692 Comments
author
Apr 6, 2023·edited Apr 6, 2023Pinned

A few common themes have emerged in the comments. I will try to address each.

•Regardless of who wins the election, RFK will still be able to make a massive impact on the vaccine issue prior to when voting begins because he will force the topic into the public discourse.

•RFK has to run in the Democratic Primaries. It is the place where has by far the biggest ability to influence the public sphere since there are presently no strong candidates to run against him in the Democratic primaries.

•If you want to vote for Trump, you can still vote for RFK in the Democratic Primaries (since Trump has such a large lead in the Republic primaries, it is unlikely a vote for him will influence his chances of winning the primary) and then vote for Trump in the general election.

Since people feel very strongly about this issue, I will focus on addressing the comments in the article I just posted about the relative benefits and harms of each vaccine on the CDCs vaccine schedule.

Please join me there once you have time to read the article. A lot of work went into it and it has been very well received thusfar. It can be viewed here:

https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/what-are-the-risks-and-benefits-of

Expand full comment
author

Also in the future I will write an article on my thoughts on global warming and clean energy.

Briefly, I believe viable energy technologies have existed for decades (and I know how they work) that would address our energy needs, but they have been deliberately kept off the market to maintain the scarcity of energy. I also think the global warming thing was put forward to have a nebulous target that could never be met and used to both distract from legitimate sources of environmental pollution and to have more and more justifications to control the population.

Expand full comment

Global warming gave reasons other than peak-oil to deal with peak-oil. The political class can only deal with any issue through lying. It's the best they could to.

That's not to say there isn't climate change and environmental devastation of many kinds, man-made and natural-episodic, but they don't really care, or want us all to do well, not at all.

Bobby Jr. has my support, and my prayers for a long life, at least 10 more years.

Expand full comment

Climate change and peak oil seem to pair nicely with depopulation vaccines and locking people in their homes.

Expand full comment

"Climate change and peak oil seem to pair nicely with depopulation vaccines and locking people in their homes."

If you are attracted to simplistic "solutions" they do.

One bunch of people kiling another bunch, or sacrificing them to the Sun God are historical manifestations of this approach to bad harvests.

What is your suggested mode of dealing with declining resources?

Mine is to grow a kitchen garden, ride a bike, be a human among humans and to seek divine guidance.

I must face reality as it unfolds, and not by secretly killing other people, nor by suicide.

Expand full comment

Resources have been declining forever. I have a book about presidents and it shows a newspaper headline about Thomas Jefferson winning the election. Under that article is another one about how we are running out of tin. We use tin for everything like roofs and pots and pans and utensils and there's no more easily minable. This was in the 1800s. Do you miss having tin utensils? People are creative if we let them be and we will find new resources.

Expand full comment

I'm glad you are working the problem, Don. So am I.

What'cha got?

I've mostly got vegetable gardens and the energy efficient house I designed and just finished building-out inside, the insulation, walls, floors and cabinets.

Stainless steel is good, and lasts a long time.

Jefferson was a really good vegetable gardener, I have learned. I turn out to be using some of his seeds and techniques today. I'm not saying he was perfect; a product of his times, and place...

Expand full comment

Are you connected to that beautiful eponymous park outside Madras, Oregon?

I think most climate sceptics do not deny it is changing only that CO2 is a facile metric and temperature measurements are prone to many confounding factors.

What is not dependent on modelling by interested parties, is biodiversity loss which is largely driven by us but the "us" in the vanguard are big Agri/Pharma/Defence and similar corporate interests...

No matter, the solution is the same: give the masters of the universe the power to complete our enslavement - and subsequent reduction from 8B to 0.5, oops!

Expand full comment

You mention CO2 - what is never addressed nor is there really any assessment of overall impact, is that increased CO2 has a dramatic effect of plant growth. This leads to absorption of sunlight, that energy being turned into organic material (some of which can feed people!), and release of O2. The increase in tree cover drops temperatures, so how this actually works out is a complex calculus of multiple variables.

I'd settle for getting rid of plastic water in bottles, for a start! Plastics appear more problematic than temperature.

And to demonstrate how LITTLE we actually know, you may recall a massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. "The beaches are DESTROYED! All of the fish in the ocean & in the marshes/bayous in Louisiana will be killed. We are ALL GOING TO DIE!" You could buy a beachfront condo on the Gulf coast for pocket change. As I was discussing with a patient yesterday, how I WISH I had the foresight to have picked up some of those beach properties!

We don't know squat, and the arrogance in claiming that a system such as the earth's ecosystem is understood is laughable.

Expand full comment

Would echo your prayer that Bobby Jr. has a long life. Should he not abandon the DemoCrat party as it no longer is about feeding the hungry and clothing the naked ?The elephant has been radicalized into some thing unrecognizable. Suggesting that the political elite could do no better? I could mention a some patriots that disavow that assertion...

Expand full comment

Dear MW Doc, I laughed a lot with your first graph but it has a mistake: the right has also BEEN shifted to the left (for example, think about "gay pride" and same-sex marriage, compulsory taught with Comprehensive Sexuality Education brainwashing generations ... look at StopCSE.com ).

What you and RFK don't get is that the system is rigged: it was created by masons (French and American Revolutions) for the masons: think about it... if masons infiltrate and control both parties, there's no democracy, just a uniparty as Tucker Carlson likes to remind us.

Guess who started the Ukraine war in 2014: mason Obama. Not a Neocon project but a mason Pearl Harbor event: rigged for the fall of Putin, who was against the mason New World Order. Check who funded the 30 biowar labs in Ukraine: the NIH? no, the masons there... under mason Fauci!

Think about Trump: probably half of his cabinet were masons. Not to mention the masons controlling the administration (Fauci, Collins, etc.). He was surrounded! Not much he could do!

The mason press, mainstream media is set to destroy any original idea.

One example: the Government spends 3000 million on abortion per year (most, funding Planned Parenthood). Trump only slashed 60 million: he didn't have what it takes to confront the administration, risking impeachment and jail to save the lives of all those babies.

RFK is great... but he still believes de decarb hoax and I'm not sure if he's prolife, the ultimate touchstone for integrity.

Green communism sucked 200 trillion from taxpayers:

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/best-scientific-sources-to-debunk

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/killing-me-softly-with-green-songs

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/carbon-reparations

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/climate-deaths

It’s the masons, dummy!

In 1921, the Council on Foreign Relations was founded, to infiltrate and control democracy, by freemasons David Rockefeller, Paul Warburg, Herbert Hoover, Allen Dulles, Walter Lippmann and Edward M. House. The impressive 10-thousand members list proves the power grab was successful.1 Since 1921, the CFR has chosen every single Secretary of State. Similar mason institutions, most with similar names, were founded in over 100 countries, including Britain's Royal Institute of International Affairs and the European Council on Foreign Relations2: practically, there’s no war where the CFR isn’t involved on both sides. 3 Their magazine Foreign Affairs is one way they send orders to all members.

In 2018, Wikileaks proved the CFR controlled all mainstream media.4

Hoover, Truman, Eisenhower, Bush father and son, Carter, Clinton, Obama 5 ... some argue that, with few exceptions like JFK and Trump, at least since WWII, all US presidents were freemasons and many CFR. All administrations were filled with thousands of CFR members. 6 The Trump administration was no exception. 7 It’s not a coincidence that Neil M. Gorsuch, CFR Supreme Court Justice appointed by Trump, betrayed conservatives by ruling in favour of homosexual marriage and other New World Order “progressive” agenda.

Another proof of grooming for infiltration: 28 Jun 2019 Democrat Tulsi Gabbard wasn’t renewed 5 CFR year membership. 8 Because she wouldn’t obey all orders? In 2020, she was still pro-homo-marriage9 and pro-abortion (a basic CFR request) and pro-Biden, but wanted paper ballots, Electoral College, supported Trump in breaking up Big Tech and removing their censorship through section 23010, Glass-Steagall, pro-natalism paid family and medical leave plans up to 12 weeks, less public and defense spending, drug patent breaking, no war.11 That’s probably why she was defamed by Kamala12, Hillary Clinton and mason Mitt Romney.13 In 2021, she questioned Fauci on COVID origin and masks.14 Tulsi was groomed by WEF in the "Forum of Young Global Leaders" but suddenly was disappeared, and not because she turned 38 (41 in 2023), the WEF cut-off limit for “young”, freemason Macron (45) is still in the search results. Fremason Trudeau, 51, isn’t, but is listed in weforum.org15, while Tulsi has been erased from there, in Apr 2022 (she independized from the Democratic party in Oct 2022).16 Maybe this was the drop that filled the cup: she’s against CBDCs and social scoring.17

https://www.younggloballeaders.org/community

The CFR is just a small piece of a large puzzle of thousands of organizations, for example:

9-11: 2 planes, all 7 WTC towers down, but not the closest non-WTC !

What’s the chance of this?: 11 Sep 1991, exactly a decade before 9-11 (2001), George Bush (father) said “What is at stake, is more than one small country - it is a big idea - a New World Order where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause... to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind - peace and security, freedom and the rule of law.. out of these humble times, our fifth objective - the New World Order - can emerge, [and] now we can see a new world coming into view. A world in which there is a very real prospect of a New World Order…” 18

September, 2000, one year before 9/11, Neo-Con think tank, “Project for the New American Century” (PNAC) 19 sustained: “the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.” PNAC members included Bush Administration insiders such as Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Libby and Perle.” 20

More here:

The 2020 and 2022 rigged and stolen elections (it’s the machines!):

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-2020-american-coup

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/david-rockefeller-illuminati

J6: what THEY don't want YOU to know

The fake riot was mason-planned, incited and guided by FBI agents, who broke into the Capitol !!!

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/j6-what-you-need-to-know

Are we crazy to accept demo-crazy?

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/democracy-democrazy

It sucks! We need to improve democracy… how about REAL democracy?

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/reinventing-democracy

The full PLAN exposed:

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-plan-revealed

Gates-WHO depop vaccines:

Proof: it was never for health and reduced mortality, only for infertilizing, handicapping and murdering!

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/depop-vaccines-no-myth

The threat of the WHO sovereignty-grab by the IHR and International PLANdemc Treaty:

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-threat-of-the-international-plandemic

Expand full comment

"What you and RFK don't get is that the system is rigged."

What amazes me is that so few people realize that and I have tons of proof of your claim's veracity.

Here's just one example.:

“[Teddy]Roosevelt then said : "Pettigrew, you know the two old parties are just alike. They are both controlled by the same influences…”

- R. F. Pettigrew, “Imperial Washington,” The story of American Public life from 1870 to 1920 (1922), p 234

https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt/search?q1=amiable;id=yale.39002002948025;view=1up;seq=7;start=1;sz=10;page=search;orient=0

The whole criminal enterprise is controlled by a relative handful of money creators and has been since 1913. I have tons of proof for that claim as well if anyone cares.

