta Schwab Trudeau
Go back to iran abdul
See, this is where people hang up. They go too fast down the rabbit holes and something that they have zero basis for considering may be true, and which rubs against what they've been taught all their lives, and they dismiss it and have their developing understanding stunted as a result.
I don't care for Baldmichael's writing or approach, there are far better and more effective ways to breach that topic.
It also depends upon who one thinks Christ was. Another topic altogether.
You two are missing some definitions however.
On this particular topic, and hardly where I'd point you at this stage of the process in seeking the truth, Larry Romanoff does among the best jobs of explaining much of it.
I've offered to work with you methodically, but if you insist on jumping ahead, read Romanoff's relatively recent piece here;
https://www.unz.com/lromanoff/jews-and-revolutions/
Surak asked a reasonable question so I told him the truth. Time is short. Anyway, looks like Surak doesn't like you either for some reason and why he should also call you Abdul is anybody's guess.
He may be a troll.
He could very well be a paid fed shill. Who knows.
At the end of the day he'll learn nothing because he's not open to the truth. The truth requires the unlearning of just about everything that we've been taught.
You may have told him the truth, but that's too much of a leap for the people at his stage of the learning process. He was raised on media education like most people, ... it's easy to turn on the TV and regurgitate narratives that you hear amongst your varying circles. It's much more difficult and time-consuming to go and look into things yourself.
Interestingly, speaking for myself, and presumably you similarly and implicitly, I once believed what he believes. I had ears to hear with and eyes to see with however, and my prayers were always for wisdom and truth, not money, success, career, etc. This is why the PSYOP19 (in 2023 now coming) works. Exactly because of people like him, who want the "truth," but only insofar as it doesn't disrupt his existing worldview too much.
.... again, or he's a paid fed, among which there are many out there.
Not interested in a Holocaust denial website. Get lost, abdul.
And please, stop asking questions if you're not open to receiving the answers, as challenging for your brain they may be.
This is why I don't work with people publicly, because like you, they're not truly interested in getting to the truth.
But since you know everything, and I'm assuming here that you passed 4th-grade math class? If not, please, read no further.
If you have however, then please, perhaps you can explain to all of us here reading this, how in ALL of Germany there were fewer than 1 million Jews, 6 million of those 1 million were killed, and yet, miraculously, OVER 5 million have now "survived." I'm truly interested in your simple mathematical breakdown there.
In the meantime, to contribute to the shattering of your existing world view there, as Mr. America, perhaps you can explain, amidst your defense as such, the situation with the USS Liberty. ... you've never heard of it, have you? Golly gee, I wonder why not. SMH
Anyway, enjoy there Captain America!
BTW, THIS is related to your question about the Federal Reserve.
The very first step in attempting to reveal to people how the control exists, is to tell them to watch this movie. It's highly entertaining and makes the perp the protagonist. It's a good watch even if you're only interested in some basic entertainment. Some of the details are amiss, but for the most part the general theme as to how it was initially done in the financial capital of the world at the time is on-point.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/eZzOAV1ECjg8/
Let me know when you've viewed it, I'll send you the next. I'd still like your answer to What is the Fed in the other posts.
What are you talking about Surak? You are Jewish. Does that necessarily make you part of the synagogue of Satan? No of course not. Don't be so sensitive. You should look at the matter more carefully.
If you are seeking the truth then why should you be condemned by those who would seek to destroy the children of God.
Now unless I am somehow mistaken, you are of the children of God, not of the children of the Devil who are pretend Jews. It is what is in your heart, not the external appearances.
And I am not from Iran nor is my name Abdul, if you bother to look at my site you find this out. I follow Jesus Christ, and not Muhammad, as I am not mad.
Thanks to Dr. Midwest for recommending Kendrick. I highly recommend "Doctoring Data" for anyone interested in the games that the medical profession plays. Some of the examples in the book had personal relevance to me. I used to take rosuvastatin (Crestor). These clinical papers seem to deliberately hide certain data and it takes some skill to unmask it. In fact, Kendrick acknowleldges another doctor for helping him decipher the JUPITER study.
As a general rule, the paper (and the resulting promotions) will proudly proclaim (say) "33% reduction in heart attack and stroke" if patients take the medication. This is always a relative figure. If one looks at the absolute benefit, it is often a percent or two, or even less. I'm not claiming these drugs have no benefit, but it's much more modest, in most cases, than what Pharma would have one believe. They (usually) aren't lying, but they ARE being deceptive. You'll improve your chances of winning the lottery 100% by buying two tickets instead of one. But in most lotteries, you still have only a minuscule chance of winning.
I'm usually interested in finding the all-cause mortality in a trial. To me, that's an acid test: if a primary prevention treatment doesn't reduce overall deaths, what's the point in using it? (That said, there clearly are cases where a treatment's benefits might outweigh even serious side effects. For example, if I had to trade freedom from severe pain for my life expectancy being reduced by few years, I'd probably take it.)
