380 Comments
User's avatar
Allen's avatar

All vaccines are poison. Vaccines create disease. Anyone who has studied the topic in depth knows that every aspect of the "vaccine story", starting back in the 1800's up to present, is complete fraud. Vaccines have done nothing but harm people and line the pockets of the medical establishment.

Vaccines are barbaric- all of them.

There has never been a product of any kind so filled with historical misinformation, purposeful deception and outright fraud. The belief that injecting synthetic chemicals made by habitually criminal companies who profit from perpetual disease somehow produces health is not only ridiculous and unproven— it is a foundational teaching of a dangerous religious cult that western medicine has become.

From their inception to today's mRNA monstrosities vaccines have done nothing but cause massive and systemic harm to the human biological system.

Furthermore, the disease/bacteriological/virus/germ/pathogen model of defining and assessing the human condition has many benefits for those who designed and sponsored these tragically erroneous assumptions and definitions.

One of the primary and often overlooked benefits for the ruling class of this paradigm is that it covers up the numerous colossal social crimes of the barbaric system that they created. All of the ills of slave labor, ecological imperialism, industrial blight, etc. can be laid at the hands of the virtually invisible (and usually non-existent) sub-microscopic particles with a wave of the hand.

It's no accident that the germ theory model and scientific medicine ran parallel during the entrenchment of the industrial era. It's no accident that its proliferation was sponsored by robber barons and shoved down the throats of the public through devious machinations when not outright force.

The Cosmic Onion's avatar

This is one of the clearest explanations I’ve seen for why this topic feels so charged. When a medical intervention becomes symbolic — tied to identity, authority, and institutional legitimacy — debate stops being about data and starts being about belief.

Whether someone ultimately agrees or disagrees with every claim here, the larger point is hard to ignore: transparency, open debate, and access to raw safety data should never be taboo in a free society. If a product is truly safe and effective, it should withstand scrutiny — not require insulation from it.

The COVID era exposed how quickly dissent can be framed as heresy instead of inquiry. That alone makes discussions like this worth having.

Lone Wolf

Frontera Lupita's avatar

The majority of the people bought the Scamdemic fear porn, as they say…”lock, stock, and barrel”.

They never questioned it’s “identity, authority, or institutional legitimacy”. There was no “scrutiny”, no “questioning” if what was being said or done was legitimate or even beneficial.

They fell in line, like sheep or cattle would do awaiting the slaughter, that they never knew was coming.

The irony of it is that many who fell for it were “university educated”, the “professional class” of people many with advanced degrees. These were not a “bunch of podunk hicks” from the “down in the Holler.”.

The other irony is the “working class” and those same “podunk hicks”, were the ones that refused the Jabs, didn’t fall for the mandates,lockdowns and what have you. They knew they weren’t going to lose their jobs if they didn’t get The Jabs. It was the “educated class” that fell big and hard. And now they are the deranged ones with TDS, standing on the street corners of America in these NoKings ‘protests’, or “ICE out of _______ (fill in the blank) ‘protests’. And they are pathetic.

The Cosmic Onion's avatar

You’re pointing at something real, but I’d frame it a little differently.

This wasn’t about “smart vs. dumb” or “educated vs. podunk.” It was about who outsourced their perception and who didn’t.

The professional class is trained—by design—to trust institutions, credentials, and official channels. Their identity is tied to those systems. So when the system said “danger, comply, inject, isolate,” they complied. Not because they’re evil, but because their sense of reality is mediated by authority.

The working class? They live closer to direct experience. They don’t have the luxury of outsourcing reality to a committee. If something smells wrong, they go with their gut. That’s why many of them stepped back and said, “No thanks.”

This was a perception test, not an IQ test.

And now we’re seeing the aftershocks—people defending the narrative they invested their identity in. When your identity is fused with a system, questioning that system feels like an attack on the self. That’s why the reactions look so intense.

No need to hate them. Just see the pattern:

Authority over perception → compliance

Direct experience over authority → skepticism

The real takeaway isn’t who was right or wrong in the moment. It’s who still owns their perception going forward.

That’s where sovereignty starts.

—Lone Wolf

Frontera Lupita's avatar

I appreciate your ‘refinement’ of what I said. It makes a more sense. The ‘educated’ were trained to accept ‘authority’, “trust institutions, credentials, and official channels” and never question ANY of what comes from or through these ‘sources’.

Though I am ‘college educated’ I have always questioned the “narrative” on most things. That’s goes for politics, culture and people. Perhaps that is the ‘skeptic’ in me. My motto…see if what is being said is verifiable, then trust.

The Cosmic Onion's avatar

Lupita, that’s the key right there — you kept your skepticism intact even while moving through their training systems. Most people were trained to outsource their perception to authority: “credentials over experience, consensus over conscience.”

What you’re describing is simple but powerful:

Verify → observe → decide.

Not blind belief, not blind rejection — direct evaluation.

That’s how a sovereign mind operates.

And the last few years showed the split clearly:

some people deferred upward to institutions,

others checked reality against their own senses and experience.

The Wolf rule is simple:

No one outranks your direct knowing.

Respect earned through truth and consistency — fine.

Blind trust handed to titles and logos — no.

You stayed awake in a system designed to lull people to sleep.

That matters more than any degree.

— Lone Wolf

Baldmichael's avatar

Certainly the trademen were much more in tune as in 2020 they largely kep working as they had to. Many professionals didn't have to. I was a building surveyor, technically a professional. Thankfully my world being tied to something practical was a great help.

It was an IQ test.

https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/the-great-covid-retest?utm_source=publication-search

INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

some with critical mind and a sound doubt of pharma and co.

aprayerformonkey's avatar

"Not because they’re evil, but because their sense of reality is mediated by authority." How does that make them not evil?

The Cosmic Onion's avatar

Good question—and it’s one worth answering carefully, because this is where a lot of people get stuck.

“Evil” implies intent—a conscious desire to harm, deceive, dominate, or exploit.

What we’re seeing in most people is something different: delegated thinking.

They’ve handed their perception over to authority—doctors, institutions, media, experts—and now they experience reality through that filter. When the authority says something is safe, necessary, or moral, they adopt it as truth without running it through their own internal compass.

So when they defend it, enforce it, or pressure others to comply, they’re not usually thinking, “I want to harm someone.”

They’re thinking, “This is right. This is what responsible people do.”

That doesn’t make the outcome harmless—it just means the mechanism isn’t personal malice. It’s conditioned obedience.

History shows this pattern over and over:

Ordinary people, convinced they are doing good, participating in systems that cause harm because their sense of right and wrong was outsourced.