Expand full comment

December 23rd 1913 to be exact!

Expand full comment

Yeah and War is a Racket, for sure.

Nice to meet ya, Gen'l !!! ; )

Expand full comment

Likewise!

Expand full comment

Physicist mathematician James McCanney estimates votes for Trump were 90 to 10 and look who got installed. It is rigged. RFK's run may illuminate more minds but will have no effect on the outcome which is rigged.

Expand full comment
Apr 25, 2023·edited Apr 25, 2023

Yep. I hope this isn't true: "“The DNC, at this point, has taken the official position that there will be no debate, and I think that’s unfortunate… I think what the DNC did to New Hampshire is also unfortunate,” Kennedy Jr. told the host, Breitbart News Senior Editor-at-Large Joel Pollak, about the DNC changing the primary system to have the states Biden did better in first."

https://www.breitbart.com/2024-election/2023/04/24/marianne-williamson-joins-rfk-jr-in-slamming-dnc-for-no-debates-during-democrat-primary/

As I said before, the swamp would eat him alive.

Expand full comment

The swamp rats control everything. With Kennedy getting into bed with a skunk, they've already started to undermine him.

For some insights into how the system works, there's a really interesting book on how the globalists, through their agent, the USA, has been managing the Philippines since 1898. It is full of details on how they go about subverting any movements at independence, and control all aspects of the political system., Make no mistake, the USA is totally enslaved to them, has been for some time and we're subject to relentless infiltration and subversion in many of the same ways.

Well worth a read.: Policing America's Empire: The United States, the Philippines, and the Rise of the Surveillance State (New Perspectives in SE Asian Studies) Paperback – Illustrated, October 15, 2009

by Alfred W. McCoy

Expand full comment

I read the book The Rise of the New World Order, the Culling of Man. Spot on.

Expand full comment

Wow!! Thank you for this. JFK - assassinated by the CIA and Trump was relentlessly attacked by the media, Russia hoax, etc and presently accused of made up crimes. This Administration targeting their political opponent. He showed me there is no difference between R&D will always be grateful for that and he has 100% of my support. And yes the system is rigged

Expand full comment
Apr 7, 2023·edited Apr 8, 2023

It becomes obvious that lots of commonly, now accepted, practices are actually designed to destroy society, including mixed-sex education, which instinctively distracts both sexes; mixed-sex work places/meetings can be distracting too. Sex education in schools is one of these evil created practices. Girls need to be told about menstruation, but no more until they are married. All Romantic (Courtly Love [narcissism and promiscuity]) practices, like expensive gifts, fake chivalry, seduction, causal sex, dating, and courting, are destructive and evil.

Who were behind the Freemasons? Satanic Babylon, and it's followers, including Black Magi and the Pharisees, the latter of whom rebranded as Orthodox "Jew" Rabbis. These fake-jew rabbis stated that Freemasonry is Judaism (actually Pharisaism, aka Satanism) for Gentiles. A lot of ancient Egyptian religion is involved in Freemasonry, to disguise the Satanism, e.g. the Academy Awards also have blatant ancient Egyptian symbolism and a chequered floor. A lot, about this hidden-in-plain-sight evil, and how it is hidden, most-everywhere, can be found at https://www.bitchute.com/channel/NYZMjDr6JOG3/ and https://www.thedisclosurehub.com/ Plenty of this not NSFW, and some is horrific!

Expand full comment

"the ultimate touchstone for integrity"

Amen. 👏👏👏

Expand full comment

I’ve had the highest respect and admiration for all you’ve written over the past few months. But from the couple sentences you just wrote about global warming it sounds like you are dismissing the reality of it, and the existential risk to all of us. I will attempt to reserve judgment until I read your more detailed post but I hope you’re won’t be denying the reality of the climate crisis

Expand full comment
author
Apr 6, 2023·edited Apr 6, 2023Author

There is no proven link between carbon dioxide levels and atmospheric temperatures (whereas there are a variety of other factors that have a much stronger correlation). I worked in the environmental movement when the global warming thing took off and I watched everyone get hysterical about carbon dioxide and stop caring about all the major sources of environmental pollution environmental activist had previously fought to oppose. Since that time, all of the predicted temperature changes have never materialized, so the war against carbon dioxide got changed to fighting "climate change "rather than "global warming." Likewise, many of the "green" energy technologies we have introduced are environmentally destructive even if they produce less carbon dioxide. As a long time environmentalist, I have very strong objections to how the modern environmental movement was hijacked. The key thing to understand is that carbon dioxide levels are a nebulous target, so no matter what is done, it will never be enough and this paradigm will continue forever at the expense of all other environmental issues.

Expand full comment
Apr 6, 2023·edited Apr 6, 2023

As a Geoscientist, I agree. Not only are we NOT warming, but we need MORE CO2 not less, as I addressed in another comment just now.

Yes, many of the "green" energy "solutions" are much more environmentally damaging and polluting - not to mention only increase human rights abuses, like adult & child slavery - and they are incapable of producing enough energy to power a modern society, and our rickety electrical distribution system really can't handle anything else added to it.

And, I think that's the entire point. The psychopathic Powers That Shouldn't Be want total control over us, and the perfect way to make that happen is to take away our vehicles (via forcing us out of gas/diesel vehicles, with those rich enough into EVs, which aren't able to last long term, so we're ALL out of vehicles) and destroy cheap, reliable energy production and distribution. Yes, hydrocarbon energy pollutes, but the emissions from coal and natural gas fired power plants is scrubbed, and so are vehicle emissions to a large degree, so the really bad stuff is removed prior to release into the atmosphere.

You hinted at some "buried" technologies that could supply "cleaner" energy (including for vehicles?) - it will be interesting to see what you describe.

Also, Dr. Patrick Moore, who founded and was CEO? of Greenpeace since it's founding, has described why he left GP... Because they jumped on board the CO2-blaming team (lotsa money & exposure) and virtually abandoned all other environmental issues. He's talked about it a number of times, including at The Heartland Institute's 2022 International Conference on Climate Change.

Expand full comment

Back in 2006-2007, I worked with several such people on their "green projects." I was outraged to learn that it was just trendy business as usual.

I did research and worked in two different fields. The science behind it was completely screwed up.

And the people themselves were ruthless in their dealings with others.

I never completed the project. I said I would never have anything to do with them again.

I have been a vegetarian most of my life. I take care of the planet. These people don't.

https://outraged.substack.com/p/nanotechnology-and-the-new-arms-race

Expand full comment

Great comment. Nothing like actual experience, for sure!

Expand full comment

Indeed basic biology including photosynthesis. It is actually quite simple, plants take in CO2 and give off oxygen. We do the opposite. That said C is better sequestered in the soil that the atmosphere which is exactly why clear cutting is an environmental disaster. The buried tech is a deep rabbit hole, most are unwilling to go down...

Expand full comment

Are you saying that carbon, not carbon dioxide, is better sequestered in soil? If so, then I agree.

I'm enough red pilled, and am even approaching white pilled (which is a surprising place to be, considering how black pilled I've been over the last 3 years, lol), that I'm actually looking forward to finding out what this buried tech is, and why and by whom it's been buried. I don't want to find out about folks killed or destroyed in some other way(s) over this stuff, but I know that's been part of the burial agenda (no pun intended), so it needs to be seen and known. I think I'm ready.

Expand full comment

💬 Powers That Shouldn't Be 🔥

↑↑ a consummate quip has just been shamelessly appropriated without remotely viable course of recourse; deal with it 😝

Expand full comment

It's same strategy as with the c19 vax--don't actually measure whether you fix the problem but instead measure something not peripheral and not connected to solving the problem, i.e., measure antibodies, not better health, and analogously, measure carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and not the health of the soil/air.

Expand full comment

Precisely! Boast about a measure that really doesn't provide any meaningful measure of improvement, and make it sound like it does. Just like they did with the Omicron variant version of the CONvid "vaccine" - testing it on 8 mice, and boasting of "an antibody response" - not THE antibody desired, or needed, but AN antibody response. And, just like during clinical drug trials, in which they almost universally now compare against another drug, not a true placebo - and a drug they are pretty certain will yield worse "results" in whatever measure they tout than the one being tested.

Expand full comment

Indeed, and use useless if not poisonous PCR tests rather than testing for vitamin D deficiency, a true health pandemic.

https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/covid-19-summary/

Expand full comment

Don't buy the Vit D serum tests either. No better than the bad PCR tests. Vit D in the bloodstream is not a true indication of your levels. Vit D pills are really hormones like prednisone and shouldn't be gobbled up in the quantities people seem to think they need because of a blood test. You want Vit D? Stand in the sun or eat animals that did. Avoid all Vit D supplements.

Expand full comment
Apr 6, 2023·edited Apr 6, 2023

Q: Why “The Science” Settled On “Carbon” [wmbriggs.com/post/42510/]

A: The Science settled on “carbon” because it’s easy.

🗨 What controls the climate on earth is not easy. It is the sun, mostly [...]. Second down on the list, but still huge, is water.[...] Third thing is land.[...] Fourth thing is life.[...] Last thing, likely the very last thing of any consequence, something way down on the list, is carbon dioxide.

Of all these things and more, CO2 happens the one *easiest to model*. Not to say said models have any skill to speak of.

--

One more no-nonsense quote ↓↓ to give a taste 🙂

🗨 Experts used to say “carbon dioxide” or “CO2”, as I did above. But that became too burdensome for them. So they shorted it to “carbon.” They all now condemn “carbon”. Which is ludicrous. And it makes them sounds foolish. But that, of course, has never been a stumbling block for Experts.

Expand full comment

I’ve watched a few videos and heard science presentations as carbon is the building block of life. Why I have been puzzled. So another way to think of these demons is they are systematically wanting to get rid of the very life around us, including you and me. Of course carbon would be a fundamental “danger” then. That’s really simplistic on my part, but the big picture as MWD writes is coming into focus more every day.

Expand full comment

Thank you for this. I always wonder why so many people can't figure out the easiest way to reduce CO2 is to reduce humans!

Expand full comment

The 70 years from 1645 to 1715 markedly

period of low activity (Maunder Minimum).

https://livedoor.blogimg.jp/cremony/imgs/f/2/f217b632.jpg The River Thames was frozen in winter.

Food famines also occurred frequently in Japan at that time.

Cold weather hurts plants. A lack of CO2 also hampers plants.

Animals and humans are also tortured by the lack of plants=food.