In the rosuvastatin case, the was NO difference in overall deaths!
Since then, with the tools I've learned to use, I've looked at these meta-analyses and found similar conclusions. It's worth noting that these are VERY BIG studies, indeed among some of the largest done to date, so they claimed.
The very few benefits of aspirin therapy:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2715005/
Primary prevention: almsot none (annual all-cause death reduced by 0.03%). Secondary prevention: this was an oddity in the study. Nowhere does it give that figure. I was able to derive it, but it was well hidden. I came up with 0.48%. What's weird is that aspirin is better at secondary prevention. So why would they hide its figure?
Do hypertension drugs as primary prevention really help? Not very much.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00590-0/fulltext
I come up with 0.18% annual all cause death risk reduction.
These are but two examples. You'll find a similar case with statins and no doubt many other treatments. As prevention, certain drugs may help, but the absolute numbers are often very tiny, even for secondary prevention. And rarely are adverse effects known, which might well swamp any small benefit.
Again, by no means saying all medicine is useless. I still brush and floss and see my dentist regularly, even though that's mostly "prevention." But absent convincing evidence, I'm done with "primary prevention" of hypertension, cholesterol and such.
Great points. Fortunately the medical field is starting to come around on giving everyone aspirin.
Oddly enough though, I have seen aspirin help the vaccine injured!
Yes, makes sense as it is anti-oxidant it seems judging by chemistry I have just checked.
The main issues are always over-refined products, plants taken from the created world and then taken to toxic concentrations in processing. They then get bulked up so they can be repacked, re-branded and sold at a profit.
Plants contain other things to balance/dilute the potentially toxic effects. These are a lot cheaper and the big pharma scam is to persuade people to buy into their lies of "New, improved!"
Ha ha, I have no qualms claiming that patented drugs are useless. They are not medicine. Homeopathy and botanicals are the true medicine.
Which is why the FDA is trying to take them down!
FDA has just announced they are considered "unsafe" and cannot be considered GRAS. They now call them "drugs" altho for yrs they have said they are sugar pills - and will now start removing them one by one... I don't have the link to the article but I believe this happened last wk.
Please share the link if you find it. This is an issue of great concern to me.
https://anh-usa.org/fda-declares-homeopathy-illegal/ Something to keep watching... they've been after supplements for decades and semi succeeded with NAC during covid... we're in hypervigilent mode these days, getting hit from all sides. :(
Thank you
Organic Consumers Association has the article on their Organic bites.
Organic Consumers Association has the article ion their Organic Bytes.
According to The Organic Consumers Association they are now outlawing homeopathic remedies.
They will have to go through the expensive FDA approval process to be allowed back on the market. I have read that standard supplements are next.
I am not surprised, they did every thing they could to hide any knowledge of natural cures or medicines and replaced them with drugs made from oil that don't work. All they cared about was patenting for exclusive money and repeated visits. It has been a long time since there were actual healers helping the population. Most doctors follow the medical industries drug prescription guide lines instead of using instinctive understanding to heal. Sad situation since around the 1900's.
I believe that healers will inherit the mess that is becoming our world. Who will trust anyone else?
I agree with all you have stated.
More fear mongering. They can't shut down homeopathic pharmacies. They are already regulated by the FDA. They send out these fear stories every few years. If you are afraid, stock up on your remedies. They last forever. There are also remedy makers for home use.
Did you read the article? It shows the path to squashing the industry.
Have you found any favorites on Etsy or any other freer market place? Thanks.
I buy remedies from OHM Pharma here in the USA and I love Helios in the UK. Helios has had some that OHM doesn't but OHM carries all the Banerji Protocol remedies. I like to buy tinctures on Etsy. For those who are sensitive to alcohol, I look for ones in glycerine. There is so much information out there. Anyone can learn how to treat themselves and their families. I recommend Robin Murphy's Materia Medica and his Repertory. Also, Pharmacology and Homeopathic Materia Medica published by CEDH, they don't use any potencies higher than 30C, and Roger Morrison's Desktop Guide to Keynotes and Confirmatory Symptoms.
THANK YOU!
"...patented drugs are useless." Well, they do make large amounts of money for big pharma etc., create new patients, dumb down the general population so they can be exploited for more money.
But I guess that is not what you meant. "Let food be your medicine and medicine be your food."
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/11/14/vaccination-industry-in-a-nutshell/
Sometimes food is not enough. For example, someone who s suffering from PTSD is not going to be cured by chicken soup. That is why we have herbs and homeopathy. A simple common herb like Melissa Officinalis, commonly known as lemon balm, and frequently drunk as a calming tea, can be potentized into a gentle and effective anti-anxiety homeopathic medicine.
Yes, I didn't mean to exclude herbs and spices, I am not that narrow and I enjoy cooking anyway.