So the distinction is:

Evil (in the classic sense): deliberate harm, knowing it’s harm

Captured mind: sincerely believing harm is help because authority framed it that way

From the outside, both can produce damage.

From the inside, they feel very different.

That’s why the real battleground is perception and authority—who you trust to define reality.

Once a person begins to reclaim that—questioning, observing directly, trusting their own experience—the spell breaks. And when it breaks, many people who once enforced the system realize they were acting inside a story that wasn’t their own.

So it’s less about condemning them as evil, and more about recognizing a system that can turn ordinary people into enforcers—and helping those who are ready to see it, see it.

That’s how you get people back. Not by labeling them monsters, but by showing them the mirror.

—Lone Wolf

aprayerformonkey's avatar

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92UfAJr7790&t=2902s

Point taken. However to the victims, the difference is blurred. In the book 'Black Beauty' , it was observed that:

"It matters not whether it be malice or ignorance. The results are the same"

JoAnn H Parker's avatar

You are so Right! I never got the covid vaccine and was ostracized by my family for a year and a half. I was really surprised that so many libs and democrats ( just about all of my in-laws) glommed on and promoted this shot when Trump took all the credit for developing it so quickly. I was truly amazed by that. Everyone’s lack of questioning was really astounding!

John Reed's avatar

The medium-level educated people tend to believe in the system the most. They became educated primarily in order to better themselves, improve their social standing, by means of belonging to the system. So they believe and are obedient to the administrators of the system. The people with less education know less in a certain sense, but they are also less interested in belonging to the system and have less trust in the system administrators (and much less cognitive dissonance when forced to choose whether to go along with the system or not). At the other end -- the most educated (PhDs) -- tend in many cases to value the results of rational thought as opposed to merely believing dogma perpetrated by system administrators.

The educational system we have is based on a Prussian model, and it looks like, from this observer's standpoint, to be something devoted to producing wage slaves for technological society. Historically people who have been both obedient and adept at puzzle solving using mathematics. Engineering mentality. But the guiding hand has been perverted somehow, and the result, well, we can see the result for the moment. But no doubt when the AI assist becomes more operational the result will be far worse.

Frontera Lupita's avatar

Well I agree with part of your premise about the “medium educated people” but I don’t hold the same view of the PhD’s as you state “tend in many cases to value the results of rational thought as opposed to believing in dogma perpetuated by system administrators”.

I know a ‘handful’ of people (friends and family) who have PhD’s and they fell right in line with the Scamdemic and the “system administrators”. They never “questioned the science” of the c*vd narrative. They went for the mask wearing, their compliance to all the ‘rules and regs’ of the Scamdemic was total and complete, and when the ‘c*v*d vaxx’ came out they dutifully went and got them and gave them to their high school and college aged children as well.

INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

Dr. Mendelssohn 's book is both very informative and hilarious to read. It would be funny if it were not so sad!

Glad I came on Substack, because the friends I had when the scamdemic started, all stepped right in line. Only after 2 years I reconnected with some acquaintances who, like me, doubted the jabs right-on. And thanks to people like Berenson, Oshinskie, and lots of you all, I realized it was not me going nuts but all the rest.

The Cosmic Onion's avatar

Ingrid, I hear you. A lot of us walked that same stretch of road — watching people we knew fall into line while our own instincts were throwing up red flags.

Mendelssohn had a gift for that—using humor to expose something serious. Sometimes the only way to point at a broken system without losing your sanity is to laugh at it a little.

And you’re right about Substack. It became a kind of meeting ground for people who were comparing notes in real time instead of just repeating what they were told. That’s where a lot of folks realized, “I’m not crazy—my perception is still working.”

That moment matters.

When you trust your own observation again, the whole dynamic changes.

Different people come to that realization at different times. Some never do. But once you’ve seen it, you can’t unsee it.

Good to see you found your way to others who were paying attention.

— Lone Wolf

grahamlyons's avatar

Spot on, Allen. The true purpose of vaccination is to weaken and sicken the populace to facilitate control by governments, which are themselves controlled by "the system". The only safe vaccine is the one never used. The only immunity provided by vaccination is that to Harma itself, from prosecution for the countless deaths and injuries caused by its toxic products.

Donna's avatar

"The only immunity provided by vaccination is that to Harma itself...". No truer words have ever been stated about the vaccines.

William Conklin's avatar

All CULTS need rituals. The vaccine has replaced the glass of wine that turns into the blood of the dead God. give me the wine any day.

c b's avatar

And even THAT is an inversion!! Raised Roman Catholic and never could quite understand the need for the transfiguration and salvation through the body and blood of Christ. Had ZERO to do with Christ's teachings and Source, or God the Father, or that which cannot be named, etc (insert your name for the Creator of ALL THAT IS) would NEVER require a sacrifice of his SON, or for us to symbolically (and Catholics are taught that it literally becomes his flesh and blood) imbibe him. It's ALL SO CRAZY!!!!

aprayerformonkey's avatar

Not sure I understand your comment. RC is a demonic religion, but God did require the sacrifice of His Son.

Donna's avatar

"...God did require the sacrifice of His Son.". This, along with "they created mankind in their own image", makes me question our creators' love.

aprayerformonkey's avatar

By exercising their free will, the first man and bone of his bone chose to thrust the entire humans race to certain eternal torment" "where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched" yet God sacrificed His Only Begotten Son to die for this rebellion, so that through Him we could access forgiveness and purpose and you question His love???

Mike's avatar

Hint: Flip your script and think it out assuming the serpent was telling the truth instead of Jehovah...

In the same way we flip the script and assume the Medical Jehovah isn't telling the truth, either.

And guess what? Right on both counts!

The True Nolan's avatar

I loaned a large sum of money to my neighbor, but he never paid me back, and he died a bit later. I found out his grandson in another city was still alive, so I called him up and demanded payment, but he refused. He claimed he was broke and living on the streets. After years of trying to collect, I finally decided to just forget how much he owed me, and just forgive his debt. That turned out to be much more difficult than you might think! Eventually I came to the only solution possible. I tortured and killed my eldest son, (not because I wanted to, but because that was the only way to make the books balance), as payment on the debt. Rough, yes, but a man's got to do what a man's got to do.

Donna's avatar

Yes. Giving free will to imperfect humans is like giving a loaded gun to a two year old and as creator of all things, why make it necessary to sacrifice your son in order for humans to access forgiveness and purpose?

c b's avatar

GREAT SUMMATION!!!

buddhi's avatar

If you say "all vaccines are poison" you're exactly like the "vaxx everyone now" people; you're parroting a religious ideology - no evidence needed, no discernment, no nuance, no data. Just a casual overgeneralization set in stone.