Climatologists are too narrow-minded. I think that the solar activity and the state of the gas around the sun in the Milky Way should come first.

Expand full comment
Apr 6, 2023·edited Apr 6, 2023

Paleo-climatologists studying Milankovitch cycles are well aware that CO2 and temperature maxima don't correlate well; at some points the stubborn temp fails to respond like at all 😤

And it's not crystal clear which way the purported causality runs in the first place 😏

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

IMHO, this is the most salient and true statement. "Green" is a cult, etc., etc. Well said! As for RFK's receipts on his ability to run.....that's a whole other ball of wax. I initially say, YES! At the very least he will expose the whole vaccine scam and fraud and for that I would be grateful. If he really is a cult leader in the "green" bullshit, that will be front and center for the people to see and judge.

Expand full comment

Yes, cult for the citizens on the left. But for the banking cartel oligarchy that rules over us, it's a cover for setting up a control grid over humanity. They came up with this whole scam at The Club of Rome, one of their elite think tanks.

Expand full comment

I don't know about "way back when," but the WEF supports Climate change with lockdowns. I am disappointed in what you have said. At this time, what our country needs is a bull in a China (get it?) cabinet. That's not who Kennedy is. Our country is crashing fast. We need out of wars and we need our Freedom of Speech back. When we have protected Freedom of Speech, I'll start looking at climate issues.

Expand full comment

This tells you who Kennedy is:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/09/crackpot-rfk-jr-jail-energy-ceos-in-hague-for-treason-punish-climate-deniers-video/

Environmental activist Robert F. Kennedy Jr. lamented that there were no current laws on the books to punish global warming skeptics. . “I wish there were a law you could punish them with. I don’t think there is a law that you can punish those politicians under,” Kennedy told Climate Depot in a one-on-one interview during the People’s Climate March. The interview was conducted for the upcoming documentary Climate Hustle.

Kennedy Jr. accused skeptical politicians of “selling out the public trust.” “Those guys are doing the Koch Brothers bidding and are against all the evidence of the rational mind, saying global warming does not exit. They are contemptible human beings. I wish there were a law you could punish them with. I don’t think there is a law that you can punish those politicians under.”

Kennedy saved his most venomous comments for the Koch Brothers, accusing them of “treason” for “polluting our atmosphere.”

“I think it’s treason. Do I think the Koch Brothers are treasonous, yes I do,” Kennedy explained.

“They are enjoying making themselves billionaires by impoverishing the rest of us. Do I think they should be in jail, I think they should be enjoying three hots and a cot at the Hague with all the other war criminals,” Kennedy declared.

“Do I think the Koch brothers should be tried for reckless endangerment? Absolutely, that is a criminal offence and they ought to be serving time for it,” he added.

Kennedy previously called for jailing his political opponents. Kennedy Jr. lashed out at skeptics of 2007 declaring “This is treason. And we need to start treating them as traitors” In 2009, RFK, Jr. also called coal companies “criminal enterprises” and declared CEO’s ‘should be in jail… for all of eternity.”

Expand full comment

This is the danger of supporting someone based on a single issue. We need better!

Expand full comment

He hasn't said anything quite that strident about climate change deniers lately.

You may not want him to be president, but I think we will all benefit from him being part of the presidential debates. Of course, if it's him and Biden, there will be no debates.

Expand full comment

That was 2014. Is he still saying the same things?

Expand full comment

Got any ideas who you might support? I won’t vote for trump right now. I will vote for nobody then if the same pack of Dems are scrabbling around like a sink full of June bugs (I’ve seen that camping. It’s disgusting .) Third party gets exactly who you don’t want so that’s a non-starter.

Expand full comment

There is no doubt in my mind that we need to vote for Trump. He is pro-life, he will keep us out of wars (that saves the soldiers who die in our wars), we can handle Putin, he'll pull us out of the WHO agreement, WEF, and fake climate woes, lower gas prices again, and I hope get our grocery prices down again. I shop about once every 2-3 weeks and my grocery bill has gone from the high $100s to the low $300s!! I am retired and on a fixed income, so it really hurts.

Expand full comment

Agreed, and I would add that whenever we hear of some "crisis" we should start sniffing around for an agneda.

Expand full comment

There is a proven link, when there is warming it causes and increase in atmospheric CO2, was the seas and oceans release a little of the CO2 sequestered in their waters. There no proof that caues warming, and more likely that the increase it causes in vegetation would have a cooling effect.

Expand full comment

Neither the Swedish hysteria girl nor the climatologists have considered the complexities you describe.

Expand full comment

OK let's just say that the figure "97% of scientists agree with global warming theory" is false. Let's just say it's 50%, to make sure we factor in all the possible reasons for such smart people to be hoodwinked (research money, etc.). So lets say it is 50-50 split among experts that we might be destroying the future livability of the Earth as in the IPCC predictions. What dumbass wants to wager on this bet? How do you sleep knowing that you're possibly putting at risk not some future generation but the next generation your kids or grandkids? - is it really your expertise with the science or just because of your lack of humility and greed? And, agreeing partly with the MW doctor and many of you, what dumb ass can't see that the things we need to do to reduce global warming are all necessary anyway to slow the UNDENIABLE destruction of EVERY major ecosystem on earth and the rapid depletion of resources needed to sustain any quality of life for future generations. And I don't buy into liberal arguments, that we can maintain our quality of life by introducing new technologies (which as we now know, come with their own environmental costs) to save us or with conservative/libertarian arguments that unrestrained capitalism is the only way forward (thinking very limited to the USofA). Both the left and the right are unwilling to go beyond their arrogance, greed, and lack of humility. Whether or not climate change is happening, we must reduce our destructive lifestyles and reign in on corporate and military misuse of resources and destruction of environments…. The primary goal towards both ecological stability and climate security has to be reduction in materialism and consumerism, and the most decadent US needs to set the example. The debate over climate change is just allowing the festering of the greed disease - Rome is burning and the world is going down with it.

Expand full comment

I 100% agree with your assessment.

Expand full comment

A very good summary, thank you. It could do with paragraphing though for more impact.

Expand full comment

Respectfully, I’d like to see your evidence that predicted temperature increases have not materialized.

There is overwhelming evidence that models have been remarkably accurate in the past decades in predicting average temperature increases.

See https://eps.harvard.edu/files/eps/files/hausfather_2020_evaluating_historical_gmst_projections.pdf for one such analysis.

If anything, scientists have underestimated the extreme temperatures we are experiencing now even as they have been accurate in projecting average worldwide temperature increases.

Expand full comment
Apr 7, 2023·edited Apr 7, 2023

Modeling is close to the worst method of science. Remember, modeling was one the first things used to spread fear and panic of Covid.

But, that's not the important thing. I want to know who decided that the temperature/climate right now is optimal. It's been much warmer and much cooler in the past. Life flourished when it was warmer. It nearly died off when it was much cooler. If we must err on the side of caution, warmer is objectively better.

Expand full comment

Thank you. Genuinely.

Expand full comment

Although I hope the Doc does address "global warming", I'm going to here briefly. There is no global warming. We've been cooling since around 2014, and this is shown in NASA satellite data. It only APPEARS that we're warming, because many temperature stations are located in heat sinks, and thus are registering too hot. Heat sinks are areas that hold heat from the sun shining on them during the day and re-radiate that heat out during the night, and thus are warmer both day and night than surrounding non-heat sink areas. Many temperature stations were originally located in non-heat sink spots, but are now in heat sinks because of urban growth - buildings built next to them, being encompassed within sidewalks or parking lots, etc. Some have even been located or relocated onto the tops or sides of buildings! When these stations are removed from data sets, there is no warming, just the slight cooling as confirmed by NASA satellite data.

Also, carbon dioxide, CO2, is NOT a "pollutant"... It is literally plant food - it's pumped into greenhouses specifically to help the plants grow faster and larger, and the crops they produce grow faster and larger. We're at one of the lowest CO2 levels ever recorded - around 400 ppm. If we get to around 180 or so, plants die because they starve to death! As plants grow more slowly in cooler temperatures, and we're cooling, we actually need MORE CO2, not less.

Yes, I'm a Geoscientist.

Expand full comment

Amen! Sanity. CO2 is very important for green things growing. And green growing things are? The LUNGS of the PLANET! Since we are busy deforesting everything in sight (hello Amazon Basin) we are in a bad way well on the road to BladeRunner level world...

Expand full comment
Apr 6, 2023·edited Apr 6, 2023

Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant and neither is it responsible for warming, not now and not ever. On all measurable timescales CO2 concentrations follow temperature, a consequence of Henry's Law. Anthropogenic contributions of carbon dioxide are tiny and have no effect on the climate apart from a measured greening of the planet which contributes to the enrichment of food crops. The planet is always warming or cooling. And for the last 8k years since the Optimum, it has cooled following a trend present in every interglacial of this age. It is cooler and there is more ice on the planet now that at any time in the last 8k years except for the LIA, the coldest period since the LGM. 5k years ago we entered a Neo-glacial period. It was warmer during both RWP and MWP, and each preceding interglacial before ours was warmer than the Holocene. Changes in cloud cover albedo explain warming / cooling on decadal timescales, not CO2. Lastly, contrary to what the IPCC and climate scientology will tell you, the thermal effect of the atmosphere is not radiative, but adiabatic, a function of insolation, atmospheric mass and the acceleration due to gravity, which is obvious from comparisons with other planets with differing concentrations of IR-absorbing gases as well as temperature-pressure level comparisons (pV=nRT). The people who want a needle in every arm and who are grooming your children and cutting off their body parts are the same people pushing the climate emergency. It is a scam and all about control, another road to tyranny. These people are Marxists not environmentalists, and they are lying to you. Don't fall for it.

Expand full comment

Yes!!!!! Thank you!!! Please keep posting that all over the internet (especially all over substack!!)

Expand full comment

Is there one book you can recommend on the topic? Thank you.

Expand full comment

Does the majority of geoscientists secretly share your stance, or have they been successfully brainwashed?

Expand full comment
Apr 6, 2023·edited Apr 6, 2023

I can't tell if you're being sarcastic, or is this is a serious question. Care to specify?

Expand full comment

Sarcastic? We're constantly being told that geoscientists support the current narrative. I have yet to meet a geoscientist in real life. I assumed you knew a few.

Expand full comment

SEG has been cowed, the membership much less so.

Expand full comment

I left the SEG because they would not address the censorship, perversion and suppression of science - it was covid as you may imagine! Safe & effective if you shrink your gonads and stay under a rock.

Expand full comment

Similarly SEG will not discuss climate science outside the official narrative; used to be taboo on LinkedIn too but recently lots of dissent appears there and the suppression of comments has eased.

