154 Comments
Jun 23, 2022Liked by A Midwestern Doctor

The complete disregard of 'a second opinion', has been one of the more interesting developments surrounding the CV disaster. It was like finding a mole on your forearm was a basal cell and as a treatment the dermatologist recommended cutting your arm off. Most people would question that recommendation and seek out a second opinion. But with CV, it was trust the experts ! Just not those who are actually working on the front lines. The constant gaslighting is one of the most infuriating issues about this whole debacle.

Expand full comment

The "mole on the arm" is a great metaphore. How about for a mole on your face? (Cut off your head?) Lol!

Of course that would be insane, but, come to think of it, the people behind creating the bioweapons (both the SARS-CoV-2 virus AND the "vaccine" bioweapons) ARE insane!

Expand full comment

100% - when they started rejecting and dismissing all valid opposition, I knew they were up to some shady shit. From that moment on I have viewed all of their moves with suspicion, and the majority of my suspicions have been confirmed.

Expand full comment
Jun 23, 2022Liked by A Midwestern Doctor

Imagine we had actually treated it instead of all this drama. That'd be a world to live in.

Expand full comment
author

Our system has been becoming progressively more corrupt over the decades, and many commentators I have spoken with believe the only thing that can reverse this is something truly catastrophic occurring as a consequence of excessive corruption (such as millions dying from the vaccinations that should have never been put on the market).

Expand full comment

I hear that. It's difficult to imagine what save a cataclysm of that order could clear out the current impurities in the system. (Interesting. Apparently cataclysm means "deluge," and originally referred to the Biblical flood.)

I wish the medical and public health establishments had treated covid along the lines you sketch out in this essay: with bolstering immunity through supplements, with early treatment protocols using commonly available medications for those who do get sick, and perhaps with UV or ozone-based air purification systems that might well protect us from future outbreaks also.

Sometimes we hear about the difference that modern hygiene innovations have made (sewer systems and what have you) in increasing our health and longevity. I kind of doubt anything I'm told these days, but that line of thinking does make some sense to me. Perhaps one day we'll look back at the time before widespread ozone purification as akin to the days when sewage flowed through the streets and horse poop was everywhere.

I'm also grateful for the even-handedness in an article like this one. I confess that, psychologically battered as I have been by some of this (I know I'm in good company there), it's easy for me to start throwing in behind the "covid was never real" and "all medical interventions are worse than useless" tendencies of thought, when what I really mean is, "Wow, lockdowns were a heavy price to pay (for dubious gains)," and, "I really don't trust these injections and the way they've been pushed on us."

This whole imbroglio has torn us down and torn us apart. Yet it wants to heal something in me when I think (however wistfully) of how it might have been, when I consider that there really are doctors out there who can find treatments that work, even for a novel virus, and can go about calmly treating patients so that they get well. (Imagine!)

What if that's just what we had experienced, instead of all of this exaggerated fear, division and loathing of one another, damage to society and the economy, etc?

What if what if what if

Expand full comment
author

You hit the nail in the head. I completely understand why it is very easy to go down that path of thinking, and one of the things I am trying to do is be a force against that (somewhat related, I feel most of the issues our society faces now are ultimately a crisis of the mind and spirit and that is where things need to be addressed; physical interventions for the body at best are a patchwork solution). My own relatively naive viewpoint is that if something is true and it is clearly presented in a genuine fashion, most people will listed. The success of this substack seems to support that hypothesis.

Expand full comment

Everyone has innate logic and reason. We use this every day, and in our work, for example, we can be very good at understanding various logics (the logic of building a house, for example.) But many don't take that innate ability and understand that we can apply that to anything, and we can even question the experts if the concepts they present to us make no sense. So now we get things like: 'what, are you a doctor?' No, but any of us can understand medical concepts; we are truly our own authorities regarding what touches our own lives.

The Dream of Reason is another animal altogether as this is really a narrative and a story. Like, for example, in Klaus Schwab's book, 'The Great Narrative,' which is a perverse dream of a global government to 'stay safe.' We need none of it.