Someone suffering from PTSD needs TLC, or tender loving care, and that takes time. And thyme no doubt as it contains vitamin C, a useful anti-oxidant.
I have read about war veterans and PTSD with reference to the vaccines they are pumped full of. As they may change the body chemistry, I am sure this can be part of the problem.
Lemon and Melissa are both in my real full name, so perhaps I could be a balm.
Or as I play with words madly, just plain balm-y (sic)!
Dr Kendrick is excellent. Also his recent book "The Clot Thickens" is a wonderful source of alternative information for those who question the medical establishment's reasons for heart failures.
I appreciate Kendrick's work so I try to promote him since he just writes information he feels needs to get out on the side while he works as a doctor which is also my situation.
Exactly, you and I think alike. So how about the mortality in the Pfizer and Moderna "gold standard" clinical trials?
mRNA vaccines had 4 extra non-COVID deaths for every 3 less COVID deaths overall, i.e. 4 killed for every 3 saved, even during the deadliest Alpha wave in winter 2020-21. The separate Pfizer and Moderna trials both showed a 15-20% increase in non-COVID deaths, and specifically a 40-50% increase in cardiovascular-related deaths, with vaccine versus placebo.
I think you are incorrect. Aside from the massive and corrupt liability waiver, the system is supposed to be set up to prevent what we are seeing happening all around. As recently as 2010, it proved effective at halting a swine flu vax campaign after a small handful of deaths (fewer than ten I believe). Many drugs are recalled every year by the fda ... pharmacovigilance as a discipline has never required causal proof to formally reassess new drugs. There are, in place, layers of protocol to save us from what is happening all around us now. What the hell is going on??? Why have we suddenly departed from normal precaution? I have some ideas
The global predators hijacked the system when COVID started.
Slightly before, I think.
I started seeing FDA approve things from Phase II trials in 2017 & 2018. I mean, WTF?
An article I found recently is dated 2016-2017. The group that wrote it is from Italy.
They tested multiple vaccines like flu, HPV, meningitis, etc..to see what might be the cause of adverse reactions that occur.
They were shocked to find many different toxic chemicals & heavy metals in ALL of the vaccines except a feline veternary vaccine.
I noticed that most of these same chemicals & metals they listed were also found in all of the covid "vaccines" that have been tested. I firmly believe that it is intentional. There's no reason for these things to be in vaccines other than to poison and cause health issues.
https://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/new-quality-control-investigations-on-vaccines-micro--and-nanocontamination.html
They have been preparing for decades, since WW2, if not before. But yes, they sprung the trap, or commenced the full operation in 2020.
Q: I have seen people saying that the vaccines permanently impair the immune systems of everyone who has gotten them and that each additional shot increases the degree of damage.
Is that correct?
Moderna originally sought to use their mRNA technology in more lucrative areas than vaccines (which pre-Covid were considered to not be a huge moneymaker and more of a commodity).
They switched emphasis to vaccines in 2017 and Wall Street was not happy. The head of Moderna at the time was quoted (I am paraphrasing) that there were certain issues that arose in the animal trials at the dose levels for the applications they were looking at, and the switch to vaccines was because they were confident that those negative effects would not occur when mRNA was used in vaccines, BECAUSE PEOPLE ONLY EVER GET ONE OR TWO DOSES OF A VACCINE.
Now, they are telling people to boost constantly. How many boosters will it take to reach the cumulative dose level for Covid vaccines that that failed in the Moderna animal trials over safety, and couldn't even get approved for a Phase 1 human trial, let alone to be approved and given to millions of people?
Could you send me the reference for this? I would really appreciate it to use in an article.
https://www.statnews.com/2017/01/10/moderna-trouble-mrna/
Quick question. Is there any chance you would be able to send the current version of this article it Lausen (possibly translated to German) and ask him for commentary on it? I would really appreciate that. Some larger people want to send this out but I need to make sure it's good first.
You mean the blogpost you posted about the German insurance data? I can try it. Is there anything specific I should ask? (I have his email adress, because he sent me a thank you email, when I paypalled him a bit of support-money for his work a few months ago)
Yes, this post: https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/the-most-important-dataset-of-the
It presently has 70,000 views and will likely get a lot more once a few other people feel confident I did my due dilligence on this and it is worth sending along..
The things I would like to know are:
a) does he feel I made any major errors here.
b) does he feel there is anything I did not mention that needs to be included.
c) does he know where the spreadsheet ZI provided with their data from?
https://www.zi.de/fileadmin/images/content/PMs/Diagnosepraevalenzen_roh_2022-12-13.xlsx
I can't see how they could have arrived at that data.
d) does he have any comment on ZI's allegation that the cohort effect invalidates his argument for an increase in deaths?
Unfortunately I only saved two links, and the Statnews article Carolin posted and this Science article appear to have scrubbed the direct quote from Bancel.
https://www.science.org/content/article/mysterious-2-billion-biotech-revealing-secrets-behind-its-new-drugs-and-vaccines
Even so, this is from the StatNews article:
"But it has done so by promising a revolutionary technology safe enough to deliver repeated doses of mRNA.