Expand full comment

There is no climate crisis. There is bad "science" in the fake climate crisis field. There is pollution of many different types. There is bad land management that is ignored. There is bad water management that is ignored. Both all in the name of the all mighty dollar going into pockets of people in the government. Read the reports/studies by the real experts. You're going to have to look somewhere besides gargle. (No, I don't keep links.)

Expand full comment

Crisis?

The experiences of the last 3 years should have had the effect of educating everyone about how "crises" originate and who benefits. We should all have learned how much criminality exists in high places and how "authorities" function.

Expand full comment

Yes, orchestrated by the ruling elite psychopaths (banking cartel/central bankers)--the came up with the global warming scam (renamed climate change when it stopped warming) at the Club of Rome, one of their elite think tanks. The whole reason for is to serve as justification for the digital control grid/slave grid that they are building for us. They want us to have digital ID and CBDCs and social credit scores connected to our carbon footprint. And they will use the hoax as justification for locking us down.

Expand full comment

All true. Why can't everyone see that? The big game plan has been clear for over a century.

McFadden, Lindbergh and LaFollette to name just a few spoke out about it yet here we are!

From 1932.:

"Mr. Chairman, when the Federal Reserve act was passed, the people of the United States did not perceive that a world system was being set up here which would make the savings of an American school-teacher available to a narcotic-drug vendor in Macao. They did not perceive that the United States were to be lowered to the position of a coolie country which has nothing but raw materials and heavy goods for export; that Russia was destined to supply the man power and that this country was to supply financial power to an international superstate -- a superstate controlled by international bankers and international industrialists acting together to enslave the world for their own pleasure.

-Louis T. McFadden's Speech In the House of Representatives 10 June 1932

Louis T. McFadden's U.S. House Speech,10 June 1932 (afn.org)

Expand full comment

I'd like to point out that he said that in 1932.

1933 was the year that FDR granted official recognition to the USSR, (which advocated worldwide revolution) and which was formed with the help of money from the Marxist, Bolshevist sympathizing international financial elite (as was Mao).

To this day people smear the "Nazis," but Hitler was just coming into power in 1933 and gained support as an anti-Communist. I hope everyone can connect the dots.

Expand full comment

Most people have never even heard of Congressman Louis McFadden. How sad is that? And I often drop this link, but nobody seems interested:

https://www.winterwatch.net/2023/02/the-assassination-of-louis-mcfadden-one-of-the-20th-centurys-most-prescient-men/

They've also never heard of Senator Nye:

https://www.winterwatch.net/2023/02/wheres-gerald-nye-when-we-need-him-nye-committees-1936-report-on-banksters-arms-dealers-warmongering-2/

Expand full comment

The risk of global warming is as real are Dolly Partons blossoms. Even if the Sun did a micro nova (that has far more credibility than the claim Co2 is causing dangerous warming) there would be a deadly short term scorching on one side before Earth was thrown into a freezing period.

The whole fraud is about throwing the West into abject poverty.

Expand full comment

There is a pollution crisis, not a climate crisis. The environment is heavily polluted by all sorts of Nazi chemicals and the landscape and habitats are seriously degraded by toxins and other actions.

However there is a climate of fear and stupidity.

Expand full comment

Crisis?

The past 3 years should have firmly educated everyone where "crises" originate and who benefits.

Expand full comment

Yes some of us know it is a giant pre fabricated hoax. You have been hoodwinked.

When I first previewed Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth" I knew within minutes that Gore was lying. It has only gotten much much worse. This is not to give a pass for the corporate demon destroying the ecosystem, anything but...

Expand full comment

Global warming/climate change alarmism is a money making scheme. Stop deluding yourself. It’s a natural occurrence. We humans are not in charge!!!

Expand full comment

The $3 billion that the richest industry in world history makes every day fossil fuel companies that’s not a money making scheme? So I assume you will not be supporting RFK Jr since he has been a strong and consistent supporter of the best science and the best evidence, which is why he questions vaccine efficacy, and why he 100% supports acting on the climate crisis.

Expand full comment

Global warming is no longer used. The term for the hoax now is climate change.

Expand full comment

No scientific proof just more lies, kind of like safe and effective?????

Expand full comment

And as I’m sure, you know, RFK,JR is an outspoken supporter of the green new deal, aggressive climate action, and the need to retire fossil fuels. Which is one of the reasons I am excited to see him run.

Expand full comment

And it’s one of the reasons why I will NEVER vote for him.

I have no desire to live in the 17th century.

Expand full comment

I agree 100%

This green agenda is also cover for global genocide (those Malthusians want to rid their planet of us useless eaters). There's no way to sustain a modern economy of 8 billion people on windmills and solar panels. And green is hardly green, if you no what I mean.

Expand full comment

Exactly why I could never vote for him. I worked environmental sciences for too long to give up on how far we've come with pollution to give up on moving the pollution scale downward now. All the wonderful new "non-polluting" things they are creating will kill off more trees, land/soil, and animals with the pollution from the rare earth minerals/metals than ever before seen. That's a huge problem.

I'm very sorry to see so many wanting to kill off the planet I've worked my whole adult life to save, because they've been brainwashed like many have been about the clot shots.

Expand full comment

Yes, it's just mass brainwashing. Yes, all their new "non-polluting"/good for the environment projects are killing off plants and animals. My parents have lived in NJ for 49 years and dead whales never washed up on the beaches, but now that they are setting up their windmills off shore, lots of dead whales are washing up. And interestingly, these people who claim to care about the environment are fine with killing the whales. Didn't they used to want to save the whales?

Expand full comment

I just read about all the dead whales, and why, just the other day. It made me cry.

Expand full comment

Can't wait for that. I for one don't care how long your articles are. I relish reading them.

Expand full comment

Until some of the climate change advocates actually examine & seek to understand data around issues like sunspot activity, it is hard to take them seriously. As someone who grew up as an active outdoorsman & was a Sierra Club member for years until I realized their underlying politics, we really have no HONEST environmental advocacy at a 'systems' level. It is just a political tool with uninformed loonies making absurd claims.

As I grew up with VietNam hanging over my head (to which I was always strongly opposed) I struggled with the neocon stuff. With the assassination attempt on Reagan, it appeared that things began to change. I have always assumed that the shooting was used to leverage far more power for Bush & his buds. Then we get Clinton, a friend of Bush from CIA - Mena, AR days. And on it goes.

Your political diagram is interesting and fairly accurate. None of the politicians remotely represent me (and come on, it is impossible to have representative government for 300 million people), and other than Johnson, Paul, & DeSantis the Repubs are little better than the Dems.

Could RFK be elected? That is actually the final answer to whether voting actually matters. I have maintained that it really hasn't mattered for years, the system is controlled. I truly worry that Bobby Jr. will face attacks in the press AND in person that would require massive efforts to address.

He is a shining ray of light - We shall see, I truly hope he is the next Dem candidate. Repub: Somebody needs to explain to the Donald that he had his chance and made too many boneheaded choices in his appointees, he trusted the wrong people, and changed his tune between campaign and election on certain things (most notably: "this economy is fake, this growth is simply based on debt" as a candidate to "this is the greatest economy in history" when it was STILL based on expansion of Fed balance sheets. Whether DeSantis is ready for prime time remains to be seen.

Expand full comment

Spot on Doc.

Nebulous targets reminds me of all those wars: Afghanistan-Iraq-Syria; terrorism; drugs; poverty...

... not notable for many grand successes this list and I'm afraid the avoidable war in Europe is similarly headed only toward more war.

Come back George Orwell, all is forgiven.

Expand full comment

💬 a nebulous target that could never be met

↑↑ These are the best by far, bar none: whatever transpires, you can always smugly pronounce ‘I told you so!’ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Expand full comment

Definitely This. You might also want to look into Global BEM and a movie called Polarity that describes some of Viktor Schauberger's work near the end.

Expand full comment

Your belief that energy tech has existed for decades is certainly true. Global warming is being pushed more since the Covid debacle and the deliberate genocide. That is anything but a coincidence. Not making the case for oil, as it is horribly polluting, although it is anything but scare and not a "fossil fuel" Climate Change is mostly a farce...

Expand full comment

the worst I have seen so far is someone who cleans out cans, even in the dishwasher, and then buys plastic cups to clean their teeth.

Expand full comment

I would like to see how your clean energy articles compare to mine (mostly utilising Simon Michaux as my source)

Expand full comment

You aren't addressing a key show-stopper for many of us: his fervid support of the pseudoscience of CO2 catastrophe.

Expand full comment
author

see my comment above you.

Expand full comment

Then you're contradicting yourself if you believe that someone promoting CO2 pseudoscience would make a good president. That someone would simply further the narrative and play right into the hands of the WEF.

CO2 catastrophe underlies the Great Reset. Surely you understand that. This theory must not be supported. It must be dismantled.

Expand full comment

Yes, a key agenda of the Great Reset is the climate change hoax--its just a cover for genocide and building a control grid around humanity.

Expand full comment
Apr 6, 2023·edited Apr 6, 2023

Yes!! His continued support of the pseudoscience of the climate change hoax is a deal breaker for me.

And what's also concerning is that even with the climate change hoax being a key component of the Great Reset, he still hasn't changed his stance or questioned whether he could have been misled, which for me is a problem.

I look to Professor Mark Crispin Miller, who used to be a fervent supporter of the climate change scam, but has since change his stance in light of new information. He has been open to looking at weather weapons as being the cause of the bizarre fires out in CA, as well as other extreme weather. Yet, I don't see any change in stance from RFK. So, I know it's an unpopular view here, but I see him as controlled opposition. Though it's also possible that he's extremely brainwashed--I know early on in operation covid hoax, when the Great Reset had been announced, he was on a zoom meeting with Catherine Austin Fitts and others and seemed utterly clueless that the ruling elite have think tanks and yes, do in fact meet and plot---apparently, he didn't notice that the WEF/World Enslavement Forum/Davos was exactly that. He also doesn't appear to have any understanding of the Federal Reserve--on maybe a different zoom call he was bothered that the states couldn't print money like the federal govt (no awareness that this is inflationary and a wealth extraction mechanism).

Expand full comment

Makes no sense that people are torn between Trump & RFK. Trump was easily the #1 pro-vaccine, pro-Pharma president in US history (until Biden, that is). Trump gave billions to GAVI, Trump appointed Pfizer insiders to his cabinet, Trump gave Pharma endless checks for new vaccine development (this was well before Covid), Trump continues to brag about Operation Warp Speed. Sure he talked a good game prior to getting elected, but he quickly threw us all under the bus.