This is partly why they now want us to give validity to narratives and to stories about fluid reality (gender?) This is how we undermine reason, and the sleep of reason produces monsters. A lot of people understand this, but the newspapers keep telling us to listen to the authorities, who, as The Midwestern Doctor and others demonstrate, may actually be highly irrational because they're following a dream and a narrative. They're literally caught in unreality.

Logic is the sword because it clarifies concepts and contradictions, and through that we can separate dream from reality. So yes, a crisis of the mind and spirit; a crisis of seeing, and of being confused because we're being bombarded with narratives. Like Covid, like monkeypox. Like catastrophic climate change, which isn't real but is most certainly the central character in the dream of reason called The Great Reset, and supplies nearly the entire justification for a global government to 'stay safe.'

Expand full comment
author

On somewhat of a related point, I have the interesting experience of debating these types of concepts with skeptical parties prior to becoming a doctor, and in most cases regardless of what I said the response I would receive was "you are not a doctor so you have no basis for providing an opinion on this medical issue. "The fascinating thing I discovered was that after I became a doctor, these people would still refuse to listen and they were just pick a different excuse, so I have always felt the requirement to be a doctor just speak on medical issues is kind of silly.

Expand full comment

The response to this 'catastrophe' is already baked in!

They saw it coming because it was always the plan.

"The SPARS Pandemic 2025–2028:"

"A Futuristic Scenario to Facilitate Medical Countermeasure Communication"

"ACKNOWLEDGING LOSS"

CHAPTER EIGHTEEN

At the request of HHS Secretary Nagel, ASPR convened a series of meetings among senior leadership of the federal health agencies to address policy and program changes being implemented as a result of a departmental review of the response to the SPARS pandemic. Among the issues considered were the implications of growing negative public opinion regarding Corovax and the government’s perceived indifference to victims of the public health response to SPARS. One senior health official argued that time and a robust medical monitoring program for vaccine recipients—the components of which were already in place—should be sufficient to determine whether public concern about long-term effects was, in fact, warranted: “We have to wait for the data. People need to understand that fact.”

Expand full comment
author

I have mentioned this in earlier posts, but one of the things that made me be able to predict exactly how the entire pandemic would turn out was because I read through the entire SPARS exercise and then had the unfortunate experience over and over I've seen exactly what was written in there come true.

Expand full comment

I hesitate to ask about Chapters 19 and 20.

Expand full comment

Check it out, it's online. Have to be careful you don't get the discussion 'guide' instead of the real thing.

https://irp.cdn-website.com/e6ed1e5c/files/uploaded/The%20Spars%20Pandemic%202025-2028%20A%20Futuristic%20Scenario%20for%20Public%20Health%20Risk%20Communications%20by%20The%20John%20Hopkins%20Center%20For%20Health%20Security.pdf

SPARS AFTERMATH

CHAPTER NINETEEN

Today, nearly five years since the St. Paul Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus made its global debut, there remain human cases in 14 countries across Europe, Africa, and Asia. The pandemic officially ended in August 2028, but the virus persists in domesticated animal reservoirs. WHO experts hypothesize that small, isolated outbreaks of SPARS were occurring long before the disease emerged on a global scale in 2025, and they anticipate that future outbreaks will continue to emerge unless countries maintain widespread vaccination coverage.

Expand full comment

The last sentence still implies, that the coronavirus vax stops infection

Expand full comment

It’s the same old song with a twist.

Expand full comment

Well of course it does (not).

Expand full comment

Distribute Vitamin D to the population - Yes! First on the list, in BOLD. Yes indeed.

Vitamin C, Zinc, Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin - yes. Ideally, magnesium chelate too.

However, an ordinary healthy vitamin D3 supplemental intake - such as (for 70 kg 154 lb bodyweight) 0.125 mg 5000 IU/day - takes months to raise 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels from typical baselines such as 18 ng/mL to the 50 ng/mL needed for proper immune system function, including reduced risk of wildly dysregulated inflammation.

For actual infections, bolus vitamin D3 (10 mg 400,000 IU) will raise 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels over 50 ng/mL in about 4 days. Best of all, a single oral dose of calcifediol, which _is_ 25-hydroxyvitamin D, will raise circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels safely over 50 ng/mL in about 4 hours. This is by far the most important early treatment for those who have not been supplementing vitamin D for months, and who have not recently had a lot of UV-B skin exposure.