The drugs it is pushing along now, by contrast, are more modest, relying on single administrations of mRNA. Beyond the four vaccines, it has one early-stage clinical trial targeting cardiac disease, launched just last month by partner AstraZeneca. The treatment involves a one-time dose and doesn’t use the tricky nanoparticle casing."
Thats why we have the Wayback Machine :)
They are telling people to boost constantly because big pharma, banksters etc do not have enough money yet.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/11/14/vaccination-industry-in-a-nutshell/
I think they are hanging on to the Covid booster idea (against all evidence) until they get their combined Covid/influenza vaccine done.
Then, that lets them start with a "clean slate" and buys them more years of making billions to jab people with substances that are ineffective at their main function of stopping a virus while causing massive amounts of side effects because they were insufficiently tested.
True, but testing will do no good. Poisons are poisons which ever way you look at it, and will never do what they say they do which is primarily train the immune system.
If we actually tested the vials properly we would find what was really in them. Typically this will be industrial waste as big pharma have to dump it somewhere, and our bodies as good as any place.
Yes, read everything that Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche has published to date.
https://voiceforscienceandsolidarity.substack.com/
I have seen this happen, including a few very severe example, but it doesn't happen to everyone and I have no way to quantify the rate at which it happens.
Thanks
Yes, simply think logically about it. The aim is to kill you, how better than to erase totally your immune system? Tough bugger though, it can't be done by one shot or even 4, but each subsequent shot does weaken it.
I'm looking for the scientific answer, not logical inference based on assumptions
then start reading geert vandenbossche.
Okay, science facts: one thing the vax does is act as little shears for your cells. As you can see I'm not a scientist. Your DNA becomes changed. You can have myocarditis. unvaxxed people are at risk from vaxxed ones.-"shedding" of their dead skin. And the list goes on.
Find established fact that cant be questioned and you know where to begin questioning.
DNA was/is a globally invested technology that did not deliver promised/expected returns.
Like so much else of the 'science', it is spun out of a black box that is linked with or identical to 'dark research' be that military or corporate (its both).
Note 'Intelligence' is now a cloak of transnational security for a global biotech agenda. Upstream to what DNA dogma was supposed to reduce life to, is the realm of bio-electromagnetic field or bio-field. The research into this is the intent to weaponise and marketise 'applications' using nano-particles (which are a natural component in bio-function) but are being designed to 'gain function' from Nature so as to 'fix it' or 'improve and upgrade it'. Graphene Flagship being but one example.
Virology was falsely conceived, unfounded but so invested in as to be too big to fail. It retreated to pathological GENETIC modelling (black-box definitions - but WHO regulates or validates the elite institutions that announce them - often by press release!
So the biological model of life is the most pathological factor involved in all of this, but it is too big to fail as a compound global investment over generations - such that everything/everyone ELSE must be sacrificed to 'save it'. - albeit as a much more rigidly defined and controlled dogma.
The model assigns artefacts to life that either don't exist or introduce distortion filters by which to work against healing - ie as if to boost 'your immune system', or 'fix your genes'.
As for shedding (anything but toxic substances) - I not only question it's veracity but question the narratives used as 'science' for transmission by germs, or their imaginary nano counterpart viruses.
It isn't just elites who are invested in a pathological worldview, but the Many, whose investment is of a personal and social identity.
So a falsely founded identity in assumed science is compelled to look within the black box of its assumptions for what isn't there - excepting as a derivative pattern - which is pervasive and increasing evident to anyone with eyes to see as exactly like a usurping, hacking virus, or rogue parasitic cancer in its operation at the level of our minds, our currency of thought and our resulting feedback of interpretation we call the world.
If you are precise you cant say 'the vax' when there are known to be various batches of various brands kept and delivered and injected under various conditions, but I feel reasonable in asserting it is a toxic shock at least - for it has to be to qualify as 'generating an immune response'. (Discounting the known switch to saline placebo in at least some conscientious medical staff).
Shock can be also emotional or dare I say it 'psychic'. The overall emotional context for this agenda was of unprecedented and deliberate application of shock treatment to the goal of coercing such and outcome - either for the result of the injections themselves and/or the institutional structure of biotechnological status of bio-insecurity, that is no longer merely inadequate but a risk factor to the 'herd' collective and so no longer holding rights as an individual under 'contagion theory' running unchecked. (quite apart from carbon guilting or thought crime regarding other securitised narratives for economic control, through the enforcing of 'environmental, social and governmental' regulatory requirements.
Many think damage control is still feasible as part of an establishment set in an old normal. So I expect they will be used for such purpose as a tool of the intent to reset human beings as bio assets for experiment or whimsy.
Genetic control/eugenics is not just for depopulation agenda.