Expand full comment

Needed to be said. Trump didn’t buy into the covid hoax at all - but when the media and scientists started bleating about the need for a vaccine, he saw his opportunity for more fame and clout. Creator of World curing vaccine! In unguarded moments he doesn’t believe in the Rona and vax at all.

Expand full comment

Yes, this ☝️

Expand full comment

So what? It is still your choice to take the Clot shot or not! When Politicians raise taxes and punish us with more regulations.........WE HAVE NO CHOICE!!!

Expand full comment

I haven’t read down the comments yet, so if this is addressed later I apologize...but, how sure are we that IF RFK Jr were to win the presidency that he wouldn’t receive the exact same outsider (Non-Swamp New World Order) treatment and attempt at takedown the Trump has been fighting for 6+ years now?

Expand full comment
author

He would but:

•he could likely mobilize the public to support him

•he will not have a confrontational campaign style, which prevents a lot of the hostility Trump received.

Expand full comment

I can promise you that no Trump supporter will vote for anyone but current President Trump. Trump is the ultimate fighter and the only one who can take down the Deep State. I, for one, would NEVER vote for a democrat, no matter who they were. Unless, of course, the dem party abandons all the foolishness of woke bullshit, taking away guns, pitting right against left, destroying the dem run cities and states, leaving the borders wide open, etc. Vaxxines are important and President Trump will get rid of them all, I believe. The other main issue is all the voter fraud perpetrated by the dem party. This has been their claim to fame for decades. We must switch to a single paper ballot, counted by the military with no computers. I don’t see the dem party doing this. Btw, Trump is the President now and will remain so.

Expand full comment

Being utterly entrenched in ideology is exactly how we got here... and became so divided. Not the entire reason, but a big part of it. So, you're gonna continue w/ yours no matter what information is presented to you, no matter what happens?

BTW, I imagine you won't want to believe this, but there really aren't "Democrats" and "Republicans"... There's only the Uniparty and a few, very few, Patriots. Those who don't mind being labelled as "Democrat" are fine with being very in our faces w/ the radical agenda. Those who don't mind being labelled as "Republican" are fine with pretending to push back against the radical agenda, yet just enough of them vote for it that it passes, or it passes the next term. Think about it, check DC folks' actual voting records - the radical agenda ALWAYS advances, no matter who's in the big chair, no matter which party is "in power", etc. A lot of the time in the past, the agenda has been more subdued, but now it's in our faces all the time. That's because they're desperate to get it all in place that they're rushing.

Expand full comment

Fine comment there!

"There's only the Uniparty and a few, very few, Patriots. "

True.

Helen Keller was both blind and deaf yet she knew the score.

“Are not the dominant parties managed by the ruling classes, that is, the propertied classes, solely for the profit and privilege of the few?

They use us millions to help them into power. They tell us like so many children that our safety lies in voting for them. They toss us crumbs of concession to make us believe that they are working in our interest. “

-Helen Keller,OUT OF THE DARK, LETTER TO AN ENGLISH WOMAN- SUFFRAGIST* Copyright, 1907

http://archive.org/stream/outdarkessaysle01kellgoog/outdarkessaysle01kellgoog_djvu.txt

The whole thing is worth a read. Chock full of verities about politics.

Expand full comment

“Two wings of the same vulture. The RNC wants money. The DNC wants power. The RNC uses power to get money. The DNC uses money to get power. The donor activity of the RNC drives their ideology. The ideology of the DNC drives their donor activity. This is the essential difference in the business models of both wings.”

This came from a pro-Trump website whose other content I could hardly bear to look at, but I think it's an excellent observation.

Expand full comment

Sorry, the military can't be trusted at this point. Tooo woke. I don't want them counting anything.

Expand full comment

The miliary exists primarliy to enforce the plans of the globalist bankers and the will of the bankers now is to toss the US under the bus because there are bigger opportunites elsewhere (follow da munny). Also, we've done a lot of their dirty work for them and are about played out for various reasons and therefore expendable. Which is part of the reason it's being rotted from within.

Then there's this.:

"This is usually the case with all armies or detachments from them… to feel their strength sufficient to indulge that military tyranny which grows by habit, and makes a standing army a fit instrument for the support of the most cruel despotism."

-Mercy Otis Warren, History of the Rise, Progress, and Termination of the American Revolution interspersed with Biographical, Political and Moral Observations, in Two Volumes, Foreword by Lester H. Cohen (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund 1994). 2/3/2018.

http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/696#Warren_0025-02_1005

Expand full comment

As far as I could tell, Trump never changed the Deep State. I fact, i cannot recall anything in particular he did, other than play golf and bluster.

Expand full comment

Susan, I could go on a litany of his accomplishments; however, they would fall on deaf ears, so I'll say a few things. Energy independence, Low gas prices, low inflation, he started NO wars and appointed Conservative Constitutional Supreme Court Judges!

P.S. He was in the middle of Making America Great Again, and now Brandon is giving our country and freedom away to the NWO, a Tyrannical World Government!!!

Expand full comment

I agree with some of those things, but not others. His judicial appointments, for one, have been very mixed, as he was getting his recommendations from a lot of Deep State actors and RINOs.

Expand full comment

Still, it'd be hard to deny that he hardly defied the Deep State. Shame on him; he was mostly bluster.

Expand full comment

Are you for real?!?!?!?!?!? READ.........................

President Donald J. Trump's Accomplishments List:

https://www.magapill.com/

Expand full comment
deletedApr 6, 2023·edited Apr 6, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Trump is not talking about the MRNA that he gave us via Operation Warp Speed, the murderous policies of the bureaucracy, nor is he telling us how he will end the biosecurity state. His refusal to make this a key issue is prohibiting the Trump MAGA crusaders from talking about it either. If Trump is the candidate we lose this most important issue, and the possibility for Nuremberg 2 is gone. We need someone like Kennedy to make this issue front and center. Kennedy's entry into the race is Trump's opportunity to take this issue on now. He must. PS: I have not voted for a Democrat at any level since the 1970's. One exception I made a strategic vote for Bernie Sanders in the NH Primary.

Expand full comment

Uhhh, no, we don’t need the MILITARY counting our ballots. The MILITARY is how we needed up, apparently, with bioweapons like C and the injections.

We The People are fully capable of counting our ballots. Missouri, at least in some counties, is doing this.

Expand full comment

This is where you are so wrong. Confrontational style is what this country needs! Not kid gloves. WE need a fighter, a brawler. Good Luck.

Expand full comment

I'm not so sure... They're doing everything they can to goad us into becoming violent, or to actions they can claim are violent - and then Xiden (Biden) can call Martial Law. I wonder if someone with a less confrontational style would be good w/r to campaigning, and getting needed messages across. And then, once in office, take the gloves off... ???

Expand full comment

Right on!

Expand full comment

Well, if you mean that we should confront the global banking mafia that owns and runs the place, then you may have something there. Otherwise, our confrontational (belligerent and aggressive) style has not served us, (as in we da peeple), too well in my view though it has served the ruling jerks quite well.

Expand full comment

Dr., Why are you doing this? And at this time? I'm serious.

You're swayed by a President's manners?? It was Trump's "campaign style" and personality that propelled him to victory. He doesn't care what people think. We MAGA middle class LIKE his campaign style and we LIKE what he says and stands for, because he helps us.

I will take "mean tweets" with "a fierce determination to never give up" any old day, if it means getting our country back on the right track again, stopping baby killers, pedophilia, Satanic worship, wars, and sky high cost of living.

We must get Free Speech back. We must get rid of the Deep State. We need a "bull in a China cabinet." (Get it?) No one but Trump will be able to crush the Deep State. We don't need a Neville Chamberlain. We need a CHURCHILL.

Expand full comment

Well said!!!

Expand full comment

Hey, Trump's confrontational style is what's worrying you? Mean tweets? Man, our whole country's truly going under. Our free speech rights, we're afraid to protest, search and seizure, arrest on lawns guns pointing at your children? Are you kidding? That's exactly why we need Trump!

Expand full comment

Dear MW Doc, I laughed a lot with your first graph but it has a mistake: the right has also BEEN shifted to the left (for example, think about "gay pride" and same-sex marriage, compulsory taught with Comprehensive Sexuality Education brainwashing generations ... look at StopCSE.com ).

What you and RFK don't get is that the system is rigged: it was created by masons (French and American Revolutions) for the masons: think about it... if masons infiltrate and control both parties, there's no democracy, just a uniparty as Tucker Carlson likes to remind us.

Guess who started the Ukraine war in 2014: mason Obama. Not a Neocon project but a mason Pearl Harbor event: rigged for the fall of Putin, who was against the mason New World Order. Check who funded the 30 biowar labs in Ukraine: the NIH? no, the masons there... under mason Fauci!

Think about Trump: probably half of his cabinet were masons. Not to mention the masons controlling the administration (Fauci, Collins, etc.). He was surrounded! Not much he could do!

The mason press, mainstream media is set to destroy any original idea.

One example: the Government spends 3000 million on abortion per year (most, funding Planned Parenthood). Trump only slashed 60 million: he didn't have what it takes to confront the administration, risking impeachment and jail to save the lives of all those babies.

RFK is great... but he still believes de decarb hoax and I'm not sure if he's prolife, the ultimate touchstone for integrity.

Green communism sucked 200 trillion from taxpayers:

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/best-scientific-sources-to-debunk

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/killing-me-softly-with-green-songs

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/carbon-reparations

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/climate-deaths

It’s the masons, dummy!

In 1921, the Council on Foreign Relations was founded, to infiltrate and control democracy, by freemasons David Rockefeller, Paul Warburg, Herbert Hoover, Allen Dulles, Walter Lippmann and Edward M. House. The impressive 10-thousand members list proves the power grab was successful.1 Since 1921, the CFR has chosen every single Secretary of State. Similar mason institutions, most with similar names, were founded in over 100 countries, including Britain's Royal Institute of International Affairs and the European Council on Foreign Relations2: practically, there’s no war where the CFR isn’t involved on both sides. 3 Their magazine Foreign Affairs is one way they send orders to all members.

In 2018, Wikileaks proved the CFR controlled all mainstream media.4

Hoover, Truman, Eisenhower, Bush father and son, Carter, Clinton, Obama 5 ... some argue that, with few exceptions like JFK and Trump, at least since WWII, all US presidents were freemasons and many CFR. All administrations were filled with thousands of CFR members. 6 The Trump administration was no exception. 7 It’s not a coincidence that Neil M. Gorsuch, CFR Supreme Court Justice appointed by Trump, betrayed conservatives by ruling in favour of homosexual marriage and other New World Order “progressive” agenda.