Please see the research articles cited at: https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/ and https://nutritionmatters.substack.com/p/calcifediol-to-boost-25-hydroxyvitamin .

Expand full comment

The UK was distributing vitamin D to vulnerable people in the winter of 2020-2021. So they were doing better than the US. It was only 400 IU, so that really wouldn't have helped much. Hopefully it at least raised awareness some as well.

Expand full comment

Just make sure it's protected from oxygen until use.

Expand full comment
Jun 23, 2022·edited Jun 23, 2022Liked by A Midwestern Doctor

Above all, I am fond of the doctor here; he always stays open and unjudgmental and even answers questions, despite his overwhelming site traffic.

Yes, everything was a theater to begin with, but let's add the fraudulent and dangerous tests and, of course, the lethal injections that maim or kill "safely and effectively."

Of course, the "pandemic" was far from being mishandled; everything followed a schedule, a means to the same end.

Now, what would (have been) a sensible approach to handling the situation?

1. Suspending the announcement of a "pandemic" would have been a sensible approach until it would have been proven to exist. In 2020, fewer-than-usual people died by August in the five countries I checked (USA, Canada, Germany, Hungary, and I forget the fifth), so there was no sign of a "pandemic."

It would have been nice, if someone had proved it first that "viral infections" actually exist. At the age of five, I tried for infectious diseases (went to stay at a hospital for "epidemic-causing illnesses" on my own accord, because I was curious about hospitals) and miserably failed getting sick (in a room for 28 little boys, nobody contracted anything from anyone and doctors and nurses were not falling like flies). My experience has been confirmed by several serious (unpaid) resources in the last two years...

2. Second, the most powerful mode of mass manipulation was implemented during the plandemic, driving people nearly insane with fear:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-most-powerful-mode-of-manipulation

One must always be cautious, when such a powerhouse is activated to manipulate people...

Expand full comment
Jun 23, 2022·edited Jun 23, 2022

The PCR-Test plandemic was handled exactly the way it was supposed to be.

They did exactly what you'd expect from ineptocrats.

They did exactly what they did in Afghanistan for 20 years:

1- Bomb and kill indiscriminately with no strategies and no goals (quackcination!)

2- When you encounter a resistance, just ask for a surge (booster!!)

3- When surge #1 fails, ask for surge #2 (booster#2),

4- When surge #2 fails, ask for surge #3 (booster #3)

ad infinitum.

5-If you want to bombard a different country (money pox!), just stop the first war.

$2 Trillion spent. No strategies, no goals!!!

That's how an Ineptocracy works.

Expand full comment
author

That is an interesting metaphor I did not think of. Thank you!

Expand full comment

I lived in a rural barracks town in Chile in Oct 2019, when the troops that participated in the Wuhan military olympics returned from Wuhan sick with Covid19. I coincidentally got an MRI for my hip where I suppose I used the machine after a troop with a severe respiratory disease from Wuhan must have used it, because I was developing pneumonia before my husband got home from work, and I knew I had gotten it from the piped in air coming out an inch from my mouth inside the tube. I survived it, had symptoms and immunity to the Italian strain for long afterwards, then also treated myself with Hydroxychloroquin (after being misdiagnosed with RA). I spoke with people on the street afterwards because I never took the mask mandate terribly seriously, and I would say, don't worry, I already had it. The common response was, "Haven't we all..." No one would report that they got it for fear of being sent home without pay, and herd immunity was well underway MONTHS before the news came out in mid March about the Italian strain. At one point I had a good half dozen workers sick with it in my patio, lethargic, with fever, sneezing, etc, before there was any protocol set in place. We could have and should have ignored it, and those that got sick should have gotten paid to stay home for 2 weeks.

Expand full comment
author

This is really interesting (I have not heard any first hand accounts of this happening so your story is quite important). I understand the need for anonymity on here, but do you have any records or documentation backing up your story?