Very good and re "As for shedding (anything but toxic substances) - I not only question it's veracity but question the narratives used as 'science' for transmission by germs, or their imaginary nano counterpart viruses." I agree.
I consider it a fear tactic, a distraction whilst the elites continue to asset strip the nations. Money and control are the primary objective.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/11/14/vaccination-industry-in-a-nutshell/
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/08/17/what-is-the-flu-a-k-a-covid-19-and-why-vaccines-are-pointless-at-best/
YES!!!! Stay away from vaccines............ALL OF THEM!!!
"The medical authorities keep lying. Vaccination has been an assault on the immune system. It actually causes a lot of illnesses. We are actually changing our genetic code through vaccination.....100 years from now we will know that the biggest crime against humanity was vaccines."
-Dr Guylaine Lanctor author of "The Medical Mafia"
"Much of what you have been led to believe about immunization simply isn't true. If I were to follow my deeper convictions, I would urge you to reject all inoculations for your child....There in convincing scientific evidence that mass inoculations can be credited with eliminating any childhood disease"
-Dr Robert Mendelsohn author of "Confessions of a Medical Heretic"
"These chronic diseases, including hay fever, asthma, cancer, and AIDS, are the result of wrong interventions upon the organism by conventional medicine.....the immune systems of the Western population, through strong chemical drugs and repeated vaccinations, have broken down.....medicine, instead of curing diseases, is actually the cause of the degeneration of the human race"
-Dr Juan Manuel Martinez Mendez writing in the Aug/Sept 2004 Townsend Letter
The Truth About Vaccinations – History and Hoax
https://thetruthaboutvaccines.com/the-truth-about-vaccinations/
Vaccine Ingredients and Vaccine Secrets
https://healthwyze.org/reports/60-vaccine-secrets
The Poisoned Needle - Eleanor McBean:
HTTPS://THEBIGVIRUSHOAX.COM/THE-POISONED-NEEDLE
VAXXED VS. UNVAXXED: A STUDY FINALLY PROVES UNVACCINATED CHILDREN ARE HEALTHIER
https://thefamilythathealstogether.com/vaxxed-vs-unvaxxed-are-unvaccinated-children-healthier-than-those-who-are-vaccinated/
10 Most SURPRISING and DANGEROUS ingredients in vaccines, and the industry’s poor explanations for why they’re used
https://www.dcclothesline.com/2022/12/08/10-most-surprising-and-dangerous-ingredients-in-vaccines-and-the-industrys-poor-explanations-for-why-theyre-used/
Dr. Andrew Moulden: All Vaccines Cause Ischemia (Impaired Blood Flow) Which Blocks Oxygen Delivery Leading to Chronic Disease
https://educate-yourself.org/cn/All-Vaccines-Cause-Ischemia-(Impaired-Blood-Flow)-Which-Blocks-Oxygen-Delivery22jul15.shtml#top
https://thevaccinereaction.org/
https://www.vaccinesandchristianity.org/
https://www.amazon.com/Dissolving-Illusions-Disease-Vaccines-Forgotten/dp/1480216895/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8
https://odysee.com/@drsuzanneh:f
Spot on
Personally I am not sure about permanent, as I am unaware if anybody has been fully analysed. Each shot will increase damage but depends on what actually is in each shot as we don't know for sure without testing each vial.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/08/17/what-is-the-flu-a-k-a-covid-19-and-why-vaccines-are-pointless-at-best/
I'm afraid I no longer trust "science," I trust you though. And reading/scanning was very enlightening thanks.
The cardiac CHEST PAIN (not deaths) case data was so bad for Scotland post dose of the under 40's Public Health Scotland COMPLETELY ERASED it !! No data now post July 2021. It has never been updated since. Unlucky for them i kept the old data before it was 1984'd. THIS is what we're up against ! +115% increse in chest pain cases IMMEDIATELY following dosing of the under 40's age range.
:(
see before and after data here - https://gettr.com/post/p21qggmf756
I sure hope there are many people like u who saved data from the start. They are going to erase all of it little by little.
see the traitorus UK parliament tonight as Andrew Bridgen laid out the case for the vax to be withdrawn etc EMPTY
https://parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/d0cc6561-6ab9-46ea-8d6d-f07ac0cf136d
Thank you very much. Traitors indeed, I am in UK myself. Worth pointing out go to about 19:04:30 near the end as otherwise everybody will be put off by 19 hours!!!
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/08/17/what-is-the-flu-a-k-a-covid-19-and-why-vaccines-are-pointless-at-best/
https://twitter.com/porridge2022/status/1602811906263322624
Excuse me but bloody hell! I checked on Maria Colette Caulfield, she looks rather different in the video to her Wikipedia page photo in 2017.
She should be electrocuted for her crimes against humanity.