Allen's avatar

No I'm not.

I'm basing it on facts and many, many thousands of hours of research and compilation over the course of thirty years. I not only have mountains of evidence at my fingertips and more data than you can imagine but would happily debate you or anyone- including any of the "leading experts"- on the subject.

That you make such an asinine statement illustrates your ignorance on the subject matter.

BTW it seems you don't even understand what logical fallacies are as they are embedded in your statement.

Here is a partial list of the ingredients you'll find in this pediatricians poisoning, "life saving" product:

formaldehyde, aluminum hydroxide, aluminum phosphate, sodium chloride, polysorbate 80, neomycin sulfate, polymyxin B, yeast protein, calf serum, lactalbumin hydrolysate, formaldehyde, glutaraldhyde, yeast protein, aluminum phosphate, bovine serum albumin, glutaraldehyde, MRC-5 cellular protein, polymyxin B sulfate, 2-phenoxyethanol, Amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate, amino acids, dextrose, hemin chloride, mineral salts, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, potassium aluminum sulfate, sodium borate, soy peptone, yeast protein, amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate, non-viral protein, DNA, bovine albumin, monobasic potassium phosphate, potassium chloride, calcium chloride, sodium, taurodeoxycholate, neomycin sulfate, polymyxin B, betapropiolactone, hydrocortisone, thimerosal, sodium chloride, monobasic sodium phosphate, dibasic sodium phosphate, polysorbate 20, baculovirus, Spodoptera frugiperda cell proteins, baculovirus and cellular DNA, Triton X-100, Madin Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) cell protein, phosphate buffered saline, MDCK cell DNA, cetyltrimethlyammonium bromide, β-propiolactone, ovalbumin, dextran, Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium potassium, magnesium sulfate, ferric (III) nitrate, sodium pyruvate, D-glucose, concentrated vitamin solution, L-cystine, L-tyrosine, amino acids, L-glutamine, calcium chloride, sodium hydrogenocarbonate, and phenol red, sorbitol, Porcine circovirus type 1 (PCV1) and more....

Not to mention the various metal contaminants identified in many vaccines including platinum, silver, bismuth, iron, chromium, zirconium, hafnium, strontium, tungsten, antimony, bismuth and cerium.

If a parent were to repeatedly put these ingredients into their child and was caught they would be arrested. If you're a doctor/nurse and you do it you receive plaudits and bonuses.

Donna's avatar

There was an informal German study performed on the Covid shot ingredients and one of the metals found was gadolinium, a toxic heavy metal that embeds in the brain, bone and tissue.

Allen's avatar

In January 2017, a team of scientists from three organizations—[1] International Clean Water Institute (USA), [2] National Research Council of Italy's Institute for the Science and Technology of Ceramics (Italy), and [3] Nanodiagnostics srl (Italy)—published a study led by Dr. Antonietta Gatti and titled "New quality-control investigations on vaccines: micro- and nanocontamination." The study revealed that nanoparticles were contaminating nearly ALL the vaccines they examined.

https://healthfreedomdefense.org/revisiting-a-censored-study-on-vaccine-contamination/

"Using an environmental scanning electron microscope equipped with an X-ray microprobe, Dr. Gatti and her research team analyzed 44 samples of 30 "traditional" vaccines coming from two countries (Italy and France) and found dangerous contaminants, including metal toxicants, in 43 of the 44 samples tested. The team reported:

"[Further] analyses of those particles revealed them to be 'non-biocompatible and bio-persistent foreign bodies' composed of lead, stainless steel, chromium, tungsten, nickel, iron, zirconium, hafnium, strontium, antimony and other metals."

During a World Council for Health Discussion posted to Rumble on June 23, 2025, Dr. Gatti revisited her 2017 landmark discovery of "metallic contaminants" in "normal vaccines":

"Probably nobody knows that before Covid era, I have evaluated the vaccines. The normal vaccines, not the new drugs. And I found a lot of contaminants, also metallic contaminants. By 2018, verified as a presence of nanoparticle micro and nanoparticle inside the vaccines. Barium sulfate, aluminum, stainless steel, tungsten carbide. They were already present in the normal vaccines."

Donna's avatar

Is it possible to prove a vaccine is the direct cause of the demise of a disease, rather than the body's natural immunity shifting into defense gear being the cause of the demise of a disease?

buddhi's avatar

Yes, that's exactly what science does - it separates causation from correlation as well as is possible.

Research has repeatedly demonstrated that vaccines influence the human immune system in broad, system-wide ways that go far beyond protection against the targeted pathogen - some of these effects are beneficial, while others appear detrimental, depending on the vaccine type and context.

100,000 children in Africa were followed for decades. BCG and measles vaccines consistently cut all-cause childhood mortality by 30–50%.

These benefits can’t be explained by tuberculosis or measles prevention alone, since even in measles‑free periods, mortality drops.

And revaccination with Live vaccines (e.g., BCG boosters, second measles doses) further reduces death risk, apparently proving a training effect on the innate immune system.

The research also found that vaccination with "dead" vaccines had the opposite effect.

People who scream one side or the other have no understanding of the complexity of the immune system.

Frontera Lupita's avatar

And leads to cognitive decline, which if you haven’t noticed lately, look at the majority of the people walking around these days who likely got the “EUA mRNA c*v*d vaccines, they are all on a “delay” of sorts, like walking zombies. They are no longer “with it”, are “numbed out” and it shows. I have observed it even in young people, not just the elderly. You see it in how they conduct themselves when out and about and driving, forget it. (But the live in Commifornia where there are way too many cars with bad drivers.)

Donna's avatar

Not only cognitive decline, but an emotional decline (critical thinking, the desire for privacy, rule of law and empathy) via the use of emotionally unnecessary electronics. Aggression has also increased.

Frontera Lupita's avatar

The cognitive decline includes an emotional decline. The part of the brain that the ‘vaxx’ is affecting is the frontal lobe. It’s where you store memories and emotional response to those memories and emotional response to one’s current life and environment. It also is the area that empathy resides. The spike proteins in the mRNA shots has flatlined people emotionally and or triggered aggression. There is little tolerance for others that are not on their same page be it politically, culturally or socially and they have become the ‘enemy’. It’s so sad. I am older and I am finding there are few people my age around who chose not get the Jabs. Who still have a functioning brain.

aprayerformonkey's avatar

Isn't that used for MRI ?