Expand full comment

I have my MRI dated the 24th of October, and my experience of being exposed to the Italian variant was on March 14-15th when the builder was working on my home, and I got a slight delerium around dinnertime and took a nap until 2am, when I woke up perfectly fine. That was when I concluded I must have already had it to have not gotten a fever like the workers. But mostly it is just what I have pieced together on my own having seen the military always on their way to or from the barracks prior to Oct. 18th(when there was a planned metro attack in Santiago and we decided I should get the MRI before they attacked the hospitals). After the 18th we never saw them on the streets again as the entire country was under seige with burning tires on many intersections, rocks through glass hospital doors, etc. Personally I felt the seige was like a trial run for the next years' riots in the USA, with many of the same type of lootings and the same allegations that the police were putting people's eyes out with rubber bullets. I had looked into the Wuhan games and heard they were around the 18 and I felt that it just seemed too coincidental with the riots here, then it all moving to the USA and repeating. As soon as I realized I had already had it, I took a box of HCQ I had been given to see it it would fix the feeling of fire in my veins, especially my hands and feet, and I was delighted to find it relieved it. I have that prescription still, based on very flimsy evidence of RI. I took it for 20 months until the misdiagnosis was detected by a real specialist after moving closer to civilization. I started conversing with people on the street about it right after mid March 2020and it seemed to have whipped through town probably after whipping through the barracks. I hope that helps; I am not sure what parts interest you particularly. You are welcome to contact me if you need more info.

Expand full comment
author

Thank you, that was quite helpful.

Expand full comment

Consider that we are looking at a ‘virus’ that cannot be identified as SARS-CoV-2 (there is no evidence), so that’s the end of that story. It was man made on a computer by Drosten et al in Berlin in January 2020 for reasons that we all know.

The average age of a death by or with "Covid-19" is higher than life expectancy. No other figure even need be known to understand the "pandemic" (business model) is a fraud and a giant Ponzi scheme.

The fact that there is no such thing as a "Covid death" is another minor problem here as SARSCoV2 itself is a computer generated fiction.

Everything you see or read is an orchestrated narrative that's been crafted to sell a story for you to believe- that's the big lie they don't want you to understand.

You were not alerted to a "pandemic-level pathogenic disease causing agent" by your own senses, observations or experience. You were conditioned by propaganda to believe in a pandemic-level pathogenic disease causing agent by the media, the pharmaceutical industry, and government.

99% of people falsely certified as having 'died from covid' actually died from their preexisting conditions being exacerbated by mass medical malpractice and 'public health' despotism, the other 1% simply died of old age.

From the CDC itself 7/16/21: "Of the 540,667 hospitalized coronavirus patients included in the study, 80,174 died during the observation period (March 2020 to March 2021). A whopping 99.1% of the patients who died had at least one pre-existing condition, with just 740 having no prior condition on record.

Most patients who died from COVID had multiple pre-existing conditions, with just 2.6% suffering from only one condition, compared to 32.3% who had two to five preexisting conditions, 39.1% who had six to ten, and 25.1% who have more than ten pre-existing conditions."

Translation: No one has 'died from covid' as "covid" is nothing more than a fraudulent PCR result plus a nebulous clinical re-branding of cold, "flu" and many other disease conditions.

Covid-19 is the biggest money laundering scheme in the history of this country.

Expand full comment

Nice collection of facts that the official narrative keeps contradicting with!

Nobody died of "covid," indeed, because the invented illness cannot even be properly diagnosed.

Still, it would be nice to identify those, who were causing the symptoms...

The game-masters are making fun of their victims: they are finding it nice to make the condemned pay for the rope they are hanged with.

Still, it is not about money; the perpetrators have access to an unlimited amount of money from their central banks, financed by the taxpayer.

The eugenicist technocrats even announced the objective: control and genocide.

And while we are pondering over the controlled demolition of the USD, the noose is tightening... Food and energy shortages first...

Expand full comment

I think the goal of the plandemic was to user in the "Great Reset". Be that financial and or biomedical type control.

Expand full comment
author

It's very possible. I can't read minds so I can't say with any certainty if that was the original goal, but I frequently consider that possibility.