'I electrocuted all Mafia' is anagram of her name, so poetic justice.
https://twitter.com/Nohj_85/status/1603456255858774017
Thank you. As regards NHS, it is f*****g useless. I was misdiagnosed in 2020. Part of my story is here.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/11/19/sodium-nitrite-e250-the-poison-in-your-food-and-how-to-remedy-it/
I would not have used such language (except to myself!) before 2020 but as the evil is so vile I have no alternative to use it sometimes now.
NO these are the biggest crimes and fraud ever perpretrated on humanity ! The entire system is now over-run with immoral evil doers. https://twitter.com/BobHart17648443/status/1521976688007335938
Only 6 members attending!
:(
Am I wrong Dr?
Suggestion: save links to archive.org so they are truly saved, in the event the original url goes offline.
"Unlucky for them i kept the old data before it was 1984'd"
Please share it
"Because of this lag, it is possible to refute the commonly cited argument that these changes were due to COVID-19 or the lockdowns, as these only occurred in 2020 (the only possible exception I can think of is that Delta emerged near the end of 2020)."
I suspect they will still make this argument and cite the case numbers
Our World in Data, Germany: https://i.imgur.com/TK4ljd2.png
They will just say these cardiovascular events are from "Long Covid" so they take months to a few years to form.
If the "vaccine" peddlers were serious about the safety & efficacy of their products, there would be double-blind RCTs all over the place in multiple countries by neutral parties. Instead we get only a few short-term RCTs, one of which Pfizer is being sued over by a whistleblower, with no proper adverse event reporting, and the authors of the studies were paid by Pfizer and/or Moderna and have investments in the companies. Conflict of interest much? And the results - which, in some cases, were outright unfathomably amazing: massive improvement with virtually 0 side effects (right...) - ended up being so definitive that the control group was hurriedly vax'd up like most of the rest of the population.
If their product was as great as they claimed it would be, there wouldn't have to be so much pressure to take it.
"You really don't want the jabs? Oh well, your loss!"
Nope. They didn't want any unjabbed controls around.
The change from Q4 2020 to Q1 2021 is an abrupt step function from one mode to another. By far the most likely explanation is a significant change/intervention within about a month of New Year's day 2021. Delta was still 6 months away. The onset of the pandemic was 9 months earlier. If covid itself was the cause with a time delay, the onset would have been gradual over perhaps 3 quarters due to the varied time from being sick with covid to onset of long-term symptoms. The variants at that time were not particularly different in their behavior from the Wuhan strain, probably because it was the vaccines themselves that sped up the evolutionary process. Can anyone think of another abrupt change around the 2020-2021 boundary? I for one am at a loss to come up with any hypothesis other than the covid vaccines.
I agree. The only possible alternative hypothesis I can think of was that the people in charge decided to switch on 5g when the vaccines were rolled out and have the vaccines act as a cover for that. I don't think that's what happened, but that is the only possible alternative hypothesis I have come across.
I hope you are not serious with 5g being a possible alternative hypothesis.
A joke ?
It's kind of a joke; it's also meant to illustrate I looked at everything that could explain this and could not find any explanation besides the vaccines.
Roger
Let me take off my TF hat first
I get the whole thing about how maaaaybe 5g turns on something within the Vax but that 5g could cause the kind of injuries associated with the Vax I wouldn't spend 5 seconds considering.
Doesn't have to effect the VAX..look up Dr Martin Pall research on emf causing oxidative stress through vgcc's and the ponder the impact of 5G (certainly at mm frequency)
5 g predated that didnt it i most locations?
Chemically change the body and you change the receptiveness to airwaves and psychological manipulation, like holding an analogue aerial improves radio signal. 5g may have role to play but there are so many airwaves it is one of many.
the tech we sort of know about is not just that 5g can be turned on, but that it can be used in various modes and intensities, that interact with mind and body functions. At the very least to interfere with functional integrity of the biofield/gel water with living systems, and in some cases to affect nanoparticulates - ie to ionic dispersal or molecular clumping. I don't know what is being sprayed in the skies - now officially - under 'weather control' or sun dimming or aerosol 'medications/vaccinations'. It's a black box. Just as the 'elitism' generates a sealed unit in which we are to operate with no user access - not unlike a rat maze in a lab.
So there's a few more far-out possible factors that might play into either the physical or the psychic realm of effects that are both in play.
I am aware that belief in a threat operates as effectively regardless of being real - especially once induced into defences given status of protecting or boosting immunity. So I lean to a world of lies going much deeper than we would think - for thinking was derived from them. But on a brighter note, the lie is only thus as a capacity to pass off as true. So uncovering the false is the freedom to now seek and find truth - not least by refining our questions from an expanding embrace of truth, lived felt and shared rather than 'modelled' for predictive control.
this is the narrative being used.
I still have not seen conclusive evidence it is not correct. Or more accurately, if it is the spike that is to blame, perhaps both infection and vaccination. Though clearly we know the spikes are NOT the same.
or it could be it is vaccination followed by infection.