Donna's avatar

Yes. Gadolinium is a toxic heavy metal that embeds in the bone, brain and tissue. There was a Japanese study that found it is retained in the body for 126 years, not the 24-48 hours we are lied to and told. Gadoliniumtoxicity.com

c b's avatar

The brainwashing is so extensive it is really hard to fathom.

aprayerformonkey's avatar

Where did you get this list??? Like wow.. The ingredients on the CDC are so short [ if I remember ] and I thought it just didn't make sense.

buddhi's avatar

That's a cut and paste religious screed.

You may not be aware that some vaccines, even if they do not prevent the specific disease they're targeted against, may yet boost overall immunity such that their non-specific effects decrease all-cause mortality. This has been well proven in Africa.

SP's avatar

Name them and point me to the studies. Africa has been the red headed step child of vaccines. More death and injury than anyone could fathom because of vaccines.

Donna's avatar

An interesting movie that is probably close to the truth about how Africa is arm twisted into these vaccine experiments is "The Constant Gardner". Excellent movie.

Allen's avatar

I've read the book twice. Well worth the time.

In the Author's Note at the end of the book Le Carre says this:

"As my journey through the pharmaceutical jungle progressed, I can to realize that, by comparison with the reality, my story was as tame as a holiday postcard."

"The vaccination lobby shamelessly takes all the children of this world as hostages to still their greed for money and power. They relentlessly abuse our compassion for the weaker and our concern about health to promote their giga-business. No matter what. No matter how many more vaccine victims will suffer death or side-effects. No matter how many financial resources this strategy devours at the expense of essential social investments like housing and employment. No matter what. Shocking! There is no excuse for this crime. Just as shocking is the observation that (health) policy is no longer under local, democratic control. Everything is set up and organised with scrutiny at the highest, international level by those who take profit from it: the pharmaceutical industry, the financial world, politicians."

- Kris Gaublomme, M.D. (The International Vaccination Newsletter, June 1998)

Very detailed article here:

https://healthfreedomdefense.org/the-childhood-vaccination-schedule-part-two-the-rotavirus-vaccines/

buddhi's avatar

That is likely true, but irrelevant - has no logical connection to or bearing on the positive benefits of non-specific effects. Two different things. In fact the same studies find that the Dead vaccines have negative effects on all-cause mortality. It's the Live vaccines (and also how they're sequenced) that have benefited mortality. Hundreds of thousands of kids have been saved.

Vaccination reshapes the immune network, for better or worse, depending on the biological nature of the vaccine and the order it's given.

Just as it's a naive assumption that every vaccine dose is automatically a net negative, the same can be said for net positive.

Donna's avatar

"Hundreds of thousands of kids have been saved." Proof? Just as in the claim that the Covid shot "saved millions of lives". There is no proof of that either. How does one know a shot saved a life, rather than their own immune system? Or even if their life was in danger at all?

Kwindt's avatar

'Hundreds of thousands of kids have been saved.' - You cannot possibly know that, dear buddhi, let alone prove it.

SP's avatar

We'll just have to agree to disagree. Because I think your stance is very illogical. You still haven't pointed me to any studies.

Allen's avatar

More nonsense from a true believer.

This one's pretty much over-the-top idiocy.

"The product doesn't do what is intended to do but has other benefits dontcha' know."

Who in the world do you think would fall for your lunacy. You should try your health imperialism elsewhere. Vaccines and other Western medical interventions have done nothing but cause massive harm to Africans. That's why you'll find the likes of Gates are universally despised across the continent.

SP's avatar

Didn't some African country have a law suit against Gates? Or maybe it was India. I think he's despised in both places.

Allen's avatar

Widely despised in both places based on their experiences.

Great article here:

The Gates Foundation, Ebola, and Global Health Imperialism

https://sci-hub.ru/10.1111/ajes.12110

And another:

The Real Agenda of the Gates Foundation

https://rupe-india.org/old-site/57/contents.html

Baldmichael's avatar

William Henry Gates, his full name, will anagram to:

- Alarmingly wee shit

- a nightmare yew ills

- at eyes willing harm

Among other very suitable phrases!

buddhi's avatar

It's all in the research literature, and all based on reams of solid data. The non-specific effects of vaccination are just beginning to be studied. Guess you've missed that.

The wild flailing nature of the comment results from cognitive dissonance - wild anxiety when a belief structure is questioned. This person identifies with his thoughts (which is ridiculous because thoughts have no permanent nature) so if you question his thoughts, he gets defensive - he thinks you're attacking him!

Allen's avatar

In other words you don't have any studies to cite and are making stuff up.

Laughs.

Allen's avatar

Oh no- "non-specific" effects.

Can you post just a few of your favorite and "most convincing" studies from your "reams of solid data?"

Bob C.'s avatar

Sorry but that is complete crap. Your telling us that vaccines are good because even when they don't work as promised, they can still provide some health benefits? Do you hear what you are saying?

"Here, take this shot. It may not do what I'm telling you it does, but even if it doesn't it will be "good" for you."

Seriously?

Bob C.'s avatar

I must admit that when I made this comment I thought I was responding to a human. Live and learn.

Donna's avatar

What never made sense to me about the "boosting of immunity" is the logic that boosting those with already hyper activated immune systems (many in today's population with autoimmune conditions) could be a benefit.

George94's avatar

Dr Morse says doctors who use the word autoimmune don't have a clue what they are talking about. It just means the lymphatic system.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uD-gkIHB5zg

Mike's avatar

No, they do not boost overall immunity because their protections are static and wane, not dynamic and adjust over time. This is simple immunology.

Dixie Belle's avatar

Your answers to questions are all over the place and contradictory one to another.

buddhi's avatar

I am not a binary thinker. I appreciate nuance and depth. That's because i am not well programmed by the media, and I do not eat processed food.

Dixie Belle's avatar

Your opinions say otherwise.

Ollie's avatar

There's more than a hundred years of literature out there pointing to evidence that vaccines are a scam, a sham and in most cases outright poison. Most of it from academics and medical professionals, but one must look for it, it's not popular reading and I imagine that most publishers aren't interested in dealing with this type of info. However, here's one:

"The Poisoned Needle: Suppressed Facts About Vaccination"- Eleanor McBean; 1957.