Expand full comment

Not only that, but if one looks closely at the theory of catastrophic CO2 warming (which is essentially radiative epicycles to prop up a theory) one realizes that it's terrible science. So this has led me to speculate that the entire purpose of the theory of catastrophic CO2 warming was/is to serve as justification for The Great Reset, because without the theory, the Reset is completely unnecessary.

Covid has opened many eyes to how corrupt things are. But this corruption even touches things that some of us thought were certain and irrefutable science.

Not to plug my substack, but I've already written about global warming regarding reef science and my next big project is to dismantle the logic of the physical theory. It's important to do this because catastrophic CO2 warming will be the bludgeon used to herd us into the Great Reset. The theory must be dismantled: it must be shown to be logically contradictory.

Expand full comment
author
Jun 23, 2022·edited Jun 23, 2022Author

The whole global warming thing is really painful for me to watch because I worked in an environmental program when it took off, and I literally had to see everybody throw away the legitimate environmental activism (such as preventing companies from producing acid rain that destroyed the landscape) to a futile obsession with reducing carbon dioxide under any cost which basically just meant buying an (environmentally destructive) Prius and calling it a day.

Expand full comment

Agree. There are real problems. There are real pollutants. CO2 isn't a pollutant; it's essential for life on earth.

Expand full comment

Yes the CO2 is the next crisis other than Ukraine. There's the push or should I say force to electric cars and such. Even though we can't produce enough electricity to power the cars out there now. I'm sure the WEF and or some other weathly people come up with another crisis soon. Most likely the failure of the money system. To force everyone onto CBDC.

Expand full comment

I agree, also to usher in an authoritarian government!

Expand full comment

I said early on we should have HCQ/Z-Pak/Zinc/Vit D/ASA 'dospaks' hanging in every checkout line in America for a tax deductible $5 all within the two weeks and could have done it for less than 10 billion dollars .

And if we had done this the "heart problems" from all the HCQ dispensed would have not even been a fraction of the cluster we now see not in the making, but already made!

Expand full comment

Valuable perspective. I was lucky - in summer 2020, I came across a Quillette article by Jonathan Kay that said spreading could be reduced by proper airflow, so I knew that where ventilation was possible, it would reduce transmission. Worked at a school whose director had students in classes under awnings/tents outdoors until too cold. I opened windows whenever possible. Will suggest UV to younger family who work in corporations, in case the President's prediction of another pandemic comes true.

Expand full comment

As always, your extremely well thought-out and laid-out information is excellent - and so very crucial for other medical professionals to read and learn. I pray they do.

Expand full comment
author

Thank you for your support!

Expand full comment
Jun 23, 2022Liked by A Midwestern Doctor

This is a SUPERB interview...only 30 mins and worth every minute of it...."The consequences of vaccine mandates.....My conversation with Canadian social scientist Kevin Bardosh, lead author of a recent paper on COVID-19 vaccine policy in the BMJ Global Health medical journal".....https://tarahenley.substack.com/p/the-consequences-of-vaccine-mandates?utm_source=podcast-email%2Csubstack&utm_medium=email#details

Expand full comment
Jun 23, 2022Liked by A Midwestern Doctor

An excellent and sensible approach to Covid.

Expand full comment

Unfortunately all advocates for a "Sensible Approach" were marginalized or outright cancelled;

nurses and doctors were 'disciplined" and even lost their professional licenses. The wrong "experts" gained pre-eminence. To prevent a repeat of such disastrous responses to the next outbreak, epidemic or pandemic, epistemic trespassing should be formally outlawed, and perpetrators prosecuted.

Expand full comment
Jul 5, 2022Liked by A Midwestern Doctor

There are now dozens of studies that have proven the efficacy and safety of Far-UV Sterilray continues to be ignored by healthcare. The shame is that, as pathogens go, coronaviruses are easy to destroy with Far-UV.

222nm (Far-UV Sterilray™) lamps in a room gives the same level of protection as everyone in the room wearing N95 masks! Another needed layer of defense.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76597-y

222nm light is the only tech that does NOT rely on air circulation to destroy viruses in the air instantly. Safe for humans info@sterilray com

Equates to >182 air changes/hour‬

https://go.nature.com/3sDFqJP‬

info@sterilray.com

Expand full comment