I suspect if it was infection we would have seen evidence already by some key large systems.
they wont release that evidence if it is vaccination
If the spike preceded its 'virus' what is it?
It seems to me to be indirectly assayed by means of the same kinds of 'tests' as generated a test-demic. It is supposed to be produced (minus its virus body) by genetically modified human cells after injection and transfection (via nanotech hydrogels), for that is the stated purpose and function of the gene therapy-cum-vaccine.
But is that taken as fact because experts say? is it another case of cell debris being flagged as 'spike' protein - as a spiking narrative in a mutating novel?
I note the MSMedia(lockstepped as it is) & social media, pushing the memes of sudden death athletes and celebs WITHOUT assigning injections as suspects. This leads the public to 'join the dots' and set the belief as their own thinking - bases not unreasonably on distrust of the whole business of fearporn led globally orchestrated coercion. So while I do believe they are toxic, I am wary to being coopted into consenting against my will by mindless reactions.
In their terms the result they seek is a biosecurity state or a biotech revolution.
I translate this as bio-insecurity status set into technocratic controls even at the level of biological augmentation. In order to get consent I see a narrative of being irrevocably damaged to become a reset for original sin under a new Technate.
Again :- Belief something is so, can function as such, regardless truth - once invested in by reaction. Who has eyes to see is of a discernment in the heart of wholeness or integral sovereignty - that is - within life - not set over or as if apart.
That is one hypothesis.
then they will have the problem that the non vaccinated do not seem to get long covid after infection as numerous as the vaccinated do......
i have seen no data on that. The data that i have seen suggests the opposite
then those data must be false.
there is no such thing as long covid....
there is. I have cared for it. it is just not as common as some would say
so tell, what symptoms are specific and exclusive to long covid?
and which of the symptoms are objectifiable?
and why were over 50% of the long covid patients i an israeli study never infected with sarscov2 in the first place?
Well said.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/11/14/vaccination-industry-in-a-nutshell/
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/08/17/what-is-the-flu-a-k-a-covid-19-and-why-vaccines-are-pointless-at-best/
I would like to recommend Charles Eisenstein's substack for anyone interested in understanding the bigger picture. https://charleseisenstein.substack.com/p/handfuls-of-dust-and-splinters-of-16c
Agree!
Thank you again for your important and well researched articles. I certainly wish that we had an strong advocate here in Australia to counter the increasingly totalitarian approach of our federal and state governments and the TGA (our equivalent of the FDA)! I am really concerned about this development: https://www.theepochtimes.com/muzzling-medical-free-speech_4910748.html
:(
I am saddened to just learn that a dear friend died of accelerated progressive cancer after the vax, age 65y, a wonderful caring oncologist. Last year a near relative died of aggressive metastatic colon cancer after decades of remission, following the vax.
The work of The Ethical Skeptic astutely examines these data related to huge excess deaths from malignancies. https://theethicalskeptic.substack.com/
-Laura Kragie MD biomedworks.substack.com
They did find some malignancies increased, and this is another area where we need to do a detailed analysis.
I learned more than I wish I had to about cancer treatments when my mother and my best friend were both fighting long but ultimately unsuccessful battles with cancer several years ago.
One thing I remember as relevant to now is that my friend's standard treatment for AML was very dated chemotherapy, and one of the big areas of attack showing promise for leukemia treatment was immunotherapy.
This whole mRNA vaccine thing has gotten me wondering. What if our immune systems are even more vital to not getting cancer than we thought? What if our bodies are fighting off potential deadly cancers all of the time, way more than we thought?
If they can reprogram someone's immune cells (as in immunotherapy) to fight off a cancer that we know is trying to kill a person, maybe reprogramming someone's immune system to NOT fight off a cancer (because it focuses too much on worrying about a spike protein), is allowing cancers that people would have otherwise (with a normal immune system) never knew they even had instead grow to kill them?
You might be interested in the Nobel Prize for Medicine 2018.
Imagine that less than 3 years after giving a Nobel for working on how to use the immune system to fight cancer (which is a threat to everyone), scientists were lauded for hijacking that same immune system and getting it to ignore its other responsibilities to focus on stopping a virus that was no threat to most people.
The focus is always on how to commercialize it, not how to do something positive with it.
Yes... 😢
For instance the treatments for AIDS and HIV... now repurposed to treat COVID. How nice.
I don't prefer the use of 'immune system' as such but of the natural homeostasis of a living system in maintaining its core functions amidst change and challenge.
I also lean to Hamer's understanding of cancers as 'biological shocks' that have both conflict and healing phases according to the nature of the shock and the organs affected - ie fear of death goes to the lungs.
But I note research on nagalese and GcMAF, such that one is in some sense supporting the 'cancer' growth and the other turns off to allow reintegration.
As with anyone achieving real results for those with cancers (especially the 'go home and die' stage), David Noakes and Lyn Thyer were subjected to thuggery.