Another proof of grooming for infiltration: 28 Jun 2019 Democrat Tulsi Gabbard wasn’t renewed 5 CFR year membership. 8 Because she wouldn’t obey all orders? In 2020, she was still pro-homo-marriage9 and pro-abortion (a basic CFR request) and pro-Biden, but wanted paper ballots, Electoral College, supported Trump in breaking up Big Tech and removing their censorship through section 23010, Glass-Steagall, pro-natalism paid family and medical leave plans up to 12 weeks, less public and defense spending, drug patent breaking, no war.11 That’s probably why she was defamed by Kamala12, Hillary Clinton and mason Mitt Romney.13 In 2021, she questioned Fauci on COVID origin and masks.14 Tulsi was groomed by WEF in the "Forum of Young Global Leaders" but suddenly was disappeared, and not because she turned 38 (41 in 2023), the WEF cut-off limit for “young”, freemason Macron (45) is still in the search results. Fremason Trudeau, 51, isn’t, but is listed in weforum.org15, while Tulsi has been erased from there, in Apr 2022 (she independized from the Democratic party in Oct 2022).16 Maybe this was the drop that filled the cup: she’s against CBDCs and social scoring.17

https://www.younggloballeaders.org/community

The CFR is just a small piece of a large puzzle of thousands of organizations, for example:

9-11: 2 planes, all 7 WTC towers down, but not the closest non-WTC !

What’s the chance of this?: 11 Sep 1991, exactly a decade before 9-11 (2001), George Bush (father) said “What is at stake, is more than one small country - it is a big idea - a New World Order where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause... to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind - peace and security, freedom and the rule of law.. out of these humble times, our fifth objective - the New World Order - can emerge, [and] now we can see a new world coming into view. A world in which there is a very real prospect of a New World Order…” 18

September, 2000, one year before 9/11, Neo-Con think tank, “Project for the New American Century” (PNAC) 19 sustained: “the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.” PNAC members included Bush Administration insiders such as Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Libby and Perle.” 20

More here:

The 2020 and 2022 rigged and stolen elections (it’s the machines!):

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-2020-american-coup

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/david-rockefeller-illuminati

J6: what THEY don't want YOU to know

The fake riot was mason-planned, incited and guided by FBI agents, who broke into the Capitol !!!

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/j6-what-you-need-to-know

Are we crazy to accept demo-crazy?

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/democracy-democrazy

It sucks! We need to improve democracy… how about REAL democracy?

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/reinventing-democracy

The full PLAN exposed:

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-plan-revealed

Gates-WHO depop vaccines:

Proof: it was never for health and reduced mortality, only for infertilizing, handicapping and murdering!

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/depop-vaccines-no-myth

The threat of the WHO sovereignty-grab by the IHR and International PLANdemc Treaty:

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-threat-of-the-international-plandemic

Expand full comment

I worry in his efforts to win over the left, he’ll disarm law abiding Americans, among other sacrificial lambs-- throw the baby out with the bath water so to speak. We shall see.

Expand full comment

They kill Kennedys.

Expand full comment
Apr 6, 2023·edited Apr 6, 2023

At this point it seems they kill whoever they want to. It also feels as if the biopharmaceutical industrial complex, the global predators, the deep state, the cabal - whatever the powers that be pushing this upon the world - is unrelentingly powerful. I don't think the 2020 election coincidentally resulted in a person in the white house who hissed at Americans to "get vaccinated", set mandates for federal workers and attempted to force mandates on private employers with 100 or more enployees. Nor do I think it is a coincidence that he is feeble minded, likely has corrupt ties to China, and is also likely to be steered and controlled by others behind the scenes. The covid debacle required that. Even though Trump now sounds like a boastful idiot clueless about the personal health disasters caused for so many by the OWS miracle injections he takes credit for, he had to be taken out of office; he was too unpredictable, too independent, and far too powerful for the plandemic to work as well as it did under hapless Biden. The 2024 race has already proven it will be ugly, and anyone in the arena who is NOT a friend to pharma better be tough as nails because they will be targeted for destruction just as all the brave doctors speaking truth have been. I believe RFK jr has solid integrity on covid issues. Can he endure the flogging he will get?

Expand full comment

TPTB may be more desperate than "powerful" at this point, with their COVID and Ukraine-War control-narratives weakening and backfiring on them.. The $US global curency game, supported by the threat of getting what Libya and Iraq got, is also being broadly bypassed by China, Russia, India, Turkey, Iran, and even Saudi Arabia.

Bobby Jr. has what it takes to negotiate for American citizens, which Joe Biden (listening to Barack Obama earpiece) can't do.

When will the "owners" actually capitulate? They must lose hope for regaining the control they knew under Bush/Obama. It is over, and they can just keep losing by cinging to what is aready gone.The owners also cant agree. Some might accept Kennedy or Trump, while others woud assassinate them.

Why do I clump Kennedy and Trump (bad manners, I know)?

They are both independent executives, who seek inputs, but are not controlled.

Expand full comment

I would consider it a win for America if RFK Jr can manage to get the Dem nomination. Trump or Kennedy, either way America wins.

Expand full comment

Good question, and reasoning. However, I'm not completely sold on Trump anymore. For one, he was in property development in NYC for decades... there is no way that there's no dirt in his past, absolutely no way. Which means he's either paid handsomely for others' silence, or has dirt on them so they keep silent. Either way, it means he's not really as truly patriotic as so many of us would like to believe. His being in the big chair was good for business, no doubt, and keeping energy plentiful and cheap - but that was good for business, too. His continuing to push the CONvid jab until relatively recently also does not bode well. He was booed at rallies for it, and kept doing it! So, his only recently changing directions on that is POLITICAL - whether it was he or his advisors, it was decided that DeSantis was gaining ground politically because he was appearing to start going after Big Pharma - although, note that nothing's come of that so far. So BOTH men leave a lot to be desired w/r to leadership over the people, and not business.

Expand full comment

Rick, You must remember that he's a Kennedy! Trump had an advantage with his name when he ran in 2016; however, the Kennedy name is a political ICONIC name and has been for over six decades. If Trump is a shoo-in in the Republican primaries, I will switch parties and vote for RFK in the Florida primaries!

I believe there are more Liberals than Leftist/Socialist voters in the Democrat party, but that slight lead drops in each subsequent election. However, when the facts come out, I think many of the WOKE will wake up from their altered reality and learn that their leaders have duped them!

With their cancel culture, most of the Democrats will be shocked when they hear the FACTS for likely the first time in years of what is really happening, not the false narratives they have been bombarded with for decades and more so over the last seven years.

Expand full comment

I think it is a terrific decision that will help America get back on the right track. Win or lose the American people will be educated, because RFK Junior will not play the dirty game.!

Expand full comment

I like the idea of voting for him in the primaries. He needs to be up front and center on the VAxx, bioweapons and run on this issue. Debate Trump on it. Would be awesome!

Expand full comment

I'm here in Commifornia. My vote wouldn't count voting Republican in the primaries and would like to see Bydone bumped out of the picture. Never voted for a Dem but if I can here in the primaries would vote for JFK Jr.

Expand full comment

"Regardless of who wins the election, RFK will still be able to make a massive impact on the vaccine issue prior to when voting begins because he will force the topic into the public discourse."

This!

Maybe it's because I live in a very liberal community, but everybody around me has absolutely no concerns about vaccine safety. At the very most they will admit that the vaccines haven't appeared to do a whole lot of good.

Expand full comment

The climate scam is every bit as much a threat as vaccination; perhaps moreso. The New Tyrants are also a threat. RFKjr appears to be both.

Expand full comment

Yep, Climate Change is 100% BS!!!

August 19, 2022

Global warming is the greatest scientific fraud in history

By Guy K. Mitchell, Jr.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/08/global_warming_is_the_greatest_scientific_fraud_in_history.html

Expand full comment

If anyone can even think, they are in control of the world climate, they don't know the power of God!

Expand full comment

For the soros team the question is, whose assassination will benefit us most?

Expand full comment

Dear MW Doc, I laughed a lot with your first graph but it has a mistake: the right has also BEEN shifted to the left (for example, think about "gay pride" and same-sex marriage, compulsory taught with Comprehensive Sexuality Education brainwashing generations ... look at StopCSE.com ).

What you and RFK don't get is that the system is rigged: it was created by masons (French and American Revolutions) for the masons: think about it... if masons infiltrate and control both parties, there's no democracy, just a uniparty as Tucker Carlson likes to remind us.

Guess who started the Ukraine war in 2014: mason Obama. Not a Neocon project but a mason Pearl Harbor event: rigged for the fall of Putin, who was against the mason New World Order. Check who funded the 30 biowar labs in Ukraine: the NIH? no, the masons there... under mason Fauci!

Think about Trump: probably half of his cabinet were masons. Not to mention the masons controlling the administration (Fauci, Collins, etc.). He was surrounded! Not much he could do!

The mason press, mainstream media is set to destroy any original idea.

One example: the Government spends 3000 million on abortion per year (most, funding Planned Parenthood). Trump only slashed 60 million: he didn't have what it takes to confront the administration, risking impeachment and jail to save the lives of all those babies.

RFK is great... but he still believes de decarb hoax and I'm not sure if he's prolife, the ultimate touchstone for integrity.

It’s the masons, dummy!

In 1921, the Council on Foreign Relations was founded, to infiltrate and control democracy, by freemasons David Rockefeller, Paul Warburg, Herbert Hoover, Allen Dulles, Walter Lippmann and Edward M. House. The impressive 10-thousand members list proves the power grab was successful.1 Since 1921, the CFR has chosen every single Secretary of State. Similar mason institutions, most with similar names, were founded in over 100 countries, including Britain's Royal Institute of International Affairs and the European Council on Foreign Relations2: practically, there’s no war where the CFR isn’t involved on both sides. 3 Their magazine Foreign Affairs is one way they send orders to all members.

In 2018, Wikileaks proved the CFR controlled all mainstream media.4

Hoover, Truman, Eisenhower, Bush father and son, Carter, Clinton, Obama 5 ... some argue that, with few exceptions like JFK and Trump, at least since WWII, all US presidents were freemasons and many CFR. All administrations were filled with thousands of CFR members. 6 The Trump administration was no exception. 7 It’s not a coincidence that Neil M. Gorsuch, CFR Supreme Court Justice appointed by Trump, betrayed conservatives by ruling in favour of homosexual marriage and other New World Order “progressive” agenda.