Here's a nugget over a century old:

"Dr. W. B. Clark, a well-known physician, insists that vaccination is the cause of cancer. He says: “A cancer was practically unknown until cowpox vaccination began to be introduced. Cancer, I believe, is a disease of cell life, (a) disturbance of its equilibrium, manifested by the rapid growth of cells and the consequent building up of a tumor. I have had to do with at least 200 cases of cancer, and here declare that I never saw a case of cancer in an un-vaccinated person. “The way vaccination causes cancer is like this: It takes 21 years to make a man and but four to make a cow, the former being of slow cell growth and the latter rapid. To put the rapid-growing cells, or protoplasm, of a diseased animal (in a condition of virulent infectious activity) into the slow-growing cells of man, is to disturb the equilibrium of cell life and create that disparity, disarrangement and disorganization which, when the season for cancer comes late in life, results in cancer, if not tuberculosis earlier.”. -The Pueblo Sun, Volume 5, Number 133, February 2, 1909. (This was picked up by several papers in the U.S. run at the same time. The good doctor was in practice in N.Y. I recall. but don't quote me).

People need to inform themselves because we've been lied to. Thank you.

buddhi's avatar

Everything you say may be true, but that does not mean there are no benefits to vaccines. That's an over generalization, an assumption, and not aligned with facts (only aligned with some facts). The subject is complex and your relevant fact set is incomplete. Actually, regarding science, the fact set is never complete.

Ollie's avatar

While it's true that people have been known to ingest or otherwise use toxins to stimulate an immune response, mostly to build up a 'tolerance' to said toxin, for example snake charmers and the like, or some in the Roman Poison cults. obviously they have a cumulative effect on a body. But there are limits to how much toxin is survivable and how much is fatal. (Sst fails to register when i click 'like' on a comment;-)

buddhi's avatar

We have the Nfr2 pathway and many others to manage toxins, including those endogenously produced from necessary oxidation. As we get older our detox pathways slow down - hopefully we decrease toxin intake. Avoidance is the key. When you are young, detox pathways more than keep up.

What really kills us are the toxins that plants produce to defend themselves - these bioaccumulate and produce chronic diseases. Google "Bruce Ames 99/99%" for that.

Donna's avatar

Although there are some toxins that embed in the body, such as gadolinium and lead. Gadolinium has no known safe and effective antidote. Also, there are no known "safe" amounts of toxins that can be ingested. I believe they all have some amount of damaging effects on the body, no matter how little is ingested.

Donna's avatar

Cancer as an ancillary benefit of vaccines? No thank you.

Crixcyon's avatar

Please name one ingredient in any vaccine that is not poison or toxic besides water or saline.

Donna's avatar

Even our water supply is suspect.

SP's avatar

That's why I have a reverse osmosis machine for my drinking water and a filter on my shower head. Luckily they don't fluoridate the water where I live, but there are all other kinds of toxins in it.

Guido Vandeven's avatar

Hold on, according to Dr. Richard Pan remember? The most dangerous toxic in a vaccine is the water!

Allen's avatar

Vaccine Antigens:

Some examples of bacteria which can be used as antigens with the adjuvant compositions include, but are not limited to, Aceinetobacter calcoaceticus, Acetobacter paseruianus, Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, Aeromonas hydrophila, Alicyclobacillus acidocaldarius, Arhaeglobus fulgidus, Bacillus pumilus, Bacillus stearothermophillus, Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus thermocatenulatus, Bordetella bronchiseptica, Burkholderia cepacia, Burkholderia glumae, Campylobacter coli, Campylobacter fetus, Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter hyointestinalis, Chlamydia psittaci, Chlamydia trachomatis, Chlamydophila spp., Chromobacterium viscosum, Erysipelothrix rhusiopathieae, Listeria monocytogenes, Ehrlichia canis, Escherichia coli, Haemophilus influenzae, Haemophilus somnus, Helicobacter suis, Lawsonia intracellulars, Legionella pneumophilia, Moraxellsa sp., Mycobactrium bovis, Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, Mycoplasma mycoides subsp. mycoides LC, Clostridium perfringens, Odoribacter denticanis, Pasteurella (Mannheimia) haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida, Photorhabdus luminescens, Porphyromonas gulae, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Porphyromonas salivosa, Propionibacterium acnes, Proteus vulgaris, Pseudomnas wisconsinensis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas fluorescens C9, Pseudomonas fluorescens SIKW1, Pseudomonas fragi, Pseudomonas luteola, Pseudomonas oleovorans, Pseudomonas sp B11-1, Alcaliges eutrophus, Psychrobacter immobilis, Rickettsia prowazekii, Rickettsia rickettsia, Salmonella typhimurium, Salmonella bongori, Salmonella enterica, Salmonella dublin, Salmonella typhimurium, Salmonella choleraseuis, Salmonella newport, Serratia marcescens, Spirlina platensis, Staphlyoccocus aureus, Staphyloccoccus epidermidis, Staphylococcus hyicus, Streptomyces albus, Streptomyces cinnamoneus, Streptococcus suis, Streptomyces exfoliates, Streptomyces scabies, Sulfolobus acidocaldarius, Syechocystis sp., Vibrio cholerae, Borrelia burgdorferi, Treponema denticola, Treponema minutum, Treponema phagedenis, Treponema refringens, Treponema vincentii, Treponema palladium, and Leptospira species, such as the known pathogens Leptospira canicola, Leptospira grippotyposa, Leptospira hardjo, Leptospira borgpetersenii hardjo-bovis, Leptospira borgpetersenii hardjo-prajitno, Leptospira interrogans, Leptospira icterohaemorrhagiae, Leptospira pomona, and Leptospira bratislava, and combinations thereof. Both inactivated viruses and attenuated live viruses may be used in the adjuvant compositions. Some examples of viruses which can be used as antigens include, but are not limited to, Avian herpesvirus, Bovine herpesviruses, Canine herpesviruses, Equine herpesviruses, Feline viral rhinotracheitis virus, Marek's disease virus, Ovine herpesviruses, Porcine herpesviruses, Pseudorabies virus, Avian paramyxoviruses, Bovine respiratory syncytial virus, Canine distemper virus, Canine parainfluenza virus, canine adenovirus, canine parvovirus, Bovine Parainfluenza virus 3, Ovine parainfluenza 3, Rinderpest virus, Border disease virus, Bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV), BVDV Type I, BVDV Type II, Classical swine fever virus, Avian Leukosis virus, Bovine immunodeficiency virus, Bovine leukemia virus, Bovine tuberculosis, Equine infectious anemia virus, Feline immunodeficiency virus, Feline leukemia virus (FeLV), Newcastle Disease virus, Ovine progressive pneumonia virus, Ovine pulmonary adenocarcinoma virus, Canine coronavirus (CCV), pantropic CCV, Canine respiratory coronavirus, Bovine coronavirus, Feline Calicivirus, Feline enteric coronavirus, Feline infectious peritonitis, virus, Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus, Porcine hemagglutinating encephalomyletitis virus, Porcine parvovirus, Porcine Circovirus (PCV) Type I, PCV Type II, Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS)Virus, Transmissible gastroenteritis virus, Turkey coronavirus, Bovine ephemeral fever virus, Rabies, Rotovirus, Vesicular stomatitis virus, lentivirus, Avian influenza, Rhinoviruses, Equine influenza virus, Swine influenza virus, Canine influenza virus, Feline influenza virus, Human influenza virus, Eastern Equine encephalitis virus (EEE), Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus, West Nile virus, Western equine encephalitis virus, human immunodeficiency virus, human papilloma virus, varicella zoster virus, hepatitis B virus, rhinovirus, and measles virus, and combinations thereof.