While not about GcMAF, the thuggery was very clearly revealed in the documentary "Cancer is a Serious Business", freely watchable.
One we bought into an immune system, we had to keep it boosted!
But our sense of self and life can be shocked, undermined, depreciate and depleted under constant strain and set into recurring patterns of resetting the trauma such as to regress to an incapacity to sustain the conditions for living.
Well they had to shut down part of your immune system to get the thing in and working in you. To get it past the guards on the wall so to speak. Pseudouredine? plus? disables your immune system. Of course there are also the consequences of lockdowns. Less Vit D, stress, weight gain, sadness... all leads to weakened immune system. Makes me so mad. I am sorry about your mama and friend. That's quite a blow for one year.
Thanks.
The refusal of the "experts" to recommend lifestyle and diet changes even pre-vaccine, when they do that for almost every other medical condition, was along with their tossing of natural immunity the obvious factors that meant I was never buying into what they were selling.
In the UK oncologist misdiagnosed me and they should have known better. I explain here.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/11/19/sodium-nitrite-e250-the-poison-in-your-food-and-how-to-remedy-it/
The cancer industry is all part of the big pharma scam, killing and harming people..
Dr.Vernon Coleman: The Jabbed Are Seriously at Risk of Developing Cancer
"The entire medical establishment should be taken out and hung for they are all traitors to their profession and to mankind."
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/drvernon-coleman-the-jabbed-are-seriously?publication_id=581065&post_id=89613831&isFreemail=true
Thank you for this thoughtful presentation of the data. When I see the graphs, I think of the massive number of individuals represented by the increases in injuries and death. I’m so sad that this has happened and so shocked that so many people have been complicit in allowing it to happen. I keep thinking that surely the end is near but there doesn’t seem to be an end.
These things just take time.
More charts for my wall. Thank you, and also on behalf of my patients. Like a high school student doing a science project, I am considering creating a montage presenting ALL available data and just putting it in the waiting area.
I think we will know in the next few days how valid all this data is!
You are an amazing and patient writer with such thorough information that a lay person can relate to and understand. I thank you Midwestern Doctor !!
Thank you! It's a fun challenge for me to see how wide of an audience I can make this material accessible to.
Well, as a "dumb housewife" with no college education, I understand 90% or so...when you delve into the math of probabilities, my eyes glaze over, but other than that, I get it. Thank you for digesting the studies, and translating for us. I cannot imagine how you find time to practice medicine, let alone have a life outside of this work.
I was waiting for someone to post the German data with translations. People here in the USA are usually too lazy to do translations.
By the way, have you or anyone else responded to the RCTs done on the mRNA shots? This is of course considered the "Gold standard"
Here are 2 meta-analyses, citing 4 total authors having done RCTs on the mRNA shots
https://idpjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40249-021-00878-5
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33691913/
- Baden et al 2020
- Polack et al 2020
- Mulligan et al 2020
- Walsh et al 2020
In the Pfizer and Moderna "gold standard" RCTs, the vaccine groups had 4 extra non-COVID deaths for every 3 less COVID deaths overall (compared to the placebo groups), i.e. 4 killed for every 3 saved, even during the deadliest Alpha wave in winter 2020-21. The separate Pfizer and Moderna trials both showed a 15-20% increase in non-COVID deaths, and specifically a 40-50% increase in cardiovascular-related deaths, with vaccine versus placebo.
RCT stands for Randomized Control/clinical Trial ?
BTW: my personal experience from having had both the 2019 winter flu shot (www.orwell.city archived articles tested it to be loaded with graphene oxide as part of the hydrogel) and first astra-zen jab shot (feb 2021--same batch number has caused worse symptoms in others) is that these c19 vaccines are bioweapons designed specifically to transform one's body into attacking itself over indefinitely via timed released and most likely 5G triggered destructive bio events. I have suffered from weakened immune system, scar/adhesions tissue attacking: my central nervous system, ligaments, muscles, skeletal system, and even some major organs; also reactivation of latent viruses in my heart, auto immune reaction causing hair loss, swollen breaststroke, swollen lymph glands, chronic fatigue.
These are not vaccines, these mRNA is a military managed program to reduce and control humanity worldwide. Watch video to learn that dod controls entire pharm industry via $45billion funding via B --A-R-D-A in this sobering presentation:
usa dod is running the entire pandemic for the purpose of getting toxic injections masked as vaccines injected which will cause the injected's immune system to attack itself, leading ultimately to a slow death for some and a sudden death for others.
Presentation by Sasha Latypova about DOD/HHS weapons programs, pharma contracts, BARDA accellerator programs, etc.INTENT TO HARM - EVIDENCE OF THE CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT MASS MURDER BY THE US DOD, HHS, PHARMA CARTEL
www.bitchute.com/video/8ftbShzrkjl9/
This presentation covers the pseudo-legal structure, organizational structure and money flow of this criminal enterprise.
Danke sehr.
You are welcome!