Another proof of grooming for infiltration: 28 Jun 2019 Democrat Tulsi Gabbard wasn’t renewed 5 CFR year membership. 8 Because she wouldn’t obey all orders? In 2020, she was still pro-homo-marriage9 and pro-abortion (a basic CFR request) and pro-Biden, but wanted paper ballots, Electoral College, supported Trump in breaking up Big Tech and removing their censorship through section 23010, Glass-Steagall, pro-natalism paid family and medical leave plans up to 12 weeks, less public and defense spending, drug patent breaking, no war.11 That’s probably why she was defamed by Kamala12, Hillary Clinton and mason Mitt Romney.13 In 2021, she questioned Fauci on COVID origin and masks.14 Tulsi was groomed by WEF in the "Forum of Young Global Leaders" but suddenly was disappeared, and not because she turned 38 (41 in 2023), the WEF cut-off limit for “young”, freemason Macron (45) is still in the search results. Fremason Trudeau, 51, isn’t, but is listed in weforum.org15, while Tulsi has been erased from there, in Apr 2022 (she independized from the Democratic party in Oct 2022).16 Maybe this was the drop that filled the cup: she’s against CBDCs and social scoring.17

https://www.younggloballeaders.org/community

The CFR is just a small piece of a large puzzle of thousands of organizations, for example:

9-11: 2 planes, all 7 WTC towers down, but not the closest non-WTC !

What’s the chance of this?: 11 Sep 1991, exactly a decade before 9-11 (2001), George Bush (father) said “What is at stake, is more than one small country - it is a big idea - a New World Order where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause... to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind - peace and security, freedom and the rule of law.. out of these humble times, our fifth objective - the New World Order - can emerge, [and] now we can see a new world coming into view. A world in which there is a very real prospect of a New World Order…” 18

September, 2000, one year before 9/11, Neo-Con think tank, “Project for the New American Century” (PNAC) 19 sustained: “the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.” PNAC members included Bush Administration insiders such as Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Libby and Perle.” 20

More here:

The 2020 and 2022 rigged and stolen elections (it’s the machines!):

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-2020-american-coup

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/david-rockefeller-illuminati

J6: what THEY don't want YOU to know

The fake riot was mason-planned, incited and guided by FBI agents, who broke into the Capitol !!!

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/j6-what-you-need-to-know

Are we crazy to accept demo-crazy?

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/democracy-democrazy

It sucks! We need to improve democracy… how about REAL democracy?

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/reinventing-democracy

The full PLAN exposed:

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-plan-revealed

Gates-WHO depop vaccines:

Proof: it was never for health and reduced mortality, only for infertilizing, handicapping and murdering!

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/depop-vaccines-no-myth

The threat of the WHO sovereignty-grab by the IHR and International PLANdemc Treaty:

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-threat-of-the-international-plandemic

Expand full comment

This might sound ridiculous to some, but as a past Democrat who switched to Independent after Obummer was nominated, I could NEVER vote for a Dem after the way they have behaved. The Dems of today are not the Dems of his families time. However, I do believe RFK, Jr would be a formidable candidate. I would hate to see him assinated, as his father and uncle were.

Expand full comment

I wonder if RFK, Jr. also doesn't believe in the Democrat Party anymore, but feels his best chance of winning a general election is not being a third party candidate? He MUST know that third party candidates never win the Presidency, no matter how good they are (a la Ron Paul).

Expand full comment

He realizes running as an independent would make DJT and himself probably lose. Adore him but couldn’t vote Dem ever again.

Expand full comment

AP hatchet job on RFK, Jr. is a new low for mainstream journalism.

I feel much better after writing this one, which I hope will be read by a large number of people.

https://billricejr.substack.com/p/hatchet-job-on-rfk-jr-is-new-low

Expand full comment

I have to say I think the hit piece Sid Hirsch ran last week on his father and uncle was far worse! It further solidifies what a threat he is to the status quo! Lets not forget Sid is in bed with the Clintons.

Expand full comment

That will be my plan. I’ll vote RFK jr in the primary and see if he can win my vote for Trump in the general election.

Expand full comment

Have not read all the comments below. However, any Republican who chooses to vote Democrat in the primary needs first to consider any state laws that are relevant to voting not Republican in the primary. In some states candidates must have voted in one or more Republican primaries in order to demonstrate that they are “in good standing Republicans.” Otherwise, aside from getting a “permission slip” from the local county GOP Chair, they may not run for public office as a Republican.

So, be aware.

Expand full comment

The notion that running in the Dem Party will give him the best exposure or influence feels to me to be a notion that is used to keep from rocking the duopoly off its throne…there has been so much of a divide by hate from the powers of both those parties & Bernie proved that it is easiest for the Dems to destroy the integrity of anyone who runs for The People, if they fall for the notion that they have to run as a Democrat…The people need a strong Independent candidate. Independent candidacy will bring people from across the political spectrum…otherwise, many in the Republican party, who don’t want to vote for Trump again, but cannot bring themselves to vote for a Democrat, will continue, like all the Dem voters, to keep the corruption of the duopoly controlling our elections, thus, our lives…it won’t end as long as we continue feeding that freaking beast.

Expand full comment

Very good stuff. While the vxxx and everything surrounding it is a huge issue, it is not THE issue. Freedom is and to get back to that we need smaller gov't, less taxes, less gov't spending, fewer regulations, right-to-work, and we need to fix voting, among other things. Will he do any of that? I doubt it, but a vote for him to shake up the Democrats and then vote for Trump or a real conservative like DeSantis is a good strategy.

Expand full comment

The whole PANDEMIC is THE issue, it caused bigger government, more taxes,more govt. Spending, more regulation, no body working, closing down businesses, vote by mail. ALL caused by The pandemic. And they are planning another one!!

Expand full comment

This - to my mind - is NOT about Bobby making it to the presidency. I mean, yeah, if by some grace he could win, that'd be awesome. But Instead, look at it as a badass way for Bobby Kennedy (and likely many of his tribe) to be blasting the airwaves. He is one of the best options we have of penetrating the dense fog that constrains so many. The world will be watching. His bid will be a great call to the militia!

We've got to wake up and fight back. Getting Bobby a much larger audience will have a powerful cascading positive effect. Guaranteed it will spawn numerous books, media articles, interviews, podcasts, etc. Even the mainstream media will have to cover him a tiny amount. Think of it as pushback to the propaganda. It's using their own corrupt broken political system to get some honest and wise counsel out to the world.

The MAIN reason we've done this (Covid) to ourselves is because we have been asleep @ the wheel. We need dudes like Bobby to break through to all those hypnotized brothers and sisters we live among. Who else has the gravitas (he's been bringing the good fight to some sun's a bitches for like 40 years)? He's also got an impressive depth of knowledge to understand deeply how government works. His life has been about coming to this moment.

I'm not saying he's the messiah or anything. But think about it for a minute. Who would have more impact than the Kennedy's lineage returning when the world is on the cliff. Honestly, it's hard to imagine we don't do ourselves in no matter who takes the reins

We need him to get a platform. I'm a 61 year old witness of a world rushing headlong to jump off the cliff. We're moving inexorably towards any of a number of existential threats.

Having said all the above, I still wouldn't wish the presidency on anyone. One of my greatest disappointments has been finding out about the long con that is politics. It took me until Bernie to realize just how rigged it all is. I hate to admit it, but it's lead to a setting in of apathy with this crazy world. So I hold no illusion they'd let him in.

But he's a warrior - and has been for many years. He's general material without question. The prospect of integrity in a presidential candidate, can you imagine? Even just having someone on stage that embodies that word - that would be something.

Bobby Kennedy makes me feel hope for the first time. He has ethics, tenacity, integrity and the smarts about government. Just getting him on stage and all the internet media appearances would get some sanity out into the world - s/t we desperately need to counter the never ending stream of BS.

Peace

Expand full comment

Wake up! the right has also BEEN shifted to the left (for example, think about "gay pride" and same-sex marriage, compulsory taught with Comprehensive Sexuality Education brainwashing generations ... look at StopCSE.com ).

What you and RFK don't get is that the system is rigged: it was created by masons (French and American Revolutions) for the masons: think about it... if masons infiltrate and control both parties, there's no democracy, just a uniparty as Tucker Carlson likes to remind us.

Guess who started the Ukraine war in 2014: mason Obama. Not a Neocon project but a mason Pearl Harbor event: rigged for the fall of Putin, who was against the mason New World Order. Check who funded the 30 biowar labs in Ukraine: the NIH? no, the masons there... under mason Fauci!

Think about Trump: probably half of his cabinet were masons. Not to mention the masons controlling the administration (Fauci, Collins, etc.). He was surrounded! Not much he could do!

The mason press, mainstream media is set to destroy any original idea.

One example: the Government spends 3000 million on abortion per year (most, funding Planned Parenthood). Trump only slashed 60 million: he didn't have what it takes to confront the administration, risking impeachment and jail to save the lives of all those babies.

RFK is great... but he still believes de decarb hoax and I'm not sure if he's prolife, the ultimate touchstone for integrity.

It’s the masons, dummy!

In 1921, the Council on Foreign Relations was founded, to infiltrate and control democracy, by freemasons David Rockefeller, Paul Warburg, Herbert Hoover, Allen Dulles, Walter Lippmann and Edward M. House. The impressive 10-thousand members list proves the power grab was successful.1 Since 1921, the CFR has chosen every single Secretary of State. Similar mason institutions, most with similar names, were founded in over 100 countries, including Britain's Royal Institute of International Affairs and the European Council on Foreign Relations2: practically, there’s no war where the CFR isn’t involved on both sides. 3 Their magazine Foreign Affairs is one way they send orders to all members.

In 2018, Wikileaks proved the CFR controlled all mainstream media.4

Hoover, Truman, Eisenhower, Bush father and son, Carter, Clinton, Obama 5 ... some argue that, with few exceptions like JFK and Trump, at least since WWII, all US presidents were freemasons and many CFR. All administrations were filled with thousands of CFR members. 6 The Trump administration was no exception. 7 It’s not a coincidence that Neil M. Gorsuch, CFR Supreme Court Justice appointed by Trump, betrayed conservatives by ruling in favour of homosexual marriage and other New World Order “progressive” agenda.

Another proof of grooming for infiltration: 28 Jun 2019 Democrat Tulsi Gabbard wasn’t renewed 5 CFR year membership. 8 Because she wouldn’t obey all orders? In 2020, she was still pro-homo-marriage9 and pro-abortion (a basic CFR request) and pro-Biden, but wanted paper ballots, Electoral College, supported Trump in breaking up Big Tech and removing their censorship through section 23010, Glass-Steagall, pro-natalism paid family and medical leave plans up to 12 weeks, less public and defense spending, drug patent breaking, no war.11 That’s probably why she was defamed by Kamala12, Hillary Clinton and mason Mitt Romney.13 In 2021, she questioned Fauci on COVID origin and masks.14 Tulsi was groomed by WEF in the "Forum of Young Global Leaders" but suddenly was disappeared, and not because she turned 38 (41 in 2023), the WEF cut-off limit for “young”, freemason Macron (45) is still in the search results. Fremason Trudeau, 51, isn’t, but is listed in weforum.org15, while Tulsi has been erased from there, in Apr 2022 (she independized from the Democratic party in Oct 2022).16 Maybe this was the drop that filled the cup: she’s against CBDCs and social scoring.17

https://www.younggloballeaders.org/community

The CFR is just a small piece of a large puzzle of thousands of organizations, for example:

9-11: 2 planes, all 7 WTC towers down, but not the closest non-WTC !