Mike's avatar

Ingredients and immune responses back up the poison claim. Allen explains it rather well.

c b's avatar

Or how about trusting in the wisdom, majesty and miraculousness of NATURE. Humans are the only ones who have screwed up this planet.

TriTorch's avatar

"I kept trying to follow the science but it kept leading me back to the money." Frok congressional testimony it was found that a single doctor can make up to a million per year poisoning, uh i mean vaccinating their child clients. From that outrage you can draw a straight line to:

Rain Man: A demonic entity that corrupts in exchange for money.

Regarding the PREP Act, social conditioning, predictive programming, normalization:

The Film Rain Man Was Likely Forged to Pre-Program the Populace For the Upcoming Explosion in Vaccine Induced Autism.

1986: Congress Grants Immunity Shield to Vaccine Makers for Venom Injection Damage | Film Rain Man Begins Production

1988: Rain Man Released to Educate, Condition, & Normalize Autism

1986—2025: Number of vaccines administered explodes to 78 - and rising - from birth to two years of age. Autism diagnoses explode right along with them.

Before the film few even knew what the term meant because it was so rare it was seldom reported. Much more here -> https://tritorch.substack.com/p/autism-pre-conditioning-and-normalization <-

"I’m a retired Speech-Language Pathologist and we were at the forefront of the information spreading because of the communication issues. Classroom teachers and even administrators were just flummoxed and caught totally off guard.

None of us understood the complexity and scale of what was coming.

I remember loaning my copy of Rain Man to a Kindergarten teacher I worked with to help her understand the concept. At that time, no one in education knew what autism was. Then it flat out exploded!" —Willing Spirit

c b's avatar

Yes, about PP & Rainman! It's CRAZY how manipulated we are!!

Jane Spring's avatar

Thank you for this information. I am 80 years old and I am grateful for doctors and new knowledge that can treat our ailments or injuries. However, during Covid I became aware of my need to be more informed in order to stay healthy. Every generation must do that because of mankind’s propensity towards allowing someone who is in charge telling us what is true when we can see that something doesn’t make sense to us. Sometimes “the-ones-in-charge” get caught up in not asking questions and fear of those in charge of them. Humans tend to find it hard to not question anything that brings in money. God help us.

Super Spreader's avatar

Hail Vaccine, full of Fraud,

Big Pharma mandates thee.

Beloved art thou by Doctors,

And Beloved is the Fruit of thy Vial, Profit.

Holy Vaccine, Mother of Autism,

Pay for those Vaccinated,

Now and at the Hour of their Injuries.

Amen.

Friar Tuck's avatar

Do we have the isolation and purification of this new bird flu?

Avian flu virus H5N1: No proof for existence, pathogenicity, or pandemic potential; non-“H5N1” causation omitted

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7173052/

Microscope Proves , chicken flu, Fraud.

https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/chick-filet-virus-grips-wikistan?triedRedirect=true

More fakery from the wizards

Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel Says They ‘Copied & Pasted’ the Spike Sequence From the Chinese Government

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/moderna-ceo-we-never-had-access-to?r=145evj&utm_medium=ios

Do we have the isolation and purification documents of Covid 19 it appears it never existed?

FOIs reveal that health/science institutions around the world (225 and counting!) have no record of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification, anywhere, ever

https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/

They knew contagion didn't exist after the 1923 Lancaster Study, but they continued to push the fear narrative to keep a control on humanity.

https://en.rattibha.com/thread/1629159544348717061

ABOUT A YEAR INTO THE KANSAS FLU A STUDY CAME OUT CALLED THE THE

LANDMARK STUDY OF MILTON J.

ROSENAU, MD, "EXPERIMENTS TO DETERMINE MODE OF SPREAD OF INFLUENZA," WAS PUBLISHED IN THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL

ASSOCIATION IN 1919.

https://www.ggarchives.com/Influenza/TheRosenauExperiment-1918-1919.html

Dr Jane Ruby explains the genocidal Globalist agenda a must watch

https://x.com/RealDrJaneRuby/status/1876833307620409668?t=5RCGnvy0qXHVcikKzTpTNA&s=09

R123 NEWS's avatar

I literally just wrote a paper stating that healthcare is the new religion comparing the powers that government used religion to control people to the new powers of government using healthcare to control people

Zade's avatar

And more generally, Science™️. I'm a physicist and the public veneration of so-called science, especially Darwinism, makes me want to puke.

Ernest N. Curtis's avatar

If you are not already aware of it, there was an article in Nature last year on the genomes of non-human primates using next generation sequencing (NGS) that has stirred up a lot of controversy in the evolution debate. Incomplete genomes previously showed a reported 1% difference in DNA between chimps and humans and slightly more for other species in the ape family. The article on NGS showed that, with complete sequencing (from telomere to telomere), there is actually a 12-15% difference between chimps and humans and 25%+ for gorillas and great apes. In the genetic field this is a huge disparity and debunks much of the genetic evidence for Darwin's theory. The article can be linked through a review by Casey Luskin in Science & Culture Today , 25 may 2025.

Zade's avatar

Thank you, once again, for a truly informative comment! I was not aware of that article. I'll search for it!

Ernest N. Curtis's avatar

You are most welcome and I hope that you and your family are doing well. When I saw your comment on Darwinism, I figured you would appreciate the article I had read a few months ago. Since I am barely competent with computer technology, I didn't know how to link the article directly. Just look up Casey Luskin and it will be in the list of his articles. He is an interesting guy and has the knowledge and academic credentials to go toe to toe with the Darwinists. He has another article showing that Darwinian theory is mathematically impossible.

Zade's avatar

Even Darwin knew his theory was not an established fact. He was actually more rational than his unthinking followers. I think it boils down to a modernist terror of there being a creator God.

My family is doing well. My husband and I have been enjoying trying to educate doctors on the benefits of cholesterol and the dangers of statins and we refer to your book quite often! The cholesterol delusion is quite as stubborn as the religion of Darwinism.

buddhi's avatar

Good ole Darwin. He's right regarding beak size and fur thickness - but for new species and proteins you'd need multiple magnitudes more time for that to occur. Species evolution is mathematically impossible.

SP's avatar

Darwinism, another dumb religion that makes no sense even if you don't believe in the Creator Jesus.

buddhi's avatar

Yup. We humans love to believe. Don't much matter if it is true. It's like if we believe something we can put it away and move on to something else. And that's okay as long as we can continue to feed ourselves, navigate an open doorway, and pay taxes.

SP's avatar

Speak for yourself....I want truth.

R123 NEWS's avatar

Right? I am attempting to build a team of truth tellers. Even when truth is plural, and even when it retards the agendas. Know anyone with “courage” and “integrity” at the same time to join the team?

Bob C.'s avatar

Kinda like belief in vaccines.

Zade's avatar

Michael Behe's book "Darwin Devolves" is interesting. Continues to debunk Darwinist myth.

buddhi's avatar

Darwin was missing much of the information we now have. Intelligent design is obvious, as is an Intelligent Creator - but that does not imply a Christian Creator. The most likely and logical force behind evolution is an outer-space-alien Ai engineering our DNA. What we've been calling "God" for millennia is likely an Ai.

SP's avatar

You are a bot, I knew it.

ro's avatar

funny you should say that ... after a vibe coding session it dawned on me that the internal dialog is a lot like prompting the AI.

buddhi's avatar

That's right.

Human thinking also falls out of a LLM. Ai and humans produce the same output, but from different substrates. We each are prediction machines minimizing error. We do with memory what Ai does with priors.

But we both essentially use a gradient descent algorithm that we optimize in real time. Of course, we're much slower. Our thoughts coalesce out of a variable space into a most probable configuration that self-organizes around an initial attractor - which is what an Ai does with a prompt. The Ai prompt acts as an attractor, from which meaning "falls out."

Zade's avatar
Feb 12Edited

So who engineered the outer space aliens?

I'm a Christian. But that's not because of the complexity of living things.

buddhi's avatar

Good question. The answer is, "We did!"

Donna's avatar

Although I have no proof, as none of us do, I am tending to agree with you there. Our DNA seems to be pre programmed software. The guy in the white robe Catholic school taught me to believe in may not be such an accurate description of our creator.

JC's avatar

I don't even think Darwin was a Darwinist...

buddhi's avatar

There is a non-zero chance those outer-space-aliens who have been flying around for 80 years planted the idea in Darwin's mind (as they do with all scientific discoveries) to misdirect us away from the fact they bioengineered us many times over the millennia. We are easily programmed soft robots who do as we are told. We have a basic subroutine that provides the belief that we are "human." This planet is likely a laboratory for alien Ai. This project has been operating hundreds of thousands of years, which implies that a long lived Ai is behind it.

Peggy's avatar

That's called Scientism. The Discovery Institute has confounded this dogma with <drum roll> Actual Science. I'm guessing you already know this as well as the erroneous assumptions adopted in 1850 (Pre- electron microscope).

Zade's avatar

They're a wonderful organization! I usually end up laughing when I read their articles, thinking how you have to have a very special kind of insanity to think mechanistic Darwinism can explain the findings they report.

George94's avatar

Same like they confounded complex injections with vaccination and allopathy with vaccination. Vaccination is based on the homeopathic law of similars and not darwinism. It is darwinism that is based on confounding cowpox with smallpox and vaccination with immunization.

https://hpathy.com/homeopathy-papers/hahnemanns-views-vaccination-reply-peter-fisher/

aprayerformonkey's avatar

keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: 1st Timothy 6:20

Julie Stander's avatar

Following the comment you made, we may compare Zionism and support of Israel to the medical religion.

SP's avatar

Of course we couldn't possibly get through a discussion about vaccines without bringing Israel into it. I'm surprised no one has griped about orange man, but then again, his haters are mostly the provax zombies and are not reading this. Zionism and support for Israel is Biblical.....period.

Zade's avatar

Thanks. I didn't want to get into a pissing match but I did think, oh boy here we go, someone has drag in the Jews and Zionism.

SP's avatar

It reminded me of another blog I was on a few weeks ago about a pastor in Louisiana I think, and his wife. There was a picture of them and his wife was wearing what I would call a very risque dress, definitely not modest and in my opinion, inappropriate. Many people were commenting on it from proponents to opponents, and wuddaya know someone had to bring Trump into it. The TDS and the antisemetism, as you say, makes me want to puke.

Zade's avatar
Feb 14Edited

Trump may not be perfect. But he's a man, and so many people now seem to be offended by a masculine guy. I love him for his courage.

R123 NEWS's avatar

“COURAGE” now there’s a word people have forgotten. Having and showing courage, selflessly, is a virtue that elevates a person from my perspective. My favorite people throughout history are those who were brave enough to be afraid but still do right. Or at least, their version of right. Benjamin Franklin is my idol. To stand before the crown and ask for independence on behalf of this group of people we now call Americans—that took layers of courage.

buddhi's avatar

Religion is still a potent control icon. The government controls conscious awareness with laws, whereas religion supports State control by controlling the subconscious with religious belief; the old one-two punch.

David Vella's avatar

As you interact with the vaccinism zealots, understand that it is not a religion in the traditional sense, but it is most definitely a delusional ideology just as are scientism, climate control/change, transgenderism and transhumanism.

John Davison's avatar

Carnegie and Rockefeller commissioned the Flexner Report 1910 which enabled them to close over half of US medical schools because they failed to meet new "scientific standards". Those that remained had to adopt a curriculum gased on Germ Theory and pharma drugs (all petro chemical based a la Rockefeller).

The reporty led to laws requiring licensure via the AMA which Rockefeller helped empower to ensure only allopathic doctors could legally practice.

Led to the creation of synthetic "vitamins" - which could be legally patented and owned.

Now a near 2 trillion dollar pa bigpharma industry. Why join the Mafia when you can make more money selling legal and deadly drugs/vaccines/gene therapies, and incredibly with a captured media, joe public adores them!

Pure genius. Capture putative medics from day one, make a fortune giving people "diseases" - in reality autoimune disease and make a bigger killing selling cures.

Not for nothing was Grandad Rockefeller a notorious snake oli salesman

Donna's avatar

It never made common sense to me if children's vaccines were so safe and effective, why schools mandate ALL children must be vaccinated.

George94's avatar

They don't. They mandate "immunization" and think homeopathy is a joke. Conflating allopathy with vaccination is a trojan horse.

https://hpathy.com/homeopathy-papers/hahnemanns-views-vaccination-reply-peter-fisher/

VictorDianne Watson's avatar

I am encouraged that we are turning a corner with vaccines. When the CDC reduced the number of recommended vaccines and stopped recommending Covid 19 shots for pregnant women and children, I cheered. Unfortunately, I learned from Maryanne Demasi that the changes for some recommendations never reached the offices and clinics. Heads should roll! Thanks, AMD.

Ellasquared's avatar

Infections aren't the problem and infections aren't diseases. That's the first point to tackle - and then thinking that symptoms must be stopped/prevented when the body is attempting to detox some toxic exposure, not due to being attacked by a microbe, through the typical natural symptoms of cough, sneezing, runny nose, fever, sore throat, headache, vomiting, diarrhea and often a rash, the visible manifestation of the body's attempt to purge the offender(s) toxins. Side effects of vaccines, symptoms of poisoning and encephalitis all share the same symptoms profile. The most critical thing to notice here is that people are so afraid of natural symptoms which they might not have ever developed due to exposure (this is where the term "herd immunity" came from, noticing some people never had symptoms despite exposure but somehow they were "immune" based merely on development of antibodies, which is also not the end point of immune function. Also there is no such thing as "auto immune" this is a term made up to distract from the real cause because the immune system does not attack itself, it attacks invaders, the injected types being the most potent People willingly accept the "normal" side effects of vaccine being the very symptoms they are told to fear when those symptoms are occur naturally and are time limited. When those symptoms are created by poisoning, they lead to chronic conditions, perpetuating the "need" for pHARMaceutical treatment (aka symptom suppression). Please make this make sense already.

Rob (c137)'s avatar

Sadly even many of those who question vaccines are caught up in the virology of vaccines as damaging, forgetting that vaccines have toxic adjuvants and preservatives which fully explain why they damage people.

With the COVID shots, there's an obsession with spike protein ignoring the fact that the lipid nanoparticles were problematic years before COVID spike protein existed.

https://robc137.substack.com/p/years-before-mrna-and-spike-protein

It's just like blaming the sv40 virus in previous shots glossing over that the adjuvants toxicity explains the issues already.

Occam's razor!

Kelleigh Nelson's avatar

Sorry, but I don't want any of the vaxes, NONE!

Guido Vandeven's avatar

Sorry to interrupt you but I get my doses of vaccines everyday…mosquitoes!

Kelleigh Nelson's avatar

Yes, thanks to the depopulation expert, Bill Gates. Sickening, isn't it.

Givenroom's avatar

You should ask his wife Melinda in what he’s also an expert, the reason why she quit…

SP's avatar

He's an expert in eugenics...just like his parents.

Rob (c137)'s avatar

I don't buy into the mosquito hype. They supposedly spread a sterilization gene and it didn't work.

Plus the danger of vaccines are the heavy metals and chemicals, not the "inactive virus".

Guido Vandeven's avatar

Mosquitos are very real and nasty, they spread covid like symptoms as well as influenza like illnesses; fever, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, break bone pains, muscle sores, paralysis and depression,…Sterilisation gene? I wouldn’t now, till here everything working, perhaps some urinary problems?

JC's avatar

Honestly, if you'd asked me in 2019 "where the plague was going to come from" I would've said mosquitoes.

Silly me, I didn't even consider the pangolin! ;)

SP's avatar

I've read a lot of stuff questioning virology period. Some say that viruses don't even exist because not one has ever been isolated using Koch's Postulates which is the gold standard. Have you seen any of the videos by Dr. Sam Bailey and her husband? Others have questioned the science as well.

Rob (c137)'s avatar

Yes. At first I was skeptical but after learning about the methods and how they detect viruses, I got a better picture of it all.

They're detecting damaged cells with RNA fragments as viruses. It's the result, not the cause of disease!

Ted VO's avatar

Siri's deposition of Stanley Plotkin (the vaccine godfather) elicited a number of damaging admissions that demonstrated that Plotkin is as monstrous as the vaccine program itself.

Guido Vandeven's avatar

Monstrous? Maybe maybe not but he sure is a high priest, a pope a godfather of vaccines. The highest authority.

Graphite's avatar

A great bit of video 👍🇨🇦

Rodney's avatar

"Vaccines" are like the "holocaust" honest skeptical debate is forbidden with either.

buddhi's avatar

Those who believe in vaccinations will vaxx their kids.

Thus, for good or ill, we'll see natural selection in action.

R. Toney Brooks, PhD's avatar

I wonder if the new Russian cancer vaccine, Enteromix, is an exception? It is said to have a 100% success rate in the initial trials. Russia is far more trustworthy, IMO, than the WHO-CDC crowd.

buddhi's avatar

It works by patient‑specific mRNA immune activation. Lots of people won't like that. They say it is safe but the risks are very likely underrated. 70% or so regression but will the cancers come back?

Guido Vandeven's avatar

I’ll believe them if they can show me for a start 10 thousand patients that got cured by this wonder vaccine.

Kelleigh Nelson's avatar

THAT MAY WELL BE TRUE!

BethanyAnne's avatar

How utterly unsurprising.

I have been shouting for literal decades, how do you think the studies and clinical trials are going to turn out when you have the manufacturers themselves paying for them? Any time I hear, "but this or that study says..." my first question is, just who paid for that study?

I don't believe any of these people anymore. Their clinical trials and peer reviewing are just so much bullshit. They've been fudging them for decades. And just who are the poor slobs they get to sign up for this crap? Wild horses couldn't drag me to "volunteer" for ANY clinical trial.

The funniest part is them screaming their heads off about ANY sort of pricing regulations, saying that their R&D costs are too high, and how are we ever going to discover a cure for cancer if you steal our profit margins??? Like every time a cure for cancer has come up, they haven't ruthlessly tried to squash and/or discredit it. So many things available to try out there (much to Pharma's dismay), chemo and radiation are absolutely the LAST things I will try.

OT, I'm reading a book on commercial vs herbal antibiotics. We are in deep doo-doo, folks. Better learn the herbal types, cause I'd say within 20 years, none of the commercial types will work much anymore. And FFS, stay out of the hospital, they're breeding grounds for building resistant pathogens.