What’s the chance of this?: 11 Sep 1991, exactly a decade before 9-11 (2001), George Bush (father) said “What is at stake, is more than one small country - it is a big idea - a New World Order where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause... to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind - peace and security, freedom and the rule of law.. out of these humble times, our fifth objective - the New World Order - can emerge, [and] now we can see a new world coming into view. A world in which there is a very real prospect of a New World Order…” 18

September, 2000, one year before 9/11, Neo-Con think tank, “Project for the New American Century” (PNAC) 19 sustained: “the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.” PNAC members included Bush Administration insiders such as Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Libby and Perle.” 20

More here:

The 2020 and 2022 rigged and stolen elections (it’s the machines!):

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-2020-american-coup

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/david-rockefeller-illuminati

J6: what THEY don't want YOU to know

The fake riot was mason-planned, incited and guided by FBI agents, who broke into the Capitol !!!

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/j6-what-you-need-to-know

Are we crazy to accept demo-crazy?

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/democracy-democrazy

It sucks! We need to improve democracy… how about REAL democracy?

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/reinventing-democracy

The full PLAN exposed:

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-plan-revealed

Gates-WHO depop vaccines:

Proof: it was never for health and reduced mortality, only for infertilizing, handicapping and murdering!

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/depop-vaccines-no-myth

The threat of the WHO sovereignty-grab by the IHR and International PLANdemc Treaty:

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-threat-of-the-international-plandemic

Expand full comment

Bobby will blast the airwaves only as much as he is allowed by those who control the airwaves.

All Presidents are puppets to the banker.......

RFK Jr will do exactly as the 1% of the 1% want him to do.

Expand full comment
Apr 7, 2023·edited Apr 7, 2023

ABSOLUTELY TRUE. However, we're in a somewhat different era. Yes, all the legacy outlets, MSNBC, CBS, CNN, etc will certainly only put Bobby on the ad-hominem hyper snark gravy train - no question. Same thing they did to Bernie, to Jill Stein, Maryanne Williamson. Same old same old.

However, there is a large outgrowth of outside the box media that is growing - and in many cases have a MUCH larger viewership than the mainstream. I'm talking Jimmy Dore, Russell Brand. Dr. Drew and obviously the king Joe Rogan. Many of these channels have much bigger followings than the mainstream piss ants.

My point is, in an era where propaganda is now essentially state sponsored and unrelenting, we need EVERY other parallel media sources to pick up real candidates. If we have any chance in coming out of this inexorable nose dive, it's in getting the word out of real people with integrity. Otherwise, the only other alternative is this blind take over of the world's population.

This entire COVID catastrophe is also a great opportunity. They may have over played their hand and are now looking more and more like what they really are; controlling, crass, clueless, greedy, narcissistic blow hards that simply can't stop themselves. Unless we push-back with real folks - using media that WILL feature them - we're essentially laying down and yielding to their ongoing obscenity.

As for your comment that Bobby, if by some miracle he were elected, he'd just do what the 1% say, I beg to differ. Of anyone running today, he has rarely veered from what he knew to be true. Contrast that with most everyone else in the field - Bobby is NOT an opportunist. He would be different and has the knowledge of the constitution, the rule of law and how to clean up corruption that is conspicuous.

Peace

Expand full comment

ONe thing i like about RFK is his grounded politics. Neither right nor left but forward as a green party slogan once read. What he speaks he knows. And that is his superpower. He's not a poser!!!

Expand full comment

Hi Tarun,

Yup, I agree 100% - integrity is a discipline for Bobby. An inspiration given it's ubiquitous rarity in the political/public space.

Peace

Expand full comment

"ad-hominem hyper snark gravy train" Tulsi was on that train too.

Expand full comment

I would not call Jimmy Dore, Russell Brand. Dr. Drew or Joe Rogan outside the box media.

More like "Fence Post' that help keep up the narrative/fence in place that keeps the people from seeing that there just may be a better way to live than this system of enFORCEment we are born into.....

Expand full comment

Cool, we're all entitled to our opinions. However, that makes me curious. Who, to your mind are "outside the box media?"

Peace

Expand full comment

Well you ignored the fact that your/my life is about living in a system of 'collectivism' and 'enFORCEment'......... this is what is the issue is, not who is 'outside the box media'

It is the mainstream and outside the box media that set the paremeters for the narrative you are immersed in, call it my opinion but it is what i have concluded and there is plenty of information on this subject that would allow one to come to such conclusions.

Clearly the Mainstream and Outside the Box media have provided no solution to the present situations....eh? But keep watching....right?!?!

There are some people out on the web that have never given me a reason to pause, however there is no blind trust.

At times i will listen/read the work Whitney Webb or James Corbett but that is about it as far as any type of media. I spend my time reading books, this is how you learn but if your opinion is you can learn more from Jimmy Dore, Russel Brand, Dr, Drew, Joe Rogan...etc...etc... than reading a book go for it!

BTW seeing Russel Brand hanging with Yuval Harari should be enough for any intelligent thinkng flesh and blood man or women to know Russel Brand is not legit at all as any kind of 'media'

Expand full comment

Something that should be given but nothing could be harder to find in a politician today: "RJK Jr. personally have told me he is a man of integrity who will do the right thing under challenging circumstances. This is very difficult to find in an elected official."

Expand full comment

They own the delegates, democrat and republican. They choose who makes it, except in the case of Trump and that's why they used ALL media and academia, that they also own, to attack Trump. It would have been Trump vs Sanders if they didn't shoe in their girl Hillary to continue the national decline Obama set us on for 8 years.

Expand full comment

Is he still a global warming nutjob?

Expand full comment

He is mostly in favor of good stewardship of the earth, just as every right-thinking person should be. Since we all know that the health of the earth depends on how we take care of it, and has nothing to do with the Green corporate agenda, I am pretty sure he would come down on the right side of this issue as well if he had the right advisers. I know he supports many of the earth-health measures that conservatives also support, like getting rid of GMOs and making sure the soil is healthy.

Expand full comment

I too am concerned about the environment. But I have yet to see/read an environmentalist who takes a common sense approach to global warming and our environmental health. Seems like they all want to bankrupt us just so that we can go all in on green energy. They don't care if our monthly power bill is $2000

Expand full comment

The biosphere has greatly expanded because plants thrive on CO2. CO2 is NOT poison. It's a vital nutrient for all creatures.

Expand full comment

They never talk about hemp so if they don't talk about hemp you know they are just bluffing. Anyone who is serious about restoring the environment needs to be talking about hemp because hemp can do almost everything, it is an infinite resource, ordinary people could be paid to grow it, and we could start a whole new economy based on hemp. So now you know why they don't mention it.

Expand full comment

Other countries use hemp. The fabric is outstandingly strong. Not using hemp as a resource is just foolish.

Expand full comment

They are there, and their number is growing. Everyone in the regenerative farming movement is such a person. They know that regenerating the soil by using grazing animals stores more carbon than anything a corporation could dream up, that restoring prairie and savannah is better for the earth than planting millions of trees and then leaving them to die without water, or dimming the sun, or electric cars or smart cities and all the other horseshit the globalists want.

Expand full comment

And yet they have approved the geoengineering (and it IS currently happening - they 'll spray one day and within a few hours clouds develop and there is no sunshine the next few days but no rain), 4 and 5G (electrical sensitivity proving toxic to many people, animals and insects) and electric vehicles that use more energy to make than a fossil fuel vehicle. We need to go backwards to some extent - certainly regarding geoengineering, wifi and towers.

Expand full comment

It's always about money and power. It's about indebting poor countries and taking their natural resources. And keeping them from politically and economically aligning with oil-rich countries. It's a money and power grab by Western elites. And an attempt to extend the empire. If the people espousing the climate hysteria believed what they say, they'd sell their mansions and waterfront properties (plural, in every case), and stop traveling. Their actions speak louder than their words.

Expand full comment

or taking away our gas stoves, which actually is a clean burning fuel source.

Expand full comment

We don't need a daddy to do that for us. We should start making systems that we reward each other for keeping a low footprint. Instead everyone is waiting for their big daddy to make law before they do anything. If we want to be grown ups, we have to look to our peers to people our level. Otherwise we're going to stay as children.

Expand full comment

If Dr. Nass is a consultant with RFK, she should be able to persuade him against AGW BS.

Expand full comment

Why do you say that?

Expand full comment
Apr 6, 2023·edited Apr 6, 2023

He may be off base with some of these issues, but he asks questions and brings in different voices. He unabashedly loves this planet. This was a fantastic podcast regarding geoengineering and chemtrails...name one other voice of influence willing to talk about this issue?

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/are-chemtrails-real-with-dane-wigington/id1552000243?i=1000602210082

Expand full comment

No matter his other issues, anyone who wants to subject us to climate pseudoscience is way off base.

Climate pseudoscience is the very foundation of The Great Reset.

Expand full comment

It's the foundation because it has worked out well for them so far but the public are waking up to it

Expand full comment

Except the Democrats. From my experience, if you're a Democrat then you believe in CO2 catastrophe.

The Democrats are being used.

Expand full comment

In my lifetime alone, the hysteria has been: another ice age coming, then acid rain killing everything, then a hole in the ozone layer burning us alive, then global warming, and now, just "change" so that they can hype any weather event imaginable. Never once has one of their predictions come true. Ironically, they can't even accurately predict tomorrow's weather, much less the weather 50 years from now. The same inaccurate politically-motivated modeling that gave us the covid craziness is driving climate hysteria.

(And, for anyone reading this far, CO2 is not bad for the environment. It is good for the environment and the planet. It is plant food, after all. We have a relatively low level of CO2 in the atmosphere per geological historical levels, with most of it trapped inside the earth. And CO2 is physically capable of trapping only so much heat. Not enough to cause cataclysm. IOW, it's all a lie.)

Expand full comment

Yes

Expand full comment

Yep!!!!

Wrong Again: 50 Years of Failed Eco-pocalyptic Predictions

Myron Ebell, Steven J. Milloy • September 18, 2019

https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-years-failed-eco-pocalyptic-predictions

Expand